U.S. scientists have achieved net energy gain in a fusion reaction for the second time since December, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory said on Sunday.

Scientists at the California-based lab repeated the fusion ignition breakthrough in an experiment in the National Ignition Facility (NIF) on July 30 that produced a higher energy yield than in December, a Lawrence Livermore spokesperson said.
 
Technically a lie. They achieved a plasma Q over >1, but factoring in the efficiency of the laser net Q is way less than 1.
 
Only because they are using highly inefficient research lasers from the 80's. This is a research lab not an operational plant, and their focus isn't an operational power plant. They did their job showing it works, now its up to someone else to commercialize it.
 
Only because they are using highly inefficient research lasers from the 80's. This is a research lab not an operational plant, and their focus isn't an operational power plant. They did their job showing it works, now its up to someone else to commercialize it.
Maybe. They're getting about 1.55x out (3.15MJ) what they put in (2.05MJ), so it would need a laser that's at least 66% efficient, even after frequency multiplication to 351nm and Q-switching, which is a big ask. Currently, the record is held by diode lasers at 65% with fibre lasers down at ~50% and that doesn't include getting it to the correct wavelength for fusion, or making it into a pulse. So, we're not there yet. I think someone said that they need to get to 6-8MJ out for 2MJ in, then we'll be there.
 
Last edited:
Fusion news

Cosmic Rays
https://www.labmanager.com/a-new-lens-into-the-universe-s-most-energetic-particles-31115
 
In the news

Cold plasma X-rays and fusion

A reactor for the Moon:

Seems familiar....
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=phPp5oYnps0
 
Last edited:
Building a working fusion reactor is trivial. I'm talking high school science project trivial. You need a good vacuum pump (and bell glass) and the 25kv power supply from a neon sign. You can make the rest in any metal shop. Presto, one Farnsworth Fusor. Now that a friend of mine has a mill, I need to talk to him about making one for myself. Just need to mind the neutrons.

Building a working fusion reactor that produces more power than it takes to cause fusion is a challenge.

Tangential, I'm told there's still on-going research into 'Cold Fusion', usually by other names, and perhaps some-one will figure WTF was actually happening.
The best explanation I have read is on the "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" pages. Some weird interactions between hellacious voltages and amperages (250kv and 50,000 amps kinds of numbers), with cosmic ray interactions doing something to catalyze the process. This has been observed and fusion-energy neutrons detected in high altitude thunderstorms, for example, so we know that it does work to a low level.



Well, Rosatom actually made research on the hybrid fusion-fission reactor (which would use Tokamak-type device to produce fusion plasma, that would bombard the thorium fuel with neutrons - thus "burning out" the Th-232 and resulting U-233 by intence neutron radiation. Boosted-fission reactor, sort of. Currently it's still a theory, but, well, Rosatom is a world leader in advanced reactors. They are the guys who are most likely to figure it out.
If a Russian math/physics nerd tells me he's figured out something, I will put money that he is correct.



OMG. I despair. :rolleyes:
One problem, he said, was wrong sizes for the joints of blocks to be welded together for the installation’s 19 metres by 11 metres (62ft by 36ft) chamber.

The second was traces of corrosion in a thermal shield designed to protect the outside world from the enormous heat created during nuclear fusion.

Fixing the problems “is not a question of weeks, but months, even years”, Barabaschi said.
1) How the hell did those joint sizes get past blueprint review, let alone production?

2) Let me guess, construction was suspended pending funds for a while, so the thermal shield was left exposed to the elements?
 

weird interactions between hellacious voltages and amperages (250kv and 50,000 amps kinds of numbers), with cosmic ray interactions doing something to catalyze the process. This has been observed
Just today phys.org has the article:
"New plasma instability sheds light on the nature of cosmic rays."

With accelerators smaller...could you line a tokamak with them for modification of plasma?

Part of me thinks an energy generating reactor needs a little of everything... lasers hitting a palladium target inside a....

Now iron can indeed be fused...even if poorly...but for constant fusion.. maybe an iron cigar type wrapping---very thin mind you---filled with more easily fused materials can be a sacrificial fuel rod inserted into a reactor like coal in a furnace...Tsander autophagy style.
 
Last edited:
I was talking about hybrid fission-fusion thorium reactor research:


Tokamak and MSR hybrids, that's the way to go.

Molten Salt Reactor has a tritium waste issue - and need fast neutrons to turn (a) U238 into U235 b) U238 into Pu239 and c) Thorium 232 into Uranium 233. Can also be fed with dismantled A-bomb cores and nuclear waste.

And now, the good news: Tokamak could help. Not only would it provide the said fast neutrons BUT it would also thrive on that pesky tritium. It LOVES tritium for breakfast and dinner.

Bottom line: MSR helps salvaging the billions sunk into Tokamak since 60 years or more. Fusion fission alliance (should we could that fuission ?)


The Russians once had one damn good idea: they wanted to turn their T-15 tokamak into such hybrid.
 
New material for fusion

New way to charge batteries

Coding
 
Last edited:
The latest

Radiation and water
 
Helicity Space raises $5 million for fusion engine development



Report includes a status of work.
 
Lockheed Martin Ventures invests in Helicity Space

SAN FRANCISCO – Helicity Space, a California startup developing fusion engines for spaceflight, announced an investment April 2 from Lockheed Martin Ventures.
 
In the news

Other magnet uses


The Stanford…I mean Sanford…circular accelerator

Where’s Lamont?
 
Last edited:
A tokamak in France set a new record in fusion plasma by encasing its reaction in tungsten, a heat-resistant metal that allows physicists to sustain hot plasmas for longer, and at higher energies and densities than carbon tokamaks.

 
Some fusion and nuclear news from across the web

Now this is what interests me the most here:

Ramifications for the nuclear lightbulb?

Having forgotten about NIF, I didn't think optics would have much to do with fusion.

Light handling technologies no one would think of using might wind up being relevant---

More
 
Last edited:

Machine 4 will have a stored electrical energy of about 100 megajoules with the capability of launching projectiles at 60 kms per second. This speed on impact inside the target will accelerate to about 200kms per second as a result of First Light’s exclusive amplifier technology.
First Light is aiming for net energy gain with Machine 4 with fuel gain of 100 or more. This machine is the building block for the pilot power plant, validating First Light’s simulation codes, while de-risking the design of high-gain targets for power production.
They are aiming for a power plant producing ~150 MW of electricity, firing once every 30 seconds, and costing less than $1 billion.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VTj5HKiLKJY
 
Last edited:
Just today phys.org has the article:
"New plasma instability sheds light on the nature of cosmic rays."

With accelerators smaller...could you line a tokamak with them for modification of plasma?
Well above my paygrade, and the gentleman I used to ask about those types of questions has passed.

The other Navy Nuke I know isn't a Fusion guy (and he's kinda eyeballs deep in trying to run a submarine repair depot).
 
It looks like there are ways to better handle plasmas:

This looks fun
"The laboratory generation of plasma 'fireballs' composed of matter, antimatter, and photons is a research goal at the forefront of high-energy-density science," says lead author Charles Arrowsmith, a physicist from the University of Oxford who is joining LLE in the fall.

So THAT'S how the Romulans did it...
 
Preventing erosion
 
Last edited:
A look inside fusion and nuclear power
 
Highly fascinating publiusr. It is only a matter of time before we crack the mystery of nuclear fusion for clean and unlimited power without the problem of nuclear waste that we currently get from nuclear fission reactors that are curently in use today.
 
Lots of folks are working on it, certainly

Physics news

accelerator
 
Last edited:
Lots of folks are working on it, certainly
Some misleading information at the end. ITER generates 500MW of thermal power, using a total of 440MW of electrical power. It then has to convert that 500MWth to electrical power, which will likely come to ~240MWe, so it generates -200MWe, no homes could be powered.

This gives a slightly more optimistic net loss figure than Sabine, but nevertheless, a net loss.
 
Maybe the Z-pinch

Fusion visualized

new accelerator and physics
 
Last edited:
Fusion and physics for you

More
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom