SiAW (Stand-in Attack Weapon)

I’m all for activating as many munitions production lines as possible but USAF has their toy and I think the USN will hold out for HALO. I cannot imagine a foreign organization funding it if they could just buy AGM-88G.
 
Its a developed system but we need to get it into production.
It is not a developed system. video itself references ready to go into EMD. Not completed EMD and ready for production. SiAW is in development now, and its parent missile (AARGM-ER) is undergoing operational testing and could declare IOC in the next few months or next year.
 
I’m all for activating as many munitions production lines as possible but USAF has their toy and I think the USN will hold out for HALO. I cannot imagine a foreign organization funding it if they could just buy AGM-88G.
How is it different from an AGM-88G? Can Lockheed cater to a different need, integrate different guidance and warhead solutions and field something that is more optimized for a particular target set (that AARGM-ER and SiAW are not optimized against)? One can use ones imagination and come with a whole host of scenarios where this could work for US and foreign customers. HALO is highly ambitious and highly risky. Not sure if its doable within program timelines to be completely honest.
 
From LM

1721773801536
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240807_122255_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240807_122255_Chrome.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 24
Hi @flateric,

But how would you attach an online image?

Best,

TViP
prt sc (print screen button), open Paint, Ctrl+V, select part you want with icon at top left, Ctrl+C, go to forum, Ctrl+V.

The first time you do it, you may have to disable that crappy clipping tool that Microsoft added in the Options when that weird screen appears, or alternatively use Ctrl+Prt Sc instead of just Prt Sc.

Or just right-click copy image & paste if it allows.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    85.9 KB · Views: 11
  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 10
  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    169.2 KB · Views: 13
  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 16
Ok, so it really is not going to deviate from AARGM-ER by much. Presumably a different terminal seeker? I think USAF wanted a modular warhead option too.
 

Northrop describes the SiAW as addressing “capability gaps created by 2025+ threats.” Although branded a “stand-in” weapon, Northrop said the weapon can be delivered “from sanctuary,” meaning at distances outside the engagement zones of some anti-aircraft systems. Its actual range and speed have not been divulged, but the AARGM-ER is believed to be a Mach 4 missile with a range of 180 miles, and the SiAW may have better performance.
 
Defense Updates put out this video about the importance of the SiAW yesterday:


The U.S. Air Force has reached a significant milestone in developing its new Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW), successfully completing the missile's first test release from an F-16 Fighting Falcon. Although the test was conducted on November 7 over the Gulf of Mexico, the achievement was officially announced on December 2. This successful trial marks a key step toward advancing the evaluation of the tactical air-to-surface missile system, which aims to strengthen the U.S. military’s strike capabilities.
The test employed a Jettison Test Vehicle (JTV), a non-functional prototype without a rocket motor or electronics, to validate the safe separation of the SiAW missile from the aircraft. This critical step ensures the missile can be safely deployed in operational scenarios and sets the stage for future testing phases.
The mission was coordinated by the 96th Test Wing, with operations managed from the Eglin Central Control Facility. Engineers and pilots collaborated closely to ensure the test's success, while aerial footage was captured to aid in post-flight analysis. Major James Tipton, assistant director of operations for the 780th Test Squadron, commended the effort, describing it as “a testament to the outstanding teamwork from everyone involved.”
In this video, Defense Updates analyzes why Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW) is imperative for the U.S. military?
Chapters:
00:11 INTRODUCTION
02:37 BACKGROUND
04:28 SiAW
07:28 ANALYSIS

I assume that while the JTV had an inert rocket-motor, warhead and GCU-electronics it would've been instrumented with a telemetry unit onboard to transmit measurements data?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom