
Biden To Pitch EV Plan During Visit To Ford Rouge Electric Vehicle Center
President Joe Biden will pitch his EV plan during his visit to the Ford Rouge Electric Vehicle Center today as he gets a sneak peek at the F-150 Lightning.

The only true ecological cars are those that are in the parking lots.In order to improve things, people sometimes need a nudge in the right direction. EVs reduce pollution and enable energy independence. Both of these are good things.
It's stupid. They shouldn't do it.The rest of the world is going electric, Ford, and America, either gets with the program, or loses its foreign markets within the next decade
Yes, R2R in general needs more support and for mass-market EVs even moreso.Right to repair does need to be addressed in the EV market with companies like Tesla, but otherwise I'm all for them becoming the standard.
How do you feel about less car-centric urban design, then?However, I keep repeating that no one can force another person to buy something they don't want. And that the only green cars are those parked.
The problem I'm seeing with current pedestrian-focused urban design, such as the '15 minute city' (everything you need walkable within 15 minutes), is a tendency to forget, or in some cases outright dismiss, the needs of people who can't get everywhere on foot. I'd be happy to see pedestrian-focused urban design with accessible mass transit, but that needs to come with an understanding that for some people reliable and safe walking distance is measured in the very low tens of metres, and that for those of us who are wheelchair users any steps or any slope over 1 in 10 is a no go zone. In practise that means some form of vehicle access is needed pretty much everywhere. It doesn't need to be general access, you could restrict it to accessible electric taxis, but it needs to be there or you start shutting disabled people out of cities.How do you feel about less car-centric urban design, then?However, I keep repeating that no one can force another person to buy something they don't want. And that the only green cars are those parked.
OTOH its pretty simple to restrict what people can buy, as the UK has done by ruling no sales of internal combustion engine only vehicles post 2030. I strongly suspect that will be expanded to hybrids as well. No one will be forced to buy one, but if you want a new car post-2030 ....However, I keep repeating that no one can force another person to buy something they don't want. And that the only green cars are those parked.
Oil could also be produced by capturing carbon dioxide from the air, seas and oceans.I'm not a great fan of EV because methanol or ammonia could substitute to gasoline more easily, in IC cars and hybrids.
Main problem is to produce these fuels without CO2 (ammonia) or famine (methanol)...
Why no E85 / hybrid cars, btw ? sounds good to me. Even classic IC cars can be run on E85.
This would turn hydrocarbons from an energy source to an energy transfer medium, like hydrogen. Are there any new developments on artificial photosynthesis or biofuel technology?Oil could also be produced by capturing carbon dioxide from the air, seas and oceans.I'm not a great fan of EV because methanol or ammonia could substitute to gasoline more easily, in IC cars and hybrids.
Main problem is to produce these fuels without CO2 (ammonia) or famine (methanol)...
Why no E85 / hybrid cars, btw ? sounds good to me. Even classic IC cars can be run on E85.
Why produce a complex hydrocarbon, when you can use the same enegy directly, or to generate hydrogen or simple alcohols? Oil is far from the most efficient target for that kind of process, and would have the same pollution issues as existing oil-based fuels.Oil could also be produced by capturing carbon dioxide from the air, seas and oceans.I'm not a great fan of EV because methanol or ammonia could substitute to gasoline more easily, in IC cars and hybrids.
Main problem is to produce these fuels without CO2 (ammonia) or famine (methanol)...
Why no E85 / hybrid cars, btw ? sounds good to me. Even classic IC cars can be run on E85.
In order to improve things, people sometimes need a nudge in the right direction. EVs reduce pollution and enable energy independence. Both of these are good things.
There is actually, though its all still very small scale. Large Macroalgae's like Kelp seem to be hot ticket for carbon sequestration, aquaculture, and bio fuel crops. It grows incredibly quick and requires no input asides from an upswell current, downsides are the development of infrastructure to keep it in place and it can be finicky with water temperatures requirements.This would turn hydrocarbons from an energy source to an energy transfer medium, like hydrogen. Are there any new developments on artificial photosynthesis or biofuel technology?Oil could also be produced by capturing carbon dioxide from the air, seas and oceans.I'm not a great fan of EV because methanol or ammonia could substitute to gasoline more easily, in IC cars and hybrids.
Main problem is to produce these fuels without CO2 (ammonia) or famine (methanol)...
Why no E85 / hybrid cars, btw ? sounds good to me. Even classic IC cars can be run on E85.
In the same order it was said that Solar Cells were bad because they couldn't be recycled, well the truth is they weren't being recycled, not because they couldn't be but because the supply of surplus, aged out cells was insufficient to initiate industrial scale recycling. The thing is now earlier generation cells are starting to be recycled in large quantities it has actually been discovered that they are highly recyclable with less wastage and greater efficiency that many if not most other modern products.Recycling li-ion batteries hasn't been done on a large scale yet because by and large, the first generation li-ion batteries still in use. And after they're removed from cars, they get a second life as home batteries (because the reduced capacity is less of a problem in stationary applications). You'll see the industry ramp up when the supply of dead batteries starts growing.
Pardon me but, limiting the solution to ONE route of development will extend the problem. There ARE clean fuels for ICE vehicles already and we can for example harvest the green algae blooms in our oceans, turning another problem into part of the solution. What is causing this tunnel vision is blindly following those who have a vested financial interest in a one path policy. Lemmings do NOT have it right.
Electric cars are also heavily subsidized. Without subsidies they are like Tony Stark without his armor. Please don't even try to talk about global warming as I read in previous comments. Really, don't do it.
Because I hate vulgar and radical Greenpeace-style environmentalism. Is it so hard to understand? Tom Clancy had foreseen all this in "Rainbow six".Electric cars are also heavily subsidized. Without subsidies they are like Tony Stark without his armor. Please don't even try to talk about global warming as I read in previous comments. Really, don't do it.
Electric cars are on the verge of being economically viable without subsidies. They got to that point because subsidies allowed the industry to ramp up supply, by creating demand.
And why shouldn't we talk about global warming? Electrification is an excellent method for lowering CO2 emissions, mainly because electric powertrains are vastly more efficient than ICEs.
So in a nutshell you are opposed to electric cars and emissions reductions because people you don't like / fear are in favour of them?Because I hate vulgar and radical Greenpeace-style environmentalism. Is it so hard to understand? Tom Clancy had foreseen all this in "Rainbow six".Electric cars are also heavily subsidized. Without subsidies they are like Tony Stark without his armor. Please don't even try to talk about global warming as I read in previous comments. Really, don't do it.
Electric cars are on the verge of being economically viable without subsidies. They got to that point because subsidies allowed the industry to ramp up supply, by creating demand.
And why shouldn't we talk about global warming? Electrification is an excellent method for lowering CO2 emissions, mainly because electric powertrains are vastly more efficient than ICEs.
Got it, the drive to electric is to reduce the presence of US in OUR cars. Electric of itself as a propulsion form is already begining to fall away with alternatives that are just as green or better, some just happen to include batteries in the direct drive process. The truth as you stated in the link is to make US the lemmings and put us on public transport which cannot carry the current load, let alone present changes and I have zero access for one. My fifty year old VW does few miles and has a better carbon footprint than many new cars due to the fact that it has not been replaced many time with associated carbon impact and is reduced in mileage and maintained properly. Sometimes people admire the car for being unuual and 'quirky' but other times I get harrassed in the street/car park by zealots who want to burn her. What will THAT due to their carbon footprint?Pardon me but, limiting the solution to ONE route of development will extend the problem. There ARE clean fuels for ICE vehicles already and we can for example harvest the green algae blooms in our oceans, turning another problem into part of the solution. What is causing this tunnel vision is blindly following those who have a vested financial interest in a one path policy. Lemmings do NOT have it right.
See my post HERE :-
cheers,
Robin.
Sure, and they also want to eliminate cattle farms. Those too are victims of environmental fury.So in a nutshell you are opposed to electric cars and emissions reductions because people you don't like / fear are in favour of them?Because I hate vulgar and radical Greenpeace-style environmentalism. Is it so hard to understand? Tom Clancy had foreseen all this in "Rainbow six".Electric cars are also heavily subsidized. Without subsidies they are like Tony Stark without his armor. Please don't even try to talk about global warming as I read in previous comments. Really, don't do it.
Electric cars are on the verge of being economically viable without subsidies. They got to that point because subsidies allowed the industry to ramp up supply, by creating demand.
And why shouldn't we talk about global warming? Electrification is an excellent method for lowering CO2 emissions, mainly because electric powertrains are vastly more efficient than ICEs.
Ok forget about global warming etc. what about smog, exhaust particulates etc. known carcinogens that cause very nasty cancers? What about the fact that we need oil for chemicals and materials that we cant survive without these days, shouldn't we be conserving it for that instead of just burning it?
By the way I am a complete petrol head, love cars ,love driving fast, pride myself in having one of the fastest cars where I live, one lucky bloke has a lambo, but there's another with a faster car than mine, a Tesla 3. Reality is is, if I want to keep driving fast cars I will need to go electric within the next several years.
Well cows do fart an awful lot but its likely more related to the land clearing associated with cattle, i.e. burning forests, creating smoke that drifts across countries and again, deposits particulates that cause nasty diseases.Sure, and they also want to eliminate cattle farms. Those too are victims of environmental fury.So in a nutshell you are opposed to electric cars and emissions reductions because people you don't like / fear are in favour of them?Because I hate vulgar and radical Greenpeace-style environmentalism. Is it so hard to understand? Tom Clancy had foreseen all this in "Rainbow six".Electric cars are also heavily subsidized. Without subsidies they are like Tony Stark without his armor. Please don't even try to talk about global warming as I read in previous comments. Really, don't do it.
Electric cars are on the verge of being economically viable without subsidies. They got to that point because subsidies allowed the industry to ramp up supply, by creating demand.
And why shouldn't we talk about global warming? Electrification is an excellent method for lowering CO2 emissions, mainly because electric powertrains are vastly more efficient than ICEs.
Ok forget about global warming etc. what about smog, exhaust particulates etc. known carcinogens that cause very nasty cancers? What about the fact that we need oil for chemicals and materials that we cant survive without these days, shouldn't we be conserving it for that instead of just burning it?
By the way I am a complete petrol head, love cars ,love driving fast, pride myself in having one of the fastest cars where I live, one lucky bloke has a lambo, but there's another with a faster car than mine, a Tesla 3. Reality is is, if I want to keep driving fast cars I will need to go electric within the next several years.