Probably a mistake. Cities are made of citizen of equal rights (at least in the United States). This is not what best define a private enterprise.
The risks for aggravated social meddling on SpaceX core activities could then rise higher.

Curiously, this is reciprocal with the late tendency in the SIlicon Valley.
 
Last edited:
Probably a mistake. Cities are made of citizen of equal rights (at least in the United States). This is not what best define a private enterprise.
The risks for aggravated social meddling on SpaceX core activities could then rise higher.

How many residents do you think Starbase, TX will have?

I suspect the number will be one.
 
Probably a mistake. Cities are made of citizen of equal rights (at least in the United States). This is not what best define a private enterprise.
The risks for aggravated social meddling on SpaceX core activities could then rise higher.

Curiously, this is reciprocal with the late tendency in the SIlicon Valley.
There are downsides, obviously. An incorporated township, however, can make its own statutes and have its own services (police, fire, water). It can fund infrastructure projects directly, and also plan them directly without relying on the county or state to share its priorities. It can levy taxes and sell municipal bonds to pay for things it needs.
It's not all bad. I suppose if thousands of people moved in suddenly who were directly hostile to SpaceX, it would sour. I think moat people moving to within earshot of Starbase are going to be employees (SpaceX or city) or hyper-fans of Musk.
 
Seems the plan (according to Berger) is to ditch SLS and transfer Orion either to Vulcan or New Glenn. Why not Falcon Heavy ?
 
SpaceX on Monday night launched a secretive rapid response mission for the Space Force, flying a GPS III satellite aboard a Falcon 9 rocket.

“The mission successfully demonstrated a complex integration effort across multiple Space Force organizations to pull an existing GPS III satellite from storage, accelerate integration and launch vehicle readiness, and rapidly process for launch,” the Space Force said in a statement.
 
It sounds like they had to integrate the vehicles from scratch, including new hardware. I'd suspect that if they have to do it again, cycle time would be much faster, with little or no NRE/qual effort.
 
It sounds like they had to integrate the vehicles from scratch, including new hardware. I'd suspect that if they have to do it again, cycle time would be much faster, with little or no NRE/qual effort.
No, this was a GPS III to a GPS orbit. Still have to do the analyses for the specific plane and launch dates and time.

Pulling a spacecraft storage entails having a test area, the "un-crating and unbagging" followed by system tests, then configuring for shipment and bagging and placing in a shipping container. Then shipping to launch site and reconfiguring the spacecraft for testing. Then propellant loading followed by close outs, adapter mate and encapsulation.
 
You should not take drugs and participate in a space program.


Well that issue is very complicated and due to his nature, very political. It is something best not discussed here.

To be frank, I have left all my other boards for being political. This is my last one. Let us not politicize this thread, for my sake, and also for the mods, blessed be they.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom