- Joined
- 6 August 2007
- Messages
- 3,344
- Reaction score
- 3,463
Nope. The relationship between radar wavelength and size of physical features means a smaller B-2 could be more detectable to long wavelength radars for example.
Bahret put this well:
The result of all this experimentation was a gradually increasing understanding of flare spots-what they were for different vehicles, how they behaved at different radar frequencies, and how they should be modeled. The picture emerged that the influence of a flare spot was related to its’ geometry first of all, but also to its’ dimensions measured in the wavelengths with which it was illuminated.
What this means in simple terms is that at what are called “microwave frequencies”-those above 2000 megahertz (mhz) or so -a normal aircrafts’ echo derives from a set of individual sources, while at much lower frequencies, the increasing tendency is for the entire aircraft to act like one big source-with only the general shape being a factor. At extremely low frequencies, even the shape loses influence and only the volume matters.
A fighter sized aircraft is difficult to shape to reduce RCS at low frequencies. A large aircraft like the B-2 presents opportunities to using shaping to reduce RCS across a much wider range of frequencies. If you took a B-2 and shrank it though the shaping would become less effective as it got smaller - the RCS would change, and not likely for the better.