True.
This proposal by VAST as seen on NSF
may be of interest:
Starship Expendable Upper Stage?
forum.nasaspaceflight.com
That could go in one of two ways—
1.) Inert tankage either left alone or perhaps made a wet workshop, or
2.) Refilled like standard Starship but made a giant Dragon XXL.
That might push a hypergolic lander towards towards Mars’ asteroid moons to build infrastructure there, saving a manned landing for last—preferably with a smaller hypergolic craft.
I know, this less than the all-or-nothing approach where Starship just does a Ray Bradbury all in one go…but this may be a way to engender longer term support for prolonged Mars exploration by havinga more easily scrubbed lander the planetary protection types could swallow.
Once infrastructure is in place, XXLs can take their time on trajectories described here:
Just as sat-nav did away with the need to argue over the best route home, scientists from the University of Surrey have developed a new method to find the optimal routes for future space missions without the need to waste fuel. The paper is published in the journal Astrodynamics.
phys.org
Los Angeles CA (SPX) Apr 26, 2024 - NASA's Engineering and Safety Center has introduced a new approach, dubbed Trajectory Reverse Engineering (TRE), for transferring spacecraft trajectories between flight mechanics tools. This m
www.spacedaily.com
—with Falcon Heavy Red Dragons for fast taxies perhaps.
FLEM revised?