Last edited:

 
Last edited:


 



 
Last edited:

 
Space Force hints at offense, but details remain scant.

NATIONAL HARBOR, Md.

Offensive weapons to hold adversaries’ space systems at risk are top priorities for both the U.S. Space Force and U.S. Space Command, leaders made clear at AFA’s Air, Space & Cyber Conference in September.

1733064734679.png
 
Last edited:


 
Last edited:


 
Last edited:



 
Last edited:

Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and JROC Chair Adm. Christopher Grady referenced space weapons in a recent interview with Defense Scoop, saying, “We know that hypersonics allow us to defeat adversary hypersonics; and then, we also know that hypersonics allow us to leverage hypersonic aircraft and spacecraft missions in those two domains.”

The words are interesting is there some hypersonic programs we don't know about ?
 
Seems like nuclear-power is the best option unless they want to be refuelling regularly.

It would probably be cheaper to replace the entire satellite routinely. Refueling on the other hand is a more realistic option that the USAF is trying to create a standard for.
 
They would still need to refuel the propellant.
I was thinking of nuclear-electric but that might not give the thrust required. How are the Chinese doing it? Regular refuelling?



 
Last edited:
I was thinking of nuclear-electric but that might not give the thrust required. How are the Chinese doing it? Regular refuelling?




The real space Force.
 
I am assuming the PRC simply orbits satellites with conventional chemical/ion thrusters, though I am not familiar with the spacecraft being referred to. Certainly the U.S. maintains a number of satellites that drift just above or below for inspection purposes. My impression based on the statements in the article is that the PRC satellites changed their altitude a lot more often than, which I would assume either requires heavier propellant loads or shorter satellite life.

ETA: also AFAIK all electric thrusters still use some kind of propellant, just in a much mass efficient way.
 

Saltzman emphasized the Space Force has come a long way since its inception, with nearly 15,000 military and civilian personnel now serving the organization. This represents a monumental administrative feat as the service has approximately tripled in size every year since its inception in 2019.
Saltzman also emphasized the Space Force is not just a support element; it's a military service with a unique and critical role conducting warfighting operations.
Saltzman explained. "If space is a warfighting domain, and we are a military service dedicated to it, then Guardians have an obligation to contest and control that region, making it safe, secure and stable."
1. USSF capabilities are critical to the Joint Force and the American way of life.

2. The USSF must defend its capabilities, or the Joint Force will be unable to project power.

3. The USSF must protect the Joint / Combined Force from space-enabled targeting.

4. Space is a warfighting domain.

5. The USSF is responsible for organizing, training, equipping, and operating space capabilities.

6. Guardians are uniquely trained for warfighting in, from, and to space.


 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom