flight path actually was sub hypersonic. The terminal dive all but certainly is sub Mach 5 just due to atmospheric density.
Every time the RV manoeuvres it loses energy and hence slows down.
flight path actually was sub hypersonic. The terminal dive all but certainly is sub Mach 5 just due to atmospheric density.
Every time the RV manoeuvres it loses energy and hence slows down.
There was mention that it could be upgraded to kill ships.Chances are that happens anyway in the dive to the target. The 2017 test had an average speed of Mach 6, which implies a large part of the flight path actually was sub hypersonic. The terminal dive all but certainly is sub Mach 5 just due to atmospheric density.
I have no information on the guidance mode; I suspect it is INS/GPS only, maybe with a datalink with target updates (though that probably also requires sub hypersonic speeds).
There was mention that it could be upgraded to kill ships.
Not at baseline. There are however efforts that have looked at that so there is growth opportunity.Will the Dark Eagle kill vehicle have a terminal seeker for moving targets?
The Ops Demo, the capstone event of the ATF series, tested the proper function of the ARRW through all phases of flight, with all aspects of employment executed by operational personnel. The Air Force used operational aircrews to complete mission planning, operational maintenance personnel to handle and maintain the ARRW, and operational aircraft armament personnel to upload and downloadt he ARRW to/from a B-52H during the test. To support the Ops Demo, the Air Force provided training to the maintenance personnel and executed a maintenance demonstration.The Air Force is in the final stages of conducting analysis of test data that captured missile and glider flight characteristics as well as warhead performance and comparing the observed results to modeling and simulation (M&S) results. Lethality of the ARRW system will be evaluated based on the test data and various M&S tools developed to support ARRW system capability. The Air Force used engagementlevel and mission-level M&S toassess ARRW survivability in anti access/area-denial environments.No operational cyber assessment was completed. If program elements undergo further development, a cyber assessment must be executed in future developmental iterations.
Preliminary results indicate that the ARRW weapon system demonstrated sufficient mission capability in a permissive environment. From the combined data set, the Air Force demonstrated the ARRW would be able to satisfy the required launch platform release conditions, downrange and cross-range requirements, and the time to place effects on target requirements that are needed to support the strike mission. Due to the limited number of ATF assets (i.e., AUR vehicles),however, there are insufficient datat o determine weapon accuracy with statistical confidence from current operational testing. Moreover, the Ops Demo indicated that operational personnel could plan a mission and execute a strike on surrogate targets.
Not a lot of information in the public arena on that one. Based on what is known about the materials being used, the glide body geometry and the speeds involved, it is unlikely that it has a terminal seeker.
Would it fit? Aren't the missiles we think are carrying it much larger?Isn’t it using the AHW glide vehicle?
Would it fit? Aren't the missiles we think are carrying it much larger?
Isn't the hypersonic glide-body used by the Dark Eagle basically a finned biconic RV?
The “dark eagle” glide body is the “ Common Hypersonic Glide Body” which is a development of the AHW, which was based on SWERVE, which 40 years ago demonstrated some aspects of terminal (counter-air) seeking, GPS-INS guidance and communication throughout the flight envelope.