UGLIEST Aircraft Built and Flown

Already mentionned the DB-10 as the ultimate horror, page 2 of this thread. https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/ugliest-aircraft-built-and-flown.22403/page-2

At least the AB-20 vaguely looks like a contemporary bomber, like the TB-3 or some british bombers. It has a "normal" shape. Except for the windows in the wing "profile".

Look ma ! A flying bathtub !

148756099_2686991781518639_1883495840756987711_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Already mentionned the DB-10 as the ultimate horror, page 2 of this thread. https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/ugliest-aircraft-built-and-flown.22403/page-2

At least the AB-20 vaguely looks like a contemporary bomber, like the TB-3 or some british bombers. It has a "normal" shape. Except for the windows in the wing "profile".

Look ma ! A flying bathtub !

148756099_2686991781518639_1883495840756987711_n.jpg
Only marginally worse than the Martin 123 prototype... (I love both, incidentally!)
 

Attachments

  • Popular Aviation 1932-10.jpg
    Popular Aviation 1932-10.jpg
    55.5 KB · Views: 27
What ? I love the Buccaneer "muscular" look.
The Buccaneer most certainly was a yorkie of an aircraft - a complete antithesis of the graceful and frail elegance of Spitfire or de Havilland Hornet. However, like you, I cannot call it ugly. It has a workmanlike charm to it.
 
"Aesthetically challenged" doesn't even begin to describe the Pemberton-Billing P.B.31E "Night Hawk" and its predecessor, the P.B.29 "Zeppelin Destroyer"...
Imagine this: the company became Supermarine soon after that!

1716412935639.png
1716413072761.png
 
Last edited:
  • 01-Goupil’s monoplane of 1884 02-the Lloyd 40.08 Luftkreuzer 03-Rocheville Arctic Tern
 

Attachments

  • 03-Rocheville Arctic Tern.jpg
    03-Rocheville Arctic Tern.jpg
    48.1 KB · Views: 28
  • 02-the Lloyd 40.08 Luftkreuzer.jpg
    02-the Lloyd 40.08 Luftkreuzer.jpg
    200.2 KB · Views: 29
  • 01-Goupil’s monoplane of 1884.jpg
    01-Goupil’s monoplane of 1884.jpg
    200.8 KB · Views: 28
If this aircraft has been completely invisible,
What aircraft? I don't see anything...

The aircraft in post #100 is why you don't use a disjunction drive while in the Bermuda Triangle.

The guy in the Norwegian camp in 82's The Thing that Mac brought back actually wasn't the creature...just the unfortunate waist gunner that popped in.
 
Last edited:
This plane is ugly but shot down a Thai fighter in January 1941.
Coming in the Asian war theatres on January, 1941, the New Action Movie:
"The Bad, the Good, and the "Loire-130"
;)
Tagline: "You ugly, but have the machine guns. Thai' fighters - not"
 
Last edited:
Actually, I thought the Navy and early Air Force variants of the Phantom were reasonably decent-looking. The F-4E with the gun fairing and the plethora of external hinges on the slats that don't even really retract flush and the fixed slat on the stabilators though... such a collection of afterthoughts and band aids!

Anyway, no such thread would be complete without these three:



 
I think we can dug even uglier french interbellum "aircraft".
 
More jewels Post-3
 

Attachments

  • 615.jpg
    615.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 27
  • 623.jpg
    623.jpg
    652.2 KB · Views: 22
  • AIF02051v.02.jpg
    AIF02051v.02.jpg
    460.2 KB · Views: 18
  • cd.jpg
    cd.jpg
    125.8 KB · Views: 18
  • DFW Floh.jpg
    DFW Floh.jpg
    177 KB · Views: 20
  • blackburn-f3-interwar-prototype-biplane-fighter-k2892-v0-96dwia5byzxa1.jpg
    blackburn-f3-interwar-prototype-biplane-fighter-k2892-v0-96dwia5byzxa1.jpg
    74.9 KB · Views: 23
  • img190.jpg
    img190.jpg
    502.8 KB · Views: 22
  • img179.jpg
    img179.jpg
    438.9 KB · Views: 20
  • img194.jpg
    img194.jpg
    435.2 KB · Views: 18
  • Lloyd 40-05.jpg
    Lloyd 40-05.jpg
    214.5 KB · Views: 18
Post-4
 

Attachments

  • img195.jpg
    img195.jpg
    421.5 KB · Views: 17
  • img196.jpg
    img196.jpg
    426.3 KB · Views: 16
  • img209.jpg
    img209.jpg
    436.4 KB · Views: 15
  • img410.jpg
    img410.jpg
    705.1 KB · Views: 15
  • img429.jpg
    img429.jpg
    901.6 KB · Views: 15
  • img431.jpg
    img431.jpg
    775.6 KB · Views: 14
  • img453.jpg
    img453.jpg
    549.8 KB · Views: 14
  • img467.jpg
    img467.jpg
    1.1 MB · Views: 16
  • img478.jpg
    img478.jpg
    454.7 KB · Views: 17
  • img479.jpg
    img479.jpg
    426.5 KB · Views: 19
Post-5
 

Attachments

  • img518.jpg
    img518.jpg
    395 KB · Views: 17
  • img640.jpg
    img640.jpg
    259.7 KB · Views: 18
  • img641.jpg
    img641.jpg
    635.6 KB · Views: 17
  • img642.jpg
    img642.jpg
    595.1 KB · Views: 17
  • img732.jpg
    img732.jpg
    953.1 KB · Views: 16
  • muy.jpg
    muy.jpg
    237.7 KB · Views: 17
  • ñ 002.jpg
    ñ 002.jpg
    189.3 KB · Views: 16
  • ñ 003.jpg
    ñ 003.jpg
    183.2 KB · Views: 17
  • ñ 004.jpg
    ñ 004.jpg
    301.3 KB · Views: 16
  • ñ.jpg
    ñ.jpg
    339.1 KB · Views: 18
@Michel Van,

Thanks for that video.

Potez 75 - it was a CAS plane for Algeria

Delannes - smart, but ugly

Agree about the Amiot 143 - I would say tragically ugly, as those planes tried to stop the panzers on May 13, 1940 near Sedan: against ferocious flak, 109s and 110s.

Breguet Alizé - less ugly than any Gannet

SE.100: not exactly ugly, but a bastard that killed its crew in 1940

Leduc 022: that one, again ? it was glorious and spectacular looking

Loire 130 : already mentionned. Admittedly, it looks like a shoe box with a flying boat around it (ROTFL)

SNCASE Grognard: ok, that one is supremely ugly, an obese crossed with a huntchback (fat fuselage plus dorsal air intake = ugly combo)

Bleriot 125 : sweet geez, that one is truly horrible. My eyes are bleeding ! I told you @Stargazer we could find more abominations if we dug the interbellum. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blériot_125 Seems it flew like a led brick, how surprising.
I knew about the Bleriot 127 (another horror not unlike my beloved Dyle & Bacalan) but the 125 looks like Porco Rosso's Mama Aiutos having a very bad day. Louis Bleriot died in 1936, 27 years after his channel crossing his star had paled... like too many french aircraft companies of the interbellum, he mostly produced monstrosities.

Finally, glad to see the Farman Jabiru winning the "ugly prize". The three engine variant is hard to beat as far as ugliness is concerned.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
I am always so fascinated by the monstrosities of the 20's and 30's that I cannot even find them ugly.
It is simultaneously the era I find most fascinating, and the era I have delved into the least. An age of "Let's just try this", and I love even the ugliest and least successful of them.

Airtruck, Norman Defender with the bulbous nose, and Nimrod AEW would probably get my top-three votes. Nimrod is doubly unfortunate because of it's lineage from the quite attractive Comet.
 
You guys think you've seen "ugly"?
Take a good look at the "Istina"... and scream (with laughter)! A monstrosity from 1987 built by Vladimir Mikhailovich Toporov, of Votkinsk in the former Soviet Union, it looked as if Clément Ader had been asked to design the Piasecki "Rescuer"... Its name meant "truth", and it was defined as a "manned flywheel". The real "truth" about it is that it was a non-starter. Amused onlookers at SLA-87 (the Russian Oshkosh) commented that when it puttered and hopped its way across the field, "it almost looked as if it was going to fly"...

223974.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Scan78.jpg
    Scan78.jpg
    23.6 KB · Views: 18
  • Scan69.jpg
    Scan69.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 18
  • Scan55.jpg
    Scan55.jpg
    32.8 KB · Views: 19
  • 224023.jpg
    224023.jpg
    460.2 KB · Views: 18
  • 223909.jpg
    223909.jpg
    807 KB · Views: 18
  • 8803_sla_87_11.jpg
    8803_sla_87_11.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 21
lol... the il-102... wtf were they thinking. a rear gunner on a small attack plane in mid/late cold war era. wow. the k2 wins today on this thread. i still love that abomination tho ngl.

Edit: and internal bomb bays lol
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom