F-104 Starfighter Projects

[Dynoman]

Although the vast majority of the video is about ZEL, at 8:54 the catapult launch using the SATS system is shown.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCbegiIhLGg

 

[riggerrob]

Circa 1993, NASA (Edwards Air Force Base in California) modified a two-seater Starfighter by adding a TV camera under the nose. They wanted to test if a TV camera was a viable alternative to the tilting nose on the Concorde SST. One problem was that the TV monitor inside the rear cockpit risked hitting the rear-seater if he had to eject, so NASA contracted with Butler Parachute Systems to build a custom wedge-shaped pilot emergency parachute for this one-off Starfighter. The reverse wedge parachute container was 3 or 4 inches thick across the top, but tapered to zero at the bottom to allow the rear-seat pilot to slide his hips as far aft as possible ... to minimize the risk of his knees hitting the TV monitor.
The project was cancelled when NASA's sole remaining Starfighter developed engine troubles.

While packing for Mr. Butler, I assembled dozens of other custom wedge-shaped parachute containers to adapt a wide variety of second-owners to fit existing cockpits. Try to picture a "well-nourished Texan" trying to squeeze into a cockpit originally designed to accept a Yugoslav jockey.
Hah!
Hah!

 

[Scott Kenny]

While packing for Mr. Butler, I assembled dozens of other custom wedge-shaped parachute containers to adapt a wide variety of second-owners to fit existing cockpits. Try to picture a "well-nourished Texan" trying to squeeze into a cockpit originally designed to accept a Yugoslav jockey.
Hah!
Hah!

Ground crew issued some large shoehorns?

 

[datafuser]

A F-104A with a HM-55 (AIM-26B) missile in the October 1966 issue of Air Review, a Japanese magazine.

 

[MadRat]

Lockheed CL-1200 Lancer derivative of f-104 for

Lightweight Fighter program View attachment 660421​

The tail and nose look awesome. The rest looks like barf. A simple wing like the original and the original intakes would have been plausible. But this advancement in all aspects of the design was horrible. They could have had the F-16 of its day.

I know some will disagree but F-104S was the apex of Starfighter. Six AAMs and wingtip tanks. Pure bad ass. A raw interceptor in the prime of the 'multipurpose' fighters. Couldn't find it with wingtip tanks but here is underwing tanks and six AAM.

Just needed the CL-1200 tail, a bigger radar, and the Super Phantom's PW1120 to give it both thrust and electrical output as F-104S was maxxed out. Super Starlancer ftw.

https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/lockheed-cl-1200-x-27-lancer.832/

 

[kocovgoce]

plus an aircraft control computer, composite material wings

 

[publiusr]

Canards maybe?

 

[F.L.]

Canards maybe?

Yes, look higher up in the thread.

 

[Kiltonge]

Cost data for the austere F-104-17 proposed as Mutual Defence-funded fighter, from AvWeek 19 March 1962. A substantial saving:

"Northrop has said in the past that it can offer a day-fighter version of the N-156 for approximately $450,000 if assured of a production run for at least 1,000 aircraft.

Lockheed reportedly has placed a price tag of about $550,000 on the F-104-17. The F-104-17 is an F-104G with the all-weather fire control and navigation systems removed. These units, which cost $385,000 per aircraft, could be installed at a later date if the individual countries decided to build up their all-weather capabilities.

 

[Kiltonge]

Also from AvWeek: the CL-521 VTOL variant mentioned up-thread was proposed to NATO in conjunction with Shorts, who by then had a reputation for VTOL that Lockheed lacked.

 

[Scott Kenny]

Cost data for the austere F-104-17 proposed as Mutual Defence-funded fighter, from AvWeek 19 March 1962. A substantial saving:

"Northrop has said in the past that it can offer a day-fighter version of the N-156 for approximately $450,000 if assured of a production run for at least 1,000 aircraft.

Lockheed reportedly has placed a price tag of about $550,000 on the F-104-17. The F-104-17 is an F-104G with the all-weather fire control and navigation systems removed. These units, which cost $385,000 per aircraft, could be installed at a later date if the individual countries decided to build up their all-weather capabilities.

Frack, even back in the day systems were 41% of airframe costs?!?

 

[BlackBat242]

Frack, even back in the day systems were 41% of airframe costs?!?

Yep.

 

[datafuser]

Just curious, was there any attempt to put a new pulse-Doppler radar in existing F-104Gs in the 1970's?

 

[TomcatViP]

F-104S-ASA

The F-104ASA (Aggiornamento Sistemi d'Arma, Weapon Systems Update), developed in 1986, introduced a FIAR R21G/M1 Setter radar,[9] with 'look-down' capability and compatibility with the Selenia Aspide missile. AIM-9Ls were then used as the main armament, replacing the previous "B" and "F" version of this missile, while the older AIM-7s were retained. One AIM-7 was usually carried under each wing. In total, 147 of the F-104S airframes were converted to ASA standard at an expense of around 600 billion lire, the last ASA model was delivered in the early 1990s.

View: https://youtu.be/OFJ-W7LcpYs?si=jb-lok9STGa2k-Qs

Aeritalia F-104S Starfighter - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

 

[TJDougherty01]

F-104 at March Air Field Museum.

 

[Dynoman]

The JF-104A with the ALSOR (Air Launched SOunding Rocket) experiment to launch a sounding rocket with a balloon payload that would deploy and descent allowing researchers to measure the density of the upper atmosphere. Test Pilot Milt Thompson piloted the aircraft that later experienced an asymmetrical flap deflection that resulted in the loss of the aircraft. A number of ALSOR flights were successfully flown.

 

[Dynoman]

Proposed RFT-104G that the German Air Force had considered a two seat G-model F-104 with a podded SLAR and camera under the aircraft centerline. This model is a 'what-if" it was built.