All right people - let's fix the ubiquitous world hunger/water crisis, rising fascism, global climate change, sixth mass extinction, and ocean acidification, stat - but if not, let's just continue business as usual.Outstanding thread, great information from all posters.
Regards,
I was referring to Rick Rezabek, LOL.He got older, wiser, and even more devastatingly attractive.
No - Leon is not at all reasonable. Dude is insane.Elon is like a hothouse tomato grown in isolation. He's surrounded by too many influences. He is a reasonable guy but can be drawn off course quickly unless he identifies and sticks with good, calm role models.
While I understand your points, if we're talking about fielding an air force that is comprised of the best stealth aircraft that money can buy, I would think that a duo of The F-22 & YF-23 would have been a far better choice than pairing The Raptor with The F-35.No.
The YF-23 was incapable of doing VSTOL or taking off/landing from/on a carrier, in other words it was entirely incapable of meeting the JSF program specifications, on top of that it was a huge, twin engined, bloody expensive aircraft and one that had lost the ATF competition to LM´s YF-22 at that.
If the JSF program got scraped because the chaps at the Pentagon prefered a land CTOL only, big, twin engined, extremely expensive, strike fighter instead... then the Raptor was already in service with the USAF.
I mean, if you wanted the best Stealth Fighter, Just do F-23. Nuf saidWhile I understand your points, if we're talking about fielding an air force that is comprised of the best stealth aircraft that money can buy, I would think that a duo of The F-22 & YF-23 would have been a far better choice than pairing The Raptor with The F-35.
Lockheed-Martin has the full control over all the software for F-35 (is one of reasons why the jet is that expensive: constant maintenance and upgrades of software, which is so complex that the US government considers it a 'weapons system' on its own). Moreover, the software on export F-35s (except Israel's, of course), is 'dumbed down' - and it’s maintained in centralised fashion.
Lockheed-Martin has so much control over the software, that it can literally turn off single, selected F-35s. Own (those operated by US services) and/or those of export customers.
Sure, export customers have the option to disconnect their F-35s from the centralised software system. However, then the jet is also dumbed down: operational, but with much reduced capabilities.
Bottom line: as long as the USA are still friendly - and other people and nations doing what the USA demand - Lockheed-Martin is continuing to provide software updates for F-35s.
That said, F-16s - and then especially such old examples like delivered to Ukraine - are not that advanced, nor connected to any similar kind of centrally-operated software systems, like F-35s are.
I'm not denying this. I'm just saying that a) a F-16 didn't need that and b) it can be use as a restraint against the customer, perhaps for political reasons.@Archibald How many of the export partners / customers do you think are technically able to provide their own software maintenance capability for an aerospace system of this scale and complexity? Then filter again for how many do you think are willing to pay for this?