Current Nuclear Weapons Development

bobbymike said:

Momentum Grows For Expanded U.S. Nuclear Weapons Arsenal | Aviation Week Network

The outgoing Biden administration is laying the groundwork for the larger U.S. strategic force championed during the first Trump administration.
aviationweek.com aviationweek.com
Click to expand...

Given Trump's life long fascination with nuclear-weapons (Remember that when he was growing up for the first 16 years of his life there were regular atmospheric nuclear-tests) I can easily see a strong push for an expanded US nuclear-arsenal coming from the WH.
 
Last edited:
Defense Updates has put out this video concerning the latest test-launch of India's K-4 SLBM with it this time fired from the INS Arigaat:


India marked a major milestone in its strategic capabilities with the first test of the K-4 submarine-launched ballistic missile (SLBM) from an operational SSBN on November 27. Viewers may note that prior to this, the missile had undergone at least two tests, both conducted using an underwater pontoon.
Click to expand...
The nuclear-capable missile, boasting a range of 3,500 km or around 2,175 miles, was launched from INS Arighaat Ballistic Missile Submarine, which entered service earlier this year.
Click to expand...
This advancement significantly enhances India’s nuclear triad, bolstering its second-strike capability to deter adversaries while overcoming operational challenges.
Click to expand...
In this video, Defense Updates analyzes why K-4 SLBM is a game changer for India ?
Click to expand...
#defenseupdates #K4SLBM #insarighaat
Click to expand...
Chapters:
00:11 INTRODUCTION
01:51 K-4 MISSILE
03:43 KEY ELEMENT OF INDIA’s NUCLEAR TRIAD
05:59 ANALYSIS
Click to expand...
 
Forest Green said:
breakingdefense.com

West drawing near to 'third nuclear age,' says head of UK armed forces - Breaking Defense

UK Chief of the Defence Staff Adm. Tony Radakin, also said there is only a “remote” chance that Russia attacks the UK — a projection that is also true for NATO as a whole — while Moscow understands that a retaliatory response would be overwhelming, “whether conventional or nuclear.”
breakingdefense.com breakingdefense.com
Click to expand...
Yes, with every nation that can even remotely afford nukes going to acquire them. After Russia invaded Ukraine and suffered no major consequences despite the 1994 treaty where Ukraine gave up all the Soviet-era nukes on Ukrainian territory in exchange for territorial guarantees, any remotely sane nation would see that possessing nukes is the only way to avoid someone invading you.
 
By 2030 or by 2020?
www.spacewar.com

Defense Department report: China to have 1K nuclear weapons in arsenal by 2030

Washington DC (UPI) Dec 18, 2024 - The Chinese Communist Party intends to add more nuclear arms to its growing arsenal while expanding its global influence and sovereignty, a Department of Defense report says.
www.spacewar.com

www.airandspaceforces.com

Watchdog: Issues with Program Management of Nuclear Warheads

The National Nuclear Security Administration needs more consistency in how it manages warhead programs, the GAO said.
www.airandspaceforces.com www.airandspaceforces.com
 
Last edited:
Josh_TN said:
It actually is easier to stabilize the VLF antenna from a slower prop driven aircraft, from what I’ve read. There would be a lot of parts available and a rough strip capability as well.
Click to expand...
I've also read that.

Apparently the VLF antenna needs to hang as close to vertical as possible, which is easiest with a slow aircraft.
 
NMaude said:
Wouldn't the EC-130J be a retrograde step? It's not as capable aircraft as the E-6.
Click to expand...

Yes, in a sense. The E-130J (that's official, not EC-130J) loses the other function of the E-6B as a Looking Glass airborne launch control aircraft for the Air Force ICBMs. The Air Force will have to cover that function with their new E-4C SAOC aircraft.
 
breakingdefense.com

US completes $9B B61-12 nuclear warhead upgrade - Breaking Defense

Technically, the B61-12 is not a “new” nuclear weapon that increases the stockpile, as the US is taking the warheads from the older bombs and placing them in new housings.
breakingdefense.com breakingdefense.com

Notably, the agency announcement says that with “production of the B61-12 LEP now complete, NNSA will transition to producing the B61-13 bomb.” The B61-13, announced in October 2023, is designed to have a higher-yield in the range of a 360 kiloton blast, which would represent a major step up from the 50 kiloton B61-12.
Click to expand...
 
I wonder how much of the conversion work creating the B61-12 involved rebuilding its' physics package?
 
NMaude said:
I wonder how much of the conversion work creating the B61-12 involved rebuilding its' physics package?
Click to expand...
Given the cost of the materials in the physics package, probably quite a bit. Tritium is only marginally less expensive than diamond per gram and the fission fuel, while an order of magnitude less, is still more expensive than gold by two orders of magnitude.
brightside.me

The 12 Most Expensive Materials In The World

For many centuries, lots of people have believed that gold is one of the most expensive materials in the world. This, however, is absolutely wrong.
brightside.me brightside.me
 
Forest Green said:
Given the cost of the materials in the physics package, probably quite a bit. Tritium is only marginally less expensive than diamond per gram and the fission fuel, while an order of magnitude less, is still more expensive than gold by two orders of magnitude.
brightside.me

The 12 Most Expensive Materials In The World

For many centuries, lots of people have believed that gold is one of the most expensive materials in the world. This, however, is absolutely wrong.
brightside.me brightside.me
Click to expand...
My understanding of the B61-12 was that they were taking old physics packages and installing them into new airframes/shapes that had attachment points for the JDAM tail kit (or an equivalent to the JDAM tailkit built in, the descriptions are not clear on that point).

This doesn't mean that the old physics packages didn't need any refurbishment, however.
 
Scott Kenny said:
My understanding of the B61-12 was that they were taking old physics packages and installing them into new airframes/shapes that had attachment points for the JDAM tail kit (or an equivalent to the JDAM tailkit built in, the descriptions are not clear on that point).

This doesn't mean that the old physics packages didn't need any refurbishment, however.
Click to expand...
The issue is upgrading from 50kt (in the -12) to 360kt in the -13.
 
Forest Green said:
The issue is upgrading from 50kt (in the -12) to 360kt in the -13.
Click to expand...

That is the difference between using a mod 4 tactical warhead vs a mod 7 strategic warhead as your starting point. Both will be heavily refurbished as part of the process, but the yields are related to the parent physics package.
 
Forest Green said:
...which depends on very expensive materials.
Click to expand...

Haven't they already been paid for? Remember that the 1950s and 1960s there was a massive expansion of the US nuclear-arsenal which has subsequently been shrunk to a small fraction of its original size. The result is that the PANTEX plant at Amarillo, Texas and the Y-12 facility at Oakridge, Tennessee have literally thousands of pits and secondaries in long-term storage, that is a LOT of surplus Oralloy, weapons-grade Pu-239 and Li6D available to be recycled and reused in new nuclear warheads.
 
Forest Green said:
Given the cost of the materials in the physics package, probably quite a bit. Tritium is only marginally less expensive than diamond per gram and the fission fuel, while an order of magnitude less, is still more expensive than gold by two orders of magnitude.
brightside.me

The 12 Most Expensive Materials In The World

For many centuries, lots of people have believed that gold is one of the most expensive materials in the world. This, however, is absolutely wrong.
brightside.me brightside.me
Click to expand...
Oh, right.

Does any modern nuke still use Tritium? I thought they were all 6LiD for the fusion fuel?
 
Scott Kenny said:
Does any modern nuke still use Tritium?
Click to expand...

Yes, it is mixed with Deuterium form the DT-gas mixture used for hollow-boosting the primary and the way modern primaries are designed it is critical as an unbolted primary will only yield 0.3KT before disassembly.

Scott Kenny said:
I thought they were all 6LiD for the fusion fuel?
Click to expand...

The Li6D is used as the fusion fuel in the secondary.
 
Last edited:
Scott Kenny said:
Oh, right.

Does any modern nuke still use Tritium? I thought they were all 6LiD for the fusion fuel?
Click to expand...

Tritium is typically injected into the primary as a booster to increase efficiency of the first stage. I had thought this still common in US warheads, with the teitium bottle having to be refilled periodically.
 
Josh_TN said:
Tritium is typically injected into the primary as a booster to increase efficiency of the first stage.
Click to expand...

It's a mixture of Deuterium and Tritium and with modern primaries it's not about increasing the pit's efficiency but reducing the amount of HE used to compress it making for a smaller and lighter warhead. Without the DT boost the primary only yields 0.3KT which also has effect of making it safer too.

Josh_TN said:
I had thought this still common in US warheads, with the teitium bottle having to be refilled periodically.
Click to expand...

It still is periodically refilled (Tritium has a half-life of 12.32 years).
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom