Kawasaki P-X (P-1) and C-X (C-2)

Hi!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrUzmoK3Gto
 
Hi!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gzOcVSl_yEc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwM46EpkdFg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhp9-Acjgnw
 
red admiral said:
Multiple AESA within a non-rotating rotodome (so that would be just a 'dome') will give 360 deg coverage. This is not possible with the Wedgetail/Erieye configuration.


Wedgetail has a 360 coverage area.


http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/MESA/Documents/mesa.pdf
 
Wow!!
Hi c-2!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qBzBBV2pN-s
 
SpudmanWP said:
Wedgetail has a 360 coverage area.
http://www.northropgrumman.com/Capabilities/MESA/Documents/mesa.pdf

Not from the main array. You can't beat geometry.
 
There are endfire arrays in the top "surfboard" of the Wedgetail antenna system.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_AEW%26C

"The 10.8 m long by 3.4 m high antenna assembly incorporates 7.3 m long by 2.7 m high Side-Emitting Electronic Manifold array, with the top hat supporting array providing 120° coverage on port and starboard side, while the top hat array itself provides 60° fore and aft, thus providing a complete 360° coverage."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBppbwricvQ
 

Attachments

  • yourfile.gif
    yourfile.gif
    416.1 KB · Views: 142
TomS said:
There are endfire arrays in the top "surfboard" of the Wedgetail antenna system.

Which have massively smaller apertures than the main array and resulting far smaller ranges. The result is a gap in coverage fore and aft of the aircraft.
 
Here some pictures of the interior of Kawasaki P-1 Japanese maritime patrol aircraft. B)
Link: http://defence-blog.com/?p=6456
 
Hi!
 

Attachments

  • P-1 and P-8.jpg
    P-1 and P-8.jpg
    106.9 KB · Views: 1,038
  • P-1 COCKPIT.jpg
    P-1 COCKPIT.jpg
    252.8 KB · Views: 1,071
  • P-1 FRONT.jpg
    P-1 FRONT.jpg
    131.2 KB · Views: 1,097
  • P-1 in RAF Fairford base pic2.jpg
    P-1 in RAF Fairford base pic2.jpg
    181.9 KB · Views: 1,135
  • P-1 in RAF Fairford base.jpg
    P-1 in RAF Fairford base.jpg
    140 KB · Views: 1,184
The largest window of the world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcsdrsfxeNA
 

Attachments

  • 572c268b.jpg
    572c268b.jpg
    135.8 KB · Views: 104
  • CKArkkSWsAA9SrE.jpg
    CKArkkSWsAA9SrE.jpg
    16.2 KB · Views: 119
Hi! P-1 and P-8. It's so big that the size of the window of P-1 isn't believed. Also MAD is large.
The Japanese airplane is a gorgeous design unusually. ;D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwZNLvOinF8

http://aviationweek.com/blog/kawasaki-p-1-flies-air-tattoo
 

Attachments

  • 6b5ac5da.jpg
    6b5ac5da.jpg
    398.8 KB · Views: 155
  • 133998b6.jpg
    133998b6.jpg
    571.2 KB · Views: 171
  • 2015-08-04_2119.jpg
    2015-08-04_2119.jpg
    166.8 KB · Views: 129
  • JMSDF_P-1_5503_in_Kanoya.jpg
    JMSDF_P-1_5503_in_Kanoya.jpg
    761.1 KB · Views: 156
  • P-8A_of_VP-5_and_Japanese_Kawasaki_P-1_at_NAF_Atsugi_in_2014.jpg
    P-8A_of_VP-5_and_Japanese_Kawasaki_P-1_at_NAF_Atsugi_in_2014.jpg
    118.3 KB · Views: 171
  • AH0gkKg.jpg
    AH0gkKg.jpg
    159.2 KB · Views: 155
  • P-1 and P-8.jpg
    P-1 and P-8.jpg
    239.7 KB · Views: 164
Hi!
Source : JWings, No.205/9/2015
You can see many P-1 and C-2 interior pictures in this magazine.
 

Attachments

  • KAWASAKI P-1.jpg
    KAWASAKI P-1.jpg
    520.6 KB · Views: 202
  • 71H1p1EFONL.jpg
    71H1p1EFONL.jpg
    209.5 KB · Views: 163
The most comprehensive news presentation I've ever seen on an aircraft and I sure wish I knew what was being said. Cool floating graphics of the P-1 and P-8 being compared. The P-1 is my new favorite anti-submarine aircraft. Makes the P-8 look like warm milk. Anyone count the number of aircraft types in the story? Great shot of the F-18's shadow on the P-8.


Any chance of a translation?
 
Kawasaki Heavy Industries has announced the successful first flight of third prototype Kawasaki C-2 (68-1203) military transport aircraft in May 17, 2016 (Tuesday).
http://defence-blog.com/news/in-japan-hosted-the-first-flight-of-third-prototype-of-kawasaki-c-2.html
 

Attachments

  • Kawasaki C-2_68-1203_20160517.jpg
    Kawasaki C-2_68-1203_20160517.jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 158
Danke für die Info ! ;)
 
Re: Kawasaki C-2

Cockpit and cabin of the Kawasaki C-2 shown the Dubai Air Show 2017.
Source:
https://twitter.com/RAeSTimR/status/929639005595013125
Short video:
https://twitter.com/JeffMartinDC/status/929727676864188416
 

Attachments

  • 20171113_Kawasaki C-2_cockpit_DAS17_@RAeSTimR.jpg
    20171113_Kawasaki C-2_cockpit_DAS17_@RAeSTimR.jpg
    67.9 KB · Views: 114
  • 20171113_Kawasaki C-2_cabin_DAS17_@RAeSTimR.jpg
    20171113_Kawasaki C-2_cabin_DAS17_@RAeSTimR.jpg
    351.5 KB · Views: 124
Here some pictures of a successor of the NAMC YS-11EA/B for the Japan Air Self-Defense Force. It is based on the Kawasaki C-2.
Twitter: https://twitter.com/dougram2020/status/922797649807290370
 

Attachments

  • 20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_001.jpg
    20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_001.jpg
    41.8 KB · Views: 169
  • 20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_002.jpg
    20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_002.jpg
    192.7 KB · Views: 182
  • 20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_003.jpg
    20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_003.jpg
    122.9 KB · Views: 148
  • 20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_004.jpg
    20171024_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_concept_004.jpg
    84.7 KB · Views: 132
Taxi -Test :eek: B)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Gifu119V3/status/960801843549892609
Edit:
First flight on 2018-02-08. :) B)
Twitter: https://twitter.com/munbo327EJ/status/961594953812987904
 

Attachments

  • 20180208_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_ELINT_first_flight.jpg
    20180208_Kawasaki_C-2_EW_ELINT_first_flight.jpg
    204.4 KB · Views: 158
  • IMG_20180206_230705.jpg
    IMG_20180206_230705.jpg
    315.8 KB · Views: 198
https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/kawasaki-c-2-to-get-an-electronic-warfare-variant-454986/
 
Looks like the new Japanese C-2 is about 1.5 times the size of Brazil's KC390 transport. We wonder which country will export more transports????
 
Looks like the new Japanese C-2 is about 1.5 times the size of Brazil's KC390 transport. We wonder which country will export more transports????
Brazil, probably by a large margin. Size is not the end-all.
 
The C-2 would have a broader chance if it had it had tanker capability. Surely it's something they could add on and give the design higher flexibility. Hell, it's probably in the works for all we know.
 
How does the C-2 hit its STOL specs without an externally blown flap?

large T/W ratio provided by the CF-6 engine maybe ? The T/W based on wiki shows 0.4. quite considerable slightly more than B-1B and Tu-160 while basically twice the commercial jetliner.
 
How does the C-2 hit its STOL specs without an externally blown flap?

large T/W ratio provided by the CF-6 engine maybe ? The T/W based on wiki shows 0.4. quite considerable slightly more than B-1B and Tu-160 while basically twice the commercial jetliner.

Thanks. I'd forgotten how powerful their CF-6 variant is and how big those thrust reversers are.
 
on the subject of the P-X,
does anyone know why Kawasaki stopped development of the related YPX?

It was more or less a P-X with two engines, modified for commercial airlines.
the P-X is about the same size as the 737 and the YPX was claimed to be 15% cheaper to operate

Seeing as how the short range haul aircraft is the largest market and a ton of people are entering
I'm surprised Kawasaki doesn't continue its development especially as most of the airframe is 'proven'

size comparison
d0b7d51e.jpg


YPX
1598499139897.jpeg
 
Germany no longer interested in the P-1 because they think it can't get military certified in 5 years

 
More than likely a cover for the fact that the German MOD is highly unlikely to receive the funding to buy them any time soon.
 
You know, I really, really, really, like these aircraft, I'd rate both as first in their class, but I get the feeling that in 20 years people on this site will be talking about "what might have been" where they are concerned. Same goes for the Shinmeywa US-2.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom