Different lengths, 3.8m vs 4.37m.
Converting a Harpoon into a SLAM would involve giving it a new seeker section.
Last edited:
Different lengths, 3.8m vs 4.37m.
The whole point is to take the slam seeker and make it ground or / and air launched. If new trucks with longer tubes are needed building some shouldn't take more time then switching the seeker.Different lengths, 3.8m vs 4.37m.
Yeah but no Harpoon with Slam seeker or Harpoon with Slam seeker for ukraine? Atleast with the seeker they got better chances of hitting precise enemy Targets and for extra range one needs to revive Block 1D/Block II+ er engine, smaller warhead or all of it.I think a SLAM-ER has a longer fuel section though.
It might help a bit but the problem is that none of the really important targets are actually in Ukraine wrt defence production.Yeah but no Harpoon with Slam seeker or Harpoon with Slam seeker for ukraine? Atleast with the seeker they got better chances of hitting precise enemy Targets and for extra range one needs to revive Block 1D/Block II+ er engine, smaller warhead or all of it.
And ? With this they get some Air and capabilitys to strike deeper with more missiles over other systems.It might help a bit but the problem is that none of the really important targets are actually in Ukraine wrt defence production.
Hrm.SLAM has a problem in that it really prefers to have datalink back to the launch aircraft, which needs to hang around and help the missile lock on to its target (Yes, the ER does have automatic target acquisition, but it's primarily intended to help the pilot refine the target aimpoint, not to guide the missile totally autonomously). In the air threat environment Ukraine is dealing with, SLAM might not be highly survivable.
Hrm.
How many drones is Ukraine able to keep airborne at decent altitude? Datalink back to the drone and from drone to ground?
Then again the AWW-13 Advanced Data Link pod is both pushing north of 2 decades now and does 12 other functions besides being a datalink for the Slamer.It's a beefy pod, around 700 pounds. A drone that can tote that would be an easy target for the same SAMs that would be gunning for the launch aircraft.
Depends on how many items in the SLAM have a lifespan, and how many SLAMs there are nearing that lifespan.Then again the AWW-13 Advanced Data Link pod is both pushing north of 2 decades now and does 12 other functions besides being a datalink for the Slamer.
You can likely par that down a whole lot with modern gear and focusing on just guiding tge SLAM instead needing to also needing to translate for the Fighter and along with receiving/sending data from like several legacy non link 16 systems like the U2.
Through in that it easier to have the Drone play relay to a ground station?
Very doable if they want.
But the SLAM is one of the Navy main beat sticks so I don't think those are being sent anytime soon.
TAIPEI (Taiwan News) – The first of 100 land-based Harpoon anti-ship missile systems ordered from the United States have arrived in Kaohsiung, reports said Saturday (Sept. 28).
The first delivery occurred Friday (Sept. 27), with the equipment being unloaded at Kaohsiung Port, per the Liberty Times. There was no immediate word on which part of the missile systems had arrived.
The US approved the sale of 400 RTM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II missiles, four RTM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II maneuver missiles, 100 launcher transporter units, and 25 radar trucks in 2020. The first phase of deliveries, to be completed in 2026, included 128 missiles, with the second and final phase expected by the end of 2028.
The Ministry of National Defense had budgeted the full package at NT$71.02 billion (US$2.24 billion), but an extra NT$15 billion needed to be spent on building the bases to house the missiles
400 RTM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II missiles, four RTM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II maneuver missiles
Shouldn't that be RGM-84L-4?
It is 400 RGM-84 rounds, and 4 RTM practice round .....
Does that mean they only have a single salvo for the launchers?
Yes. But it means 400 missiles in the air for the Chinese armada to deal with.Does that mean they only have a single salvo for the launchers?
I honestly don't expect those launchers to be intact long enough to be reloaded if a fight kicks off.
Requires the launchers to be on trucks, or have trucks hooked up to the trailers. And being a moving vehicle anywhere near the area that a bunch of AShMs launched from is going to make me want to shoot it on general principles.Unless they do a "Shoot and scoot" routine.
Requires the launchers to be on trucks, or have trucks hooked up to the trailers. And being a moving vehicle anywhere near the area that a bunch of AShMs launched from is going to make me want to shoot it on general principles.
Requires the launchers to be on trucks, or have trucks hooked up to the trailers.
The statement was that it would be worth buying reloads for the launchers if they were capable of doing a shoot and scoot.These are not truck based launchers?!?
The statement was that it would be worth buying reloads for the launchers if they were capable of doing a shoot and scoot.
Shoot and scoot launchers require either being mounted on a truck or to have a truck hooded up to the trailer kingpin, ready to drive away as soon as the launcher fires.
The US is the only user of RGM-84Q-4 Harpoon's right?