1970s
airlaunchedcruisemissile
cold war
ground launchedcruisemissile
submarine-launchedcruisemissile
united states
united states air force
united states army
united states navy
aero propulsion and power laboratory
aeronautical systems division
air force avionics laboratory
airlaunchedcruisemissile
cold war
strategic air command
united states
united states air force
It would drive the cost sky high and ensure it never got built. And 90% of the targets wouldn't require it anyway. The US is even retiring it's best cruise missiles (the stealthy AGM-129) rather than convert them to conventional. Not sure why. Only thing I can come up with is the idea of...
airlaunchedcruisemissile
cold war
ground launchedcruisemissile
post-cold war
submarine-launchedcruisemissile
united states air force
united states army
united states navy
Interesting. I seem to recall there was a proposed Russian cruise missile design that also used a propfan. The ol' memory is a bit fuzzy on the details, but I seem to recall some sort of mid-fuselage mounted prop.........
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.