... there will definitely be new information about UAC's LFI/PLIB.
Why "definitely"?
It is two years since the signing of the memorandum. There sure will be questions to Chemezov.
... there will definitely be new information about UAC's LFI/PLIB.
Why "definitely"?
... there will definitely be new information about UAC's LFI/PLIB.
Why "definitely"?
... there will definitely be new information about UAC's LFI/PLIB.
Why "definitely"?
Cooperation continues, but the contract has not yet been signed. For now.
Manturov for Kommersant:
— Что конкретно вы будете обсуждать с руководством ОАЭ? Ранее говорилось, что Россия и ОАЭ продолжают обсуждать сделку по Су-35 и совместное создание легкого истребителя пятого поколения.
— Могу сказать без конкретики по обозначенным вами темам: у нас есть двусторонняя повестка и есть совместные проекты. Но мы стараемся ничего не озвучивать первыми до достижения договоренностей с другой стороной.
«ÐапÑÑжение давно наÑоÑло Ñак, ÑÑо дополниÑелÑно оÑÑенков Ñже не замеÑаеÑÑ»
ÐиниÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑомÑÑленноÑÑи и ÑоÑговли ÐÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐанÑÑÑов об ÑкÑпоÑÑе вооÑÑжениÑwww.kommersant.ru
No.... there will definitely be new information about UAC's LFI/PLIB.
Why "definitely"?
Cooperation continues, but the contract has not yet been signed. For now.
Manturov for Kommersant:
— Что конкретно вы будете обсуждать с руководством ОАЭ? Ранее говорилось, что Россия и ОАЭ продолжают обсуждать сделку по Су-35 и совместное создание легкого истребителя пятого поколения.
— Могу сказать без конкретики по обозначенным вами темам: у нас есть двусторонняя повестка и есть совместные проекты. Но мы стараемся ничего не озвучивать первыми до достижения договоренностей с другой стороной.
«ÐапÑÑжение давно наÑоÑло Ñак, ÑÑо дополниÑелÑно оÑÑенков Ñже не замеÑаеÑÑ»
ÐиниÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑомÑÑленноÑÑи и ÑоÑговли ÐÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐанÑÑÑов об ÑкÑпоÑÑе вооÑÑжениÑwww.kommersant.ru
Still no news at IDEX?
... there will definitely be new information about UAC's LFI/PLIB.
Why "definitely"?
Cooperation continues, but the contract has not yet been signed. For now.
Manturov for Kommersant:
— Что конкретно вы будете обсуждать с руководством ОАЭ? Ранее говорилось, что Россия и ОАЭ продолжают обсуждать сделку по Су-35 и совместное создание легкого истребителя пятого поколения.
— Могу сказать без конкретики по обозначенным вами темам: у нас есть двусторонняя повестка и есть совместные проекты. Но мы стараемся ничего не озвучивать первыми до достижения договоренностей с другой стороной.
«ÐапÑÑжение давно наÑоÑло Ñак, ÑÑо дополниÑелÑно оÑÑенков Ñже не замеÑаеÑÑ»
ÐиниÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑомÑÑленноÑÑи и ÑоÑговли ÐÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐанÑÑÑов об ÑкÑпоÑÑе вооÑÑжениÑwww.kommersant.ru
Still no news at IDEX?
hummmm……I‘ve seen a exciting stealth fighter design that prepare to use a NK-32-02.Um, no. Mass effectiveness of NK-32 is low and not for fighter-sized aircraft. Plus said mass is for additinal spool intended for long AFB flight, which fughter doesn't need.NK-32-02 is in the sky, so just about time to build a fighter around it.
If you're going to make an single-engine aircraft, - Izd.30 is a best choice. If it has 180kN thrust as advertised, it's the best contender. Plus unification with Su-57 which would lower overall cost.
hummmm……I‘ve seen a exciting stealth fighter design that prepare to use a NK-32-02.Um, no. Mass effectiveness of NK-32 is low and not for fighter-sized aircraft. Plus said mass is for additinal spool intended for long AFB flight, which fughter doesn't need.NK-32-02 is in the sky, so just about time to build a fighter around it.
If you're going to make an single-engine aircraft, - Izd.30 is a best choice. If it has 180kN thrust as advertised, it's the best contender. Plus unification with Su-57 which would lower overall cost.
The "principally new" aircraft mentioned in the article is this.So at MAKS 2021?
Here is it!
Sukhoi's new light fighter:
- VLO design
- single engine w TVC
- supermanouverability
- TOW < 18 t
- max. speed > 2M
...
According to previous info it will be a optionally manned machine. Eventually with VC/3S version of Izd. 30 development... Russia's sixth generation ligth? WOW!
Источник: Ростех создает однодвигательный легкий сверхзвуковой истребитель-"невидимку"
Самолет будет развивать максимальную скорость полета более 2 маховwww.google.com
No, just a "cheap" 5+ gen fighter mostly for foreign market.Russia's sixth generation ligth? WOW!
No, just a "cheap" 5+ gen fighter mostly for foreign market.Russia's sixth generation ligth? WOW!
Here is it!
Sukhoi's new light fighter:
- VLO design
- single engine w TVC
- supermanouverability
- TOW < 18 t
- max. speed > 2M
...
According to previous info it will be a optionally manned machine. Eventually with VC/3S version of Izd. 30 development... Russia's sixth generation ligth? WOW!
Источник: Ростех создает однодвигательный легкий сверхзвуковой истребитель-"невидимку"
Самолет будет развивать максимальную скорость полета более 2 маховwww.google.com
So what happens to the MiG light fighter? Or with they be involved in a fly off against each other?
Here is it!
Sukhoi's new light fighter:
- VLO design
- single engine w TVC
- supermanouverability
- TOW < 18 t
- max. speed > 2M
...
According to previous info it will be a optionally manned machine. Eventually with VC/3S version of Izd. 30 development... Russia's sixth generation ligth? WOW!
Источник: Ростех создает однодвигательный легкий сверхзвуковой истребитель-"невидимку"
Самолет будет развивать максимальную скорость полета более 2 маховwww.google.com
So what happens to the MiG light fighter? Or with they be involved in a fly off against each other?
Who knows. But it is likely that MiG is waiting with LMFS for new opportunities. By the way, there are currently interesting discussions in Russia, when the existence of a new deck fighter project is necessary for the building of the new aircraft carrier. MiG works with twin-engine concepts and has gained vast experience with the K/KUB...
ВЗГЛЯД.РУ - В ВПК назвали сроки строительства российского авианосца
Новый российский авианосец можно будет построить за десять лет, если будут готовы завод и палубный истребитель, сообщил член коллегии Военно-промышленной комиссии России, член Морской коллегии при правительстве Владимир Поспелов.www.google.com
Having the izd. 30 as engine the export part of it may be also questionable, at least in a first step.Not so cheap, but surely cheaper than Su-57. There is the intention of high degree of unification with Felon.
Ad pic: Unfortunately, there is no new image than this notorious cut from the photo of Borisov's table. Let's wait, just 54 days...
I think Sukhoi goes for the single engine plane using izd. 30 and the PAK-FA technologies, while MiG goes for a 5G plane based on the MiG-29 and maybe using the -35 as risk reduction, this would demand Klimov to develop their own 5G engine or UEC to scale the core of the izd.30. It seemed a given that MiG would take care of this project, but latest news (from Rostec and UEC too) seem to put that into questionSo what happens to the MiG light fighter? Or with they be involved in a fly off against each other?
Not really. It just shows usual for literally everyone P/W flexing with it being listed at minimal, rarely normal load, and not at MTOW.TWR of 1 by 18 t weight suggests rather clearly that the izd. 30 is indeed a 18 tf engine
Who's going to pay the development fees? Definitely not the MOD, maybe it's a good option for the UAE if their F-35 buy falls through.Having the izd. 30 as engine the export part of it may be also questionable, at least in a first step.Not so cheap, but surely cheaper than Su-57. There is the intention of high degree of unification with Felon.
Ad pic: Unfortunately, there is no new image than this notorious cut from the photo of Borisov's table. Let's wait, just 54 days ...
BTW, RIA has reported that the plane will have one ventral intake, so it matches as of now what we saw on Borisov's desk
TWR of 1 by 18 t weight suggests rather clearly that the izd. 30 is indeed a 18 tf engine, not bad (this is consistent with old statements by Marchukov regarding the TWR of the new engine)
I think Sukhoi goes for the single engine plane using izd. 30 and the PAK-FA technologies, while MiG goes for a 5G plane based on the MiG-29 and maybe using the -35 as risk reduction, this would demand Klimov to develop their own 5G engine or UEC to scale the core of the izd .thirty. It seemed a given that MiG would take care of this project, but latest news (from Rostec and UEC too) seem to put that into questionSo what happens to the MiG light fighter? Or with they be involved in a fly off against each other?
It is far from a hard confirmation I agree. But TWR at empty weight >1 is trivial with essentially any engine and is currently above 1.5 and approaching 2 for the latest models. RIA noted explicitly 18 t was NTOW, which makes sense because such a plane may perfectly have a MTOW slightly above 20 t. Obviously weight empty is not 18 t for a plane that size. Marchukov said long time ago that the new engine would have a specific weight 30% lower than izd. 117S, that means the engine is most likely around 17 -18 tf thrust. It seems a lot but it is increasingly supported by harder and softer evidenceNot really. It just shows usual for literally everyone P/W flexing with it being listed at minimal, rarely normal load, and not at MTOW.
VKS has been talking about a light fighter for ages and offering izd. 30 is not what I would call a cheap export plane. IMHO this is clearly a program waiting for MoD to be convinced to pay for it, as it has almost always been the case with Russian weapons.trose213 said:Who's going to pay the development fees? Definitely not the MOD, maybe it's a good option for the UAE if their F-35 buy falls through.
I must have missed where VKS decided it is ok with single engine planes again?
Where did they say it is not ok? Genuine question, I have never seen any statement about such doctrine being in place. I guess if you have been flying thousands of single engine fighters for decades, it is a bit peculiar all of a sudden to realize that was not acceptable...I must have missed where VKS decided it is ok with single engine planes again?
Where did they say it is not ok? Genuine question, I have never seen any statement about such doctrine being in place. I guess if you have been flying thousands of single engine fighters for decades, it is a bit peculiar all of a sudden to realize that was not acceptable...I must have missed where VKS decided it is ok with single engine planes again?
Those were also the oldest ones in a country that had to cut their armed forces to a fraction of their size, so this is hardly a proof the single engine topic was the key and not the age of the planes. And if it was the engine, it is not hard to understand that not being able to maintain the fleet may play a big role in that decision.When they retired every single engine type rather promptly post USSR collapse.
Basically all of them were old as sh!t though. Su-17M4's, what for with Su-24M's around and replacement for Su-24M already in development at that time. (several, actually) MiG-23's? Why with MiG-29's around? MiG-27's? Same but with Su-25. Etc. Army had to shrink so they threw out the most obvious ones.Where did they say it is not ok? Genuine question, I have never seen any statement about such doctrine being in place. I guess if you have been flying thousands of single engine fighters for decades, it is a bit peculiar all of a sudden to realize that was not acceptable...I must have missed where VKS decided it is ok with single engine planes again?
When they retired every single engine type rather promptly post USSR collapse.
The hypersonic part is kinda make it doubtful
The hypersonic part is kinda make it doubtful
Here a bit more realistic...
But now built by Silhouette?? I thought it is a MiG project? ... and any idea how it will be presented at MAKS?
I personally think that MiG will push its design as a future deck fighter.