Re: Shenyang J-21 / J-31 revealed!
Is it though? Being able to produce flankers independently on a modern line with their own modifications and updates to make it a competitive to other modern fighters, and all the associated tests and know-how required to make it workable aircraft, is no small feat for an aerospace company. If anything, I think SAC producing its own flankers demonstrates just how good they've gotten at the aircraft development and production business... and is a logical and important stepping stone to producing their own designs.
I'm also doubtful as to the benefit of cyber espionage in assisting the development of FC-31 -- it seems like most of the discourse surrounding the suggesting revolves around FC-31's outward shape to F-22 and F-35... ignoring that almost every other small to medium sized fighter programme under development around the world features a similar configuration or has such a configuration as a major contender (ATD-X, KFX, TFX, AMCA)... And there's also the very real possibility that espionage against F-35 was not to assist their own stealth fighter development but rather to help develop counter measures against it instead, which is one scenario that most media do not seem to have considered.
sublight is back said:Blitzo said:... at present it is the only other stealth fighter proposal with a flying airframe on the export market outside of F-35...
I find it incredibly far beyond plausibility that they could go from producing Russian fighter copies to fifth generation fighters in one fantastic leap. Stolen plans to the Death Star or not, it is just unbelievable.
Is it though? Being able to produce flankers independently on a modern line with their own modifications and updates to make it a competitive to other modern fighters, and all the associated tests and know-how required to make it workable aircraft, is no small feat for an aerospace company. If anything, I think SAC producing its own flankers demonstrates just how good they've gotten at the aircraft development and production business... and is a logical and important stepping stone to producing their own designs.
I'm also doubtful as to the benefit of cyber espionage in assisting the development of FC-31 -- it seems like most of the discourse surrounding the suggesting revolves around FC-31's outward shape to F-22 and F-35... ignoring that almost every other small to medium sized fighter programme under development around the world features a similar configuration or has such a configuration as a major contender (ATD-X, KFX, TFX, AMCA)... And there's also the very real possibility that espionage against F-35 was not to assist their own stealth fighter development but rather to help develop counter measures against it instead, which is one scenario that most media do not seem to have considered.