- Joined
- 27 December 2005
- Messages
- 17,027
- Reaction score
- 22,275
Maybe I should print out some of these sketches and take them to Farnborough and ask Sukhoi guys which one looks most like T-60S
;D
;D
Matej said:Preview of unfinished T-54 drawing. Please NO QUESTIONS (adressed to me).
overscan said:Matej; doesn't your wing overlap the bomb bay when fully back? That would be a bad feature
Matej said:BTW, variable level double path jet isnt also a genial idea.
Matej said:Its clearly shown in flaterics picture. The main idea was to combine advantages of turbofan and turbojet. During cruise, engine is activated in high bypass ratio turbofan mode to save fuel. When needed, it can be switched to turbojet mode, when bypassing air is pressed to second turbojet, so virtually you will have two turbojets with low bypass ratio and high thrust instead of one turbofan.
Good idea on the paper, but very complicated in real.
Matej said:5. In 1985, Samojlovich moved to OKB MiG and used T-60 scheme as basis of new MiG 70.1 heavy interceptor. There is attempt to use the same airframe for tactical bomber.
TinWing said:Matej said:5. In 1985, Samojlovich moved to OKB MiG and used T-60 scheme as basis of new MiG 70.1 heavy interceptor. There is attempt to use the same airframe for tactical bomber.
This single statement makes the entire connection between the "701" and the T-60S very clear.
Thank you.
Meteorit said:But - at least I can't see any clear connection in the outward appearance of the T-60S and Product 701. ???
This has been on paralay's site for some time already, and I found it somewhat questionable. Can someone of you enlighten me?
paralay said:Official figure of supersonic passenger self-summer on the basis of the project 701.
Meteorit said:So, canard or no canard?
SOC said:Also, someone out there has a drawing that is very, very similar to what the T-60S configuration looks like. That much has been revealed by a senior Russian AF official in the open press, although he declined to say who had produced the drawing!