I’m all for activating as many munitions production lines as possible but USAF has their toy and I think the USN will hold out for HALO. I cannot imagine a foreign organization funding it if they could just buy AGM-88G.
It is not a developed system. video itself references ready to go into EMD. Not completed EMD and ready for production. SiAW is in development now, and its parent missile (AARGM-ER) is undergoing operational testing and could declare IOC in the next few months or next year.Its a developed system but we need to get it into production.
View: https://x.com/AirPowerNEW1/status/1816060746729484304Mako, A Hypersonic Missile That’s More Than Ready
Hypersonic missiles take time to develop. Especially those compact enough to stow in the internal bay of stealth aircraft for close-up launches—and innovative enough to maneuver in the hypersonic regime.www.lockheedmartin.com
Character limit maybe. A&C are the same size anyway. Although SiAW is a USAF program, so maybe they're pushing this for the USN.But why mentioning only the F-35C? (and not the A)
How is it different from an AGM-88G? Can Lockheed cater to a different need, integrate different guidance and warhead solutions and field something that is more optimized for a particular target set (that AARGM-ER and SiAW are not optimized against)? One can use ones imagination and come with a whole host of scenarios where this could work for US and foreign customers. HALO is highly ambitious and highly risky. Not sure if its doable within program timelines to be completely honest.I’m all for activating as many munitions production lines as possible but USAF has their toy and I think the USN will hold out for HALO. I cannot imagine a foreign organization funding it if they could just buy AGM-88G.
Character limit maybe. A&C are the same size anyway. Although SiAW is a USAF program, so maybe they're pushing this for the USN.
Not going to fit internally on a B though, as with many things.They seem to be pushing it for the UK as well...just posted this and the article in the Re-arming the UK thread...
View: https://twitter.com/LMUKNews/status/1816102364736008260
Not going to fit internally on a B though, as with many things.
From LM
But how would you attach an online image?
prt sc (print screen button), open Paint, Ctrl+V, select part you want with icon at top left, Ctrl+C, go to forum, Ctrl+V.
The MAKO missile represents an important change of direction ofr the US defence industry.
First Stand-In Attack Missile Delivered To USAF
The Air Force hopes to field the Stand-In Attack Weapon, designed to offer a new way to strike key time-sensitive targets, starting in 2026.www.twz.com
Perhaps they will be able to get the cost down from $1.3M (AARGM-ER) to $1.1M. With this insane cost saving we will finally be able to out-produce the PRC!So they're going for a common airframe/rocket-motor/warhead/tail-controls design? That should lower production costs quite a bit.
Northrop describes the SiAW as addressing “capability gaps created by 2025+ threats.” Although branded a “stand-in” weapon, Northrop said the weapon can be delivered “from sanctuary,” meaning at distances outside the engagement zones of some anti-aircraft systems. Its actual range and speed have not been divulged, but the AARGM-ER is believed to be a Mach 4 missile with a range of 180 miles, and the SiAW may have better performance.
The U.S. Air Force has reached a significant milestone in developing its new Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW), successfully completing the missile's first test release from an F-16 Fighting Falcon. Although the test was conducted on November 7 over the Gulf of Mexico, the achievement was officially announced on December 2. This successful trial marks a key step toward advancing the evaluation of the tactical air-to-surface missile system, which aims to strengthen the U.S. military’s strike capabilities.
The test employed a Jettison Test Vehicle (JTV), a non-functional prototype without a rocket motor or electronics, to validate the safe separation of the SiAW missile from the aircraft. This critical step ensures the missile can be safely deployed in operational scenarios and sets the stage for future testing phases.
The mission was coordinated by the 96th Test Wing, with operations managed from the Eglin Central Control Facility. Engineers and pilots collaborated closely to ensure the test's success, while aerial footage was captured to aid in post-flight analysis. Major James Tipton, assistant director of operations for the 780th Test Squadron, commended the effort, describing it as “a testament to the outstanding teamwork from everyone involved.”
In this video, Defense Updates analyzes why Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW) is imperative for the U.S. military?