HIMAT and the other AFTI Projects

From, Prediction methods for jet V/STOL propultion.
 

Attachments

  • 5.png
    5.png
    63.4 KB · Views: 262
hesham said:
From this report.
Click to expand...
No. It is not.

Please post the correct report cover or report link.

And please do this for your other two posts which display this report cover as a source. :mad:
 
Quite possibly! :cool:

I'm admit that being sent to a report (the original link) called "Dynamic response of a Mach 2.5 axisymmetric inlet and turbojet engine with a poppet-value controlled inlet stability bypass system when subjected to internal and external airflow transients" for a HiMat photo was ... aggravating. Especially since this was the third post today where this source report was incorrectly cited. The poster usually does such an good job and I appreciate his hard work.
 
From this report.
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    680.8 KB · Views: 55
  • 3.png
    3.png
    696.8 KB · Views: 56
  • 5.png
    5.png
    696.3 KB · Views: 58
  • 6.png
    6.png
    736.8 KB · Views: 55
  • 0.png
    0.png
    46.9 KB · Views: 84
.
 

Attachments

  • ECN-14284.jpg
    ECN-14284.jpg
    309.2 KB · Views: 76

Attachments

  • 36.jpg
    36.jpg
    113.5 KB · Views: 79
  • 35.jpg
    35.jpg
    46.6 KB · Views: 70
  • 34.jpg
    34.jpg
    111.2 KB · Views: 66
  • 33.jpg
    33.jpg
    36.6 KB · Views: 41
  • 32.jpg
    32.jpg
    136.6 KB · Views: 57
0gE9xEZSUk64tZU7hjnh.w.jpg

Pic from this post which also has a Sabrebat pic. From same shoot as first pic in this post it appears.
 
From Aviation magazine 1978.
 

Attachments

  • 7.png
    7.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 19
Having just skimmed through the thread, probably worth reminding people that AFTI wasn't solely aerodynamics and sensors. There was systems work going on as well, including some of the early GCAS work. I've got very vague memories that GEC Avionics did an AFTI/CAS specific OFP for the wide-angle HUD that was fitted to the F-16 AFTI/CAS, but I'd really only just joined the Airborne Displays Division at that point and wasn't being allowed to play with flight hardware yet. The new weapons delivery modes would almost certainly have required new symbology, as potentially would the GCAS work. I'm not sure if the EEGS*/Funnel Algorithm work being done in a locked room at the same time was also AFTI funded, but it would seem logical.

* Enhanced Envelope Gun Sight.
 
DWG said:
Having just skimmed through the thread, probably worth reminding people that AFTI wasn't solely aerodynamics and sensors. There was systems work going on as well, including some of the early GCAS work. I've got very vague memories that GEC Avionics did an AFTI/CAS specific OFP for the wide-angle HUD that was fitted to the F-16 AFTI/CAS, but I'd really only just joined the Airborne Displays Division at that point and wasn't being allowed to play with flight hardware yet. The new weapons delivery modes would almost certainly have required new symbology, as potentially would the GCAS work. I'm not sure if the EEGS*/Funnel Algorithm work being done in a locked room at the same time was also AFTI funded, but it would seem logical.

* Enhanced Envelope Gun Sight.
Click to expand...
View: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=o94L2Ml79nk&pp=ygUJRi0xNiBhZnRp


4:37
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom