- Joined
- 5 May 2007
- Messages
- 1,247
- Reaction score
- 2,292
I'd expect that RNZN crewing practice is along RN lines; I've been aboard RN ships with half that many crew that carried an XO.Yes, it should, assuming that this ship is big enough to have an XO. Crew is a minimum of 39, though it sounds like they were carrying ~64 RNZN crew, 4 crew from other militaries and 7 scientists for a total of 75. I'm not sure where the RNZN would insist on having an XO to handle things when you're talking 40-60 crew.
Her responsibility, but not necessarily her fault. I can imagine plenty of circumstances where perfectly reasonable operational decisions in a challenging environment lead to the loss of a ship.No, it is the CO's fault. Her ship, her fault.
Bear in mind that hydrographic survey ships are required to go into waters where the bottom topography is uncertain. That inherently brings a degree of risk. It can (and should) be mitigated by the design of the ship and the way it's operated. But sometimes you have a bad day at sea.