Good Day All -

Wind tunnel test model of the YGBM-110 in the Vought Low Speed Wind Tunnel. Credit to the Vought Heritage Foundation.

Enjoy the Day! Mark
 

Attachments

  • zYBGM-110 Test 486 Run 062.jpg
    zYBGM-110 Test 486 Run 062.jpg
    669 KB · Views: 94
As an engineer,I do not think the rotate wing is a good idea.
Range depends on fuel, fuel depends on internal space. The wing needs too much internal space.
 
As an engineer,I do not think the rotate wing is a good idea.
Range depends on fuel, fuel depends on internal space. The wing needs too much internal space.
The competitor had a folding wing, which will use a comparable amount of space - the major differences being the actuating machinery and packing efficiency. I expect the LTV (and General Dynamics!) engineers did their own trade studies on the possible solutions before arriving at conclusions.
 
YBGM-110 was supposed to be launched without a canister. Was the increased structural weight (which I assume would be necessary to survive being launched from a torpedo tube) a good enough trade-off to regain the volume lost by the BGM-109s use of a canister?
 
IIRC,

YBGM-110 was built with a steel body, and thus can do w/o a canister for underwater launch.

while

YBGM-109 was built with an aluminum body, and thus has a steel outer canister for underwater launch.

I would think the steel vs aluminum body for the cruise missile would have impacted weights of the respective systems, which in turn affected the performance ...
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom