Five Su-57's will be delivered to RuAF this year
![]()
Первый серийный истребитель Су-57 разместили на юге России
Первый серийный истребитель пятого поколения Су-57 передали в один из авиаполков Южного военного округа (ЮВО), сообщило правительство Хабаровского края. РИА Новости, 21.01.2021ria.ru
No. Сontract for the 76 units provides delivering both versions. Second stage from ~2023 when izd. 30 complete state tests.22 by 2024 and 76 by 2027. So I am assuming that this is all 1st stage production and that there has to be a separate contract for the 2nd stage version, with new avionics and weapons?
I guess English to Russian translation is a pain to follow on what I write but it seems that the Deputy Defense Minister Alexei Krivoruchko said before the mid 2020's 2nd stage engine purchase is to take place, that several dozen aircrafts(assuming he is talking about the 76 su-57 order) will have AL-41F1 engines and to me that is a 1st stage engine which basically he is implying that the 76 aircraft will be 1st stage engines and that a separate order with the izdelie 30s has to be made in the mid-2020s and I am assuming that is after project megapolis is finished with the 2nd stage engines, new avionics, etc, etc.Don't know what you mean by the "second stage", but I am - Su-57 with a second stage engine(izd.30). Modernized Su-57 with new avionics more correctly called Su-57M, not "second stage".
Judge for yourself:I am reading that source right?
They are reporting the delivery of the first unit (the one that was unofficially delivered to GLITs last December) this year, so does that mean that there will be four units besides that one in 2021, as we were already expecting? Or is it five units to be delivered yet?Five Su-57's will be delivered to RuAF this year
![]()
Первый серийный истребитель Су-57 разместили на юге России
Первый серийный истребитель пятого поколения Су-57 передали в один из авиаполков Южного военного округа (ЮВО), сообщило правительство Хабаровского края. РИА Новости, 21.01.2021ria.ru
5 in total, 1 already delivered(tail number 01)so does that mean that there will be four units besides that one in 2021, as we were already expecting? Or is it five units to be delivered yet?
Tie fightersAnother good video of the wailing produced by the Radar Blocker. Definitely adds a signature unique character to the aircraft.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zid1Nv-FfyQ&ab_channel=AltTimofey
Did they?. I haven't heard of thatGiven that they had serious problem with the wing flexural modes (redesign of the wing box from CFRP to metal), I very much doubt that this was part of any design priority.
I haven't seen it myself pictured at least.
Based on the Flanker and bay capacity I assume the outermost wing pylons carry AAM only and the ones below the inlets can carry big A2G ordnance.Does anyone know if the outermost wing pylons and the pylons under air inlet can carry Kh-31 or Kh-58?
Keep in mind the photo came from this Poland site:Found this on Twitter. Had not seen it here. If repost will ask it be removed.
The author of the picture said this: so I take that the location of these antenna and their roles are his speculationIs that one in the Levcon edge also L-band ? If so it's kinda make me think why having 2 pairs of L-band arrays facing essentially the same direction.
The array in wingtips tbh looks more suitable for a self protection Cross Eye jamming purpose as it provides the widest point in the airframe. For maximizing error on enemy radar, about 4 wingspans. approaching Incoming radar missiles would have about 56 m of additional miss distance, that would considerably reduce damage probability from explosion or the missile would simply miss.
The wingtip antennas are for the L402 Himalayas EW subsystem. This is part of the Sh-121 system along with the 5 arrays of the NO36 Byelka radar.The author of the picture said this: so I take that the location of these antenna and their roles are his speculationIs that one in the Levcon edge also L-band ? If so it's kinda make me think why having 2 pairs of L-band arrays facing essentially the same direction.
The array in wingtips tbh looks more suitable for a self protection Cross Eye jamming purpose as it provides the widest point in the airframe. For maximizing error on enemy radar, about 4 wingspans. approaching Incoming radar missiles would have about 56 m of additional miss distance, that would considerably reduce damage probability from explosion or the missile would simply miss.
View attachment 649953
I found several conflicting information about the tail aperture.The wingtip antennas are for the L402 Himalayas EW subsystem. This is part of the Sh-121 system along with the 5 arrays of the NO36 Byelka radar.The author of the picture said this: so I take that the location of these antenna and their roles are his speculationIs that one in the Levcon edge also L-band ? If so it's kinda make me think why having 2 pairs of L-band arrays facing essentially the same direction.
The array in wingtips tbh looks more suitable for a self protection Cross Eye jamming purpose as it provides the widest point in the airframe. For maximizing error on enemy radar, about 4 wingspans. approaching Incoming radar missiles would have about 56 m of additional miss distance, that would considerably reduce damage probability from explosion or the missile would simply miss.
View attachment 649953
There is also a Himalayas installation in the rear tailcone according to Piotr Butowski.