XP67_Moonbat
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 16 January 2008
- Messages
- 2,262
- Reaction score
- 471
Nice!
XP67_Moonbat said:Nice find! It's high time we had something new in this thread.
hesham said:From ; Аэрокосмическое обозрение №06 (67) 2013
here is some MD hyprsonic concepts in colors.
XP67_Moonbat said:Prof C took those secrets to the grave. :-/
archipeppe said:Dear Hesham,
the illustration #3 is a mine one.
You can spot that the publisher has already respected the copyright (even with my name tranlsated in Russian!.
Ciao
Giuseppe
hesham said:From ; Аэрокосмическое обозрение №06 (67) 2013
here is some MD hyprsonic concepts in colors.
Anyone know the date of this release?Captures from Discovery Channel's The Real Flying Saucers documentary
Anyone know the date of this release?
Interesting historical note: The P&W competitor to the GE4 (SST engine) was a 57,000lb thrust duct burner.You find interesting designs while looking for other information. I was thinking of writing a book on the AMI program, but the book I'm working on now is taking so long, due to difficulty getting information, I don't see an AMI book happening, so there is no reason to hang on to these. I'm not sure they belong here, but it seems the other MAC AMI design studies are here so here are two more from THIS PDF At DTIC (A004214).
Mission A (The top image) is a duct burning Mach 3+ Interceptor and Mission B (The lower image) is an air-turbo-ramjet Mach 4+ interceptor.
2004Anyone know the date of this release?
I don't think this is it, or at least a different edit. Dr Czysz doesn't make an appearance as far as I can tell (unless it's very brief and I've skipped it)
Low Earth Orbit Reusable Launch Vehicle, what's CATS?I think would deserve to rest at 'Postwar Secret Projects' as they are not Aurora fantasies but actual concepts
They we're tech demo's not full on strike RECCE most would fly hypersonic for only a few minutes. Notice how large the inlets are sized compared to the rest of the vehicle. These vehicles had short range allowing just enough time to gather data on propulsion, TPS etc... MCD had a very well thought-out step-by-step progression for hypersonic development. Their lifting body/TOSS back booster MOL service plan was the most comprehensive TSTO VTOHL scheme I've ever seen. Based on high flight rate RLV’s it would be the prefect blueprint for a modern private enterprise LEO RLV CATS program. I would post pics however it is not mine to distribute publicly. Perhaps that information is out there buried in some old Air force DOD reports.
There's also the option of dumping LOX or other substances that will greatly decrease the temperature and will also increase the available oxygen content in the air to be compressed. Nitrous Oxide, N2O, is an option. Liquid is at -125degF/-90degC and it breaks into 2N2 and O2 at about 570degF/300degC. I think that's the MIPCC(?) turbofan concept.From a Paul Czysz paper in: "Scramjet Propulsion" (Cuirran and Murthy editors), Paul
discusses the McDD concept shown in the second picture:
"The resulting aircraft rather resembled the Canadian CF-106 Arrow (CF-105 actually) with very large inlets
and did not offer a significant research value with regard to fully integrated propulsion systems."
and then a little later - a very interesting observation - and RASCAL
was going in this direction, somewhat. Quoting Mr. Czysz again:
"All the afterburning turbojet/fans used in the HyFac study were conventional installations
where the airflow to the compressor increased in temperature and pressure. At about Mach
number 1.8, most compressors reach the point where the corrected speed for design efficiency
equals the machanical rotational speed limit of the compressor. At Mach numbers above this
point the mechanical speed is constant and the corrected compressor speed (N/sqrt(T/288K)
decreases. If there is a cryogenic heat exchange in the inlet between the inlet exit and
compressor entrance, then the temperature of the air entering the compressor can be kept at
that for best corrected speed, up to the Mach number limit where the heat exchanger can no
longer keep the temperature within limits. When such a turbojet is thermally integrated with a
rocket, there is no longer a transonic acceleration deficiency. This is not a classic definition of
a turbojet." I may also add, this is similar to what skylon is doing.
Were any these your possible RASCAL refs:
It's an American MiG-31!SHAZAM again!
More American MiG-31s!You find interesting designs while looking for other information. I was thinking of writing a book on the AMI program, but the book I'm working on now is taking so long, due to difficulty getting information, I don't see an AMI book happening, so there is no reason to hang on to these. I'm not sure they belong here, but it seems the other MAC AMI design studies are here so here are two more from THIS PDF At DTIC (A004214).
Mission A (The top image) is a duct burning Mach 3+ Interceptor and Mission B (The lower image) is an air-turbo-ramjet Mach 4+ interceptor.
Anyone know the date of this release?