Not the case. The ongoing F-X III contest winner is required to be the engineering consultant in the KFX project.
consultants don't pay the bills. Thats my point, if Korea wants to develop and manufacture its own aircraft thats fine, but it will come with additional costs compared to importing aircraft. I don't think thats heresy to say.
This is why the KFX development plan cannot be finalized until the winner of F-X III is announced.
The counter-ITAR strategy is already in place, namely EJ220 engine being the reference engine, local AESA and avionics prototypes already on display etc. Excluding the engine, 87% of it is already local.
but of course the development plan can't be finalized yet
At $233 million/unit offered FMS rate, almost anything is cheaper than the F-35.The Parliament is working on the Saab certified cost projection of $6 billion.
Ok so right there is 6 billion dollars spent. do you see my point? also if the block 1 is comparable to an F-18E/F, so lets compare it to that. Australia is talking about 24 more F-18E/Fs for $4 billion.
explain how that is cheaper? SAAB? I thought the consultant was the winner of the contest?
Parts ordering for F-15 and F-16 take more than 230 days, but it takes only 10 days for T-50.
But aren't there F-15 and F-16 parts made in Korea already? and you are telling me that when an F-16/F-15 needs a new part, its down for nearly 8 months?
If something breaks down on an imported jet they must send it back to the country of origin and wait up to a year to have it fixed.
what?!?!And I thought you just said you ordered the parts and it took 230 days? now you have to fly the aircraft back to its host nation an it takes up to a year? so which is it? Am I waiting on parts for 8 months or flying back to the manufacturer for a year?
This becomes even more confusing when you realize that F-16s are manufactured in SOUTH KOREA SINCE 1997. South Korea being one of 5 nations with an F-16 production facility.
http://www.f-16.net/f-16_users_article18.html
So my next question is, how are local F-16s drastically cheaper because they are manufactured locally both to buy and operate, and if the 8 months down/one year gone scenario is true, how bad is the state of local Korean aviation manufacturing?
Or can we all take a deep breath and realize what you said just isn't true?
In case of the T-50, the technician from the vendor drive to the base within hours of making the repair phone call.
Its the vendors fixing the aircraft?? Its not local forces? how about Samsung and the KF-16?
So when the ADD and the ROKAF project that a KFX would cost only 1/3rd of the Super Hornet to maintain and operate, it is entirely believable to them because of their prior experiences with a locally manufactured jet.
No I'm sorry that doesn't make sense aircraft parts are not expensive because they must be imported. The F-16s in the US at Hill AFB cost nearly the same amount to maintain as F-16s in Norway. Parts don't magically get super cheap because they are manufactured locally. slightly cheaper yes logistically simplified yes, 66 percent cheaper? Thats a stretch. I don't even think 1/3 operating cost would cover fuel... I don't even think a Gripen is 1/3 the cost of a super hornet, and its the cheapest combat aircraft to operate in the world.
Mach42 said:
1. I wouldn't put much stock in the aviationweek article. The information is largely comprised of stuff gleaned from the images posted in this thread and other English forums + google translate.
Fair enough
2. "twin engined 5th generation fighter" Twin-engine doesn't mean expensive and 5th generation is not clearly defined, you hang on those words like indicators of doom.
I beg your pardon but twin engine does mean more cost not just initially; It adds to maintenance, and fuel burn as well. Someone can correct me
3.
Paraphrase: 'It's going to be really expensive'. So? Is it not cost effective enough? What other option is there?
Importing is another option and its one Korea has previously used. If Korea wants to build their own aircraft, good for them... but it will cost more. please don't try to tell me that aircraft manufactured and used by home nations are magically cheaper. the US has some of the worlds largest air wings and even "local" and "bulk" discounts still carry high prices because that just the price of operating high end fighters. Korea won't escape that. If it costs 2 million dollars for a part, making it in korea doesn't suddenly mean it now only costs $.6 million.
Seeing as S Korea built the KF-16, can't we compare it apples to apples in every cost category including operation to a US built F-16 and see how much is spent locally vs export? and by what amount? Simple enough right?