SiAW (Stand-in Attack Weapon)

I’m all for activating as many munitions production lines as possible but USAF has their toy and I think the USN will hold out for HALO. I cannot imagine a foreign organization funding it if they could just buy AGM-88G.
 
Its a developed system but we need to get it into production.
It is not a developed system. video itself references ready to go into EMD. Not completed EMD and ready for production. SiAW is in development now, and its parent missile (AARGM-ER) is undergoing operational testing and could declare IOC in the next few months or next year.
 
I’m all for activating as many munitions production lines as possible but USAF has their toy and I think the USN will hold out for HALO. I cannot imagine a foreign organization funding it if they could just buy AGM-88G.
How is it different from an AGM-88G? Can Lockheed cater to a different need, integrate different guidance and warhead solutions and field something that is more optimized for a particular target set (that AARGM-ER and SiAW are not optimized against)? One can use ones imagination and come with a whole host of scenarios where this could work for US and foreign customers. HALO is highly ambitious and highly risky. Not sure if its doable within program timelines to be completely honest.
 
From LM

1721773801536
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20240807_122255_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20240807_122255_Chrome.jpg
    112.1 KB · Views: 17
Hi @flateric,

But how would you attach an online image?

Best,

TViP
prt sc (print screen button), open Paint, Ctrl+V, select part you want with icon at top left, Ctrl+C, go to forum, Ctrl+V.

The first time you do it, you may have to disable that crappy clipping tool that Microsoft added in the Options when that weird screen appears, or alternatively use Ctrl+Prt Sc instead of just Prt Sc.

Or just right-click copy image & paste if it allows.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    85.9 KB · Views: 6
  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 6
  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    169.2 KB · Views: 8
  • Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    Traveling at more than five times the speed of sound, our innovative hypersonic Mako™ is fast ...jpg
    69.1 KB · Views: 10
Ok, so it really is not going to deviate from AARGM-ER by much. Presumably a different terminal seeker? I think USAF wanted a modular warhead option too.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom