New Super Hornet UAP video from 2015


LIPFs can emit light of any wavelength: visible, infrared, ultraviolet or even terahertz waves. You can make an object that looks real to the eye. When this tech makes it to the commercial sector, you'll finally get that floating shark, Marty McFly.
Then how do you explain it showing up on ship's radar 60 miles away, projected way beyond horizon without any sign of aircraft in the vicinity? Or the fact that Christopher Mellon affirmed that it was not any classified program he was aware of. It seems to me you continue to pick and choose what to argue against and not realizing your hypothesis falls apart when faced with the totality of all inconsistencies and lack of evidence.

This is the problem with UAP discourse, people are so afraid of the notion of celestial origin (rightly so and should) that they are willing to die the hill of bad arguments.
 
Last edited:

LIPFs can emit light of any wavelength: visible, infrared, ultraviolet or even terahertz waves. You can make an object that looks real to the eye. When this tech makes it to the commercial sector, you'll finally get that floating shark, Marty McFly.
Then how do you explain it showing up on ship's radar 60 miles away, projected way beyond horizon without any sign of aircraft in the vicinity? It seems to me you continue to pick and choose what to argue against and not realizing your hypothesis falls apart when faced with the totality of all inconsistencies and lack of evidence.

This is the problem with UAP discourse, people are so afraid of the notion of celestial origin (rightly so and should) that they are willing to die the hill of bad arguments.

There are only two possible explanations.

1) Earth origin.

2) Outer space origin.

No one wants to deal with either, except those in classified positions. They have to.
 
Just so I am clear. The "object" had no hypersonic wake. Created no hypersonic boom. There was no hypersonic turbulence created that any of the pilots reported, and your assertion is that it is extra terrestrial in origin?
 
Just so I am clear. The "object" had no hypersonic wake. Created no hypersonic boom. There was no hypersonic turbulence created that any of the pilots reported, and your assertion is that it is extra terrestrial in origin?
it would take more leap of faith to believe in the idea that aliens arrive here using kinetic energy to push themselves thru physical space than the idea that aliens arrived here.

regardless I'm not dying on the hill that aliens visited us in these instances but you're seemingly willing to die on the hill of some patent being the be all end all answer to all these incidents regardless of contrary evidence.
 
Just so I am clear. The "object" had no hypersonic wake. Created no hypersonic boom. There was no hypersonic turbulence created that any of the pilots reported, and your assertion is that it is extra terrestrial in origin?
Does this plasma miracle work underwater? They've also mentioned sitings going into and out of water, and disturbing water.
 
1947 - Air Materiel Command at Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio. 'We should look into this.'

1950s - Various groups like the USAF, CIA and FBI are getting reports. 'We should look into this.'

1966 - The University of Colorado gets a contract from the USAF to look into this and they find nothing 'of scientific value.'

1968 - The Condon Report is released. It contains nothing of scientific value

1970s - Nothing.

1980s - More nothing.

2022 - We should look into this.

Or, more baloney.
 

NASA to Set Up Independent Study on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena​

NASA is commissioning a study team to start early in the fall to examine unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) – that is, observations of events in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena – from a scientific perspective. The study will focus on identifying available data, how best to collect future data, and how NASA can use that data to move the scientific understanding of UAPs forward.

The limited number of observations of UAPs currently makes it difficult to draw scientific conclusions about the nature of such events. Unidentified phenomena in the atmosphere are of interest for both national security and air safety. Establishing which events are natural provides a key first step to identifying or mitigating such phenomena, which aligns with one of NASA’s goals to ensure the safety of aircraft. There is no evidence UAPs are extra-terrestrial in origin.

“NASA believes that the tools of scientific discovery are powerful and apply here also,” said Thomas Zurbuchen, the associate administrator for science at NASA Headquarters in Washington. “We have access to a broad range of observations of Earth from space – and that is the lifeblood of scientific inquiry. We have the tools and team who can help us improve our understanding of the unknown. That’s the very definition of what science is. That’s what we do.”

The agency is not part of the Department of Defense’s Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force or its successor, the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group. NASA has, however, coordinated widely across the government regarding how to apply the tools of science to shed light on the nature and origin of unidentified aerial phenomena.

The agency’s independent study team will be led by astrophysicist David Spergel, who is president of the Simons Foundation in New York City, and previously the chair of the astrophysics department at Princeton University in Princeton, New Jersey. Daniel Evans, the assistant deputy associate administrator for research at NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, will serve as the NASA official responsible for orchestrating the study.

“Given the paucity of observations, our first task is simply to gather the most robust set of data that we can,” said Spergel. “We will be identifying what data – from civilians, government, non-profits, companies – exists, what else we should try to collect, and how to best analyze it.”

The study is expected to take about nine months to complete. It will secure the counsel of experts in the scientific, aeronautics, and data analytics communities to focus on how best to collect new data and improve observations of UAPs.

“Consistent with NASA’s principles of openness, transparency, and scientific integrity, this report will be shared publicly,” said Evans. “All of NASA’s data is available to the public – we take that obligation seriously – and we make it easily accessible for anyone to see or study.”

Although unrelated to this new study, NASA has an active astrobiology program that focuses on the origins, evolution, and distribution of life beyond Earth. From studying water on Mars to probing promising “oceans worlds,” such as Titan and Europa, NASA’s science missions are working together with a goal to find signs of life beyond Earth.

Furthermore, the agency’s search for life also includes using missions such as the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and Hubble Space Telescope, to search for habitable exoplanets, while the James Webb Space Telescope will try to spot biosignatures in atmospheres around other planets – spotting oxygen and carbon dioxide in other atmospheres, for example, could suggest that an exoplanet supports plants and animals like ours does. NASA also funds space-based research that focuses on technosignatures – that is signatures of advanced technology in outer space -- from other planets.

Learn more about NASA’s astrobiology program online at:

 
The thing is for arguments sake if some of these are aliens that would mean for them to be here their technology would have to be able to circumvent fundamental laws of the universe. If that’s case they would be so advanced then what are people meant to do about it, as it’s the equivalent of an ant in the garden striking up a conversation with you.
 
NASA? If they are limiting their study from 2015 to present, WHY? UFOs became UAPs and they decided the two are totally different? Based on what? But that appears to be the decision they made: "The limited number of observations of UAPs..." “Given the paucity of observations, ..." Seriously? The U.S. military had no advanced cameras and image processing capabilities before 2015? UFOs/UAPs before 2015 no longer count? I find that... uh... what's the word... incredibly stupid. I think some among the general public will notice.

"There is no evidence UAPs are extra-terrestrial in origin." Good to hear. Then they are manmade...

Aside from that, expect more announcements about more announcements.
 

Navy Releases Videos From Mysterious Drone Swarms Around Warships Off California​

by Adam Kehoe and Marc Cecotti
[...]The first of these videos was captured by the USS Paul Hamilton and shows footage of the Bass Strait, a Hong Kong-flagged bulk carrier. Documents from our previous update show that the Navy believed that the Bass Strait was "likely using UAVs to conduct surveillance on US Naval Forces."

Enough said! That's all i need to know! :p It was always the Chinese after all!

Previous article:
 
2) Outer space origin.

That´s exactly what I told my wife when I discovered all those wormholes in our garden, but she doesn´t believe me and insists they are of
'Inner-earth' origin ... I fear she has been reading too much of those Tolkien fantasy-stories.

It was a very sunny lazy afternoon again...
 
UAP video from 2015 and the response:

2015 - We should look into this.

2016 - We really should look into this.

2017 - Somebody should look into this.

2018 - Ah, we'll look into it later.

2019 - Take cover! Virus!

2020 - Remember that thing we should look into?

2021 - Hey. We should put some people on TV to make vague comments. [Approved]

2022 - More vague comments are coming. Oops. There's one...
 
A blizzard of nothing
Under the measure, government employees and contractors get immunity when reporting "UFOs". But only after screening classified programs, activity, and references to any SAPs current, historical, and future. Leaving you with absolutely.....
 
Last edited:
As the article states, “silent swarm” was a separate exercise.
 
It
As the article states, “silent swarm” was a separate exercise.
It is worth noting that many of these documents are available on the Navy FOIA reading room:


As well as within the eFOIA system the Navy uses for requests and responses.
 
Why can't people accept the simple idea that a single origin does not satisfactorily explain all these separate incidents. Yes, some are most likely drones. Some might be projections. Some might indicate it's foreign powers at play. Some might be within US agencies. Some do not fit any of the above , waiting for further clarification. And if it doesn't fit any of the above, it doesn't mean aliens, neither do we have to intellectually force ourselves into some earthly origin when the facts of the matter do not support such explanation.
 
In other words - no news is good news. And those images are definite proof of uh... something. Could be anything.

No need to "rest assured" as if this problem has been solved to any degree of completeness.
 

Navy Says All UFO Videos Classified, Releasing Them ‘Will Harm National Security’​


The U.S. Navy says that releasing any additional UFO videos would “harm national security” and told a government transparency website that all of the government’s UFO videos are classified information.


In a Freedom of Information Act request response, the Navy told government transparency site The Black Vault that any public dissemination of new UFO videos “will harm national security as it may provide adversaries valuable information regarding Department of Defense/Navy operations, vulnerabilities, and/or capabilities. No portions of the videos can be segregated for release.”
..the Navy is admitting that it has more videos, and also gives a rationale for releasing three previous UFO videos.
“While three UAP videos were released in the past, the facts specific to those three videos are unique in that those videos were initially released via unofficial channels before official release”
 

Navy Says All UFO Videos Classified, Releasing Them ‘Will Harm National Security’​


The U.S. Navy says that releasing any additional UFO videos would “harm national security” and told a government transparency website that all of the government’s UFO videos are classified information.


In a Freedom of Information Act request response, the Navy told government transparency site The Black Vault that any public dissemination of new UFO videos “will harm national security as it may provide adversaries valuable information regarding Department of Defense/Navy operations, vulnerabilities, and/or capabilities. No portions of the videos can be segregated for release.”
..the Navy is admitting that it has more videos, and also gives a rationale for releasing three previous UFO videos.
“While three UAP videos were released in the past, the facts specific to those three videos are unique in that those videos were initially released via unofficial channels before official release”
'
Navy would rather not let everyone see their plasma projection system.
 
I doubt these are aliens.

The U.S. Navy has released 35 brief reports regarding various incidents involving its ships and facilities and unidentified small uncrewed aircraft systems, or sUASs, across the entire span of the Pacific between 2016 and 2021. Not all of the reports appear to be notable, and some are clearly innocuous, but others absolutely provide additional evidence of concerning trends that The War Zone has been actively reporting on in recent years. Among the newly released reports, for instance, is one that covers a worrying encounter that the Arleigh Burke class destroyer USS Paul Hamilton had with four drones in the Pacific off the coast of southern California in 2019, which you can read more about in our past reporting here.

 
 
Woo hoo!

Dear NASA,

This problem has existed since 1947. See the University of Colorado study on UFOs that was released in 1968, and published in paperback in 1969. Trust me, there is no good science in the Condon Report, just a lot of fake and made up conclusions. Their conclusion? That no gain to scientific knowledge will occur with further study. Find the Twining Memo from 1947, read it. Read its recommendation for more study.

Nothing has happened since 1947 and nothing will happen now. I guarantee it.
 
Woo hoo! I can't get enough of their vagueness.


1947 - Balloons.
2023 - Balloons.

Apparently, their ability to identify balloons using advanced sensors and imaging technology has gone downhill over the decades.
 
The following didn't actually happen:

This is Tiger 2 to Base. Come in.

"We read you Tiger 2. Go ahead."

I've got a UAP right in front of me.

"Describe it."

It's round.

"Any details or markings?"

Uh, it's a medium grey. No markings.

"Size estimate?"

About a hundred feet across.

"Tiger 2, NAVTEK has a weather balloon in your area."

Never mind.

-----------------------------

Later, at NAVTEK. Should we release a publication that shows pilots weather balloons under various lighting conditions?

Nah...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh, c'mon. Are these real objects? YES/NO
The U.S. Navy has released 72 heavily redacted reports regarding unidentified aircraft and other objects that its pilots encountered during various training sorties and other flight activities between 2004 and 2021.
If it is important to note that this batch of records does not cover all range fouler incidents recorded between 2004 and 2021.
The report on the "Tic Tac" and the briefing slide, the latter of which is entirely unredacted, offer new insights into one of the most deeply explored UAP sightings to date.
The description of the object in the now-released range fouler report describes it as such: "It was solid white, smooth, with no edges. It was uniformly colored with no nacelles, pylons, or wings. It was approximately 46 feet in length." Fravor, among others, has also claimed publicly that the 'Tic Tac' demonstrated highly unusual flight characteristics and other properties, and no firm explanation has been provided to date as to what the 'Tic Tac' actually was.
 

Attachments

  • tic-tac-range-fouler-report.png
    tic-tac-range-fouler-report.png
    325.3 KB · Views: 5
With a British tabloid newspaper as its source it must be true!!!

Now, the government is supposedly investigating reports of UFOs somehow deactivating nuclear warheads.

The Daily Mail claims that former U.S. Air Force personnel have testified that UFOs interfered with nukes in the 1960s. The officers reportedly recently told the government’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) that they had bizarre encounters with the objects near U.S. military bases.

 
I have another account about this. No warheads were shut down. Internal power was lost. And, apparently, backup power. This was associated with lights in the sky which were tentatively identified as unauthorized "helicopters." But none were reported as shot down.
 
Wow! This is definitely, possibly something - maybe...

 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom