Pásalo por el traductor o la señorita Rottenmeyer te regañara, esta gente es muy seria.Aún es temprano para el Día de los Inocentes jajaja
Pásalo por el traductor o la señorita Rottenmeyer te regañara, esta gente es muy seria.Aún es temprano para el Día de los Inocentes jajaja
It seem there is a cover on it...I don't see anything non-rationale in design _at first sught_. May be landing gears and their doors look somewhat off-oml, fragile and little bit suspicious.
What we suppose to see here I believe is a scaled prototype of NGB or LRS-B. If this is someone's modelling effort then it's quite plausible again _at first sight_.
Well, I have questions about that hanging control surface and MLG struts. They just don't make sense that's true.
With AI blooming number of those will be raising in exponential scale.
[Awaiting TWZ piece with zillion cross-urls in hours]
corrected... sometimes copy and paste works against you hahahaPásalo por el traductor o la señorita Rottenmeyer te regañara, esta gente es muy seria.
I wish they would.Awaiting TWZ piece with zillion cross-urls in hours
How you explain the cover on the plane if this is a IA picture ? I don't believe in IA picture , it could be some sort of mock up ?It seem there is a cover on it...View attachment 753132
What "cover"??It seem there is a cover on it...View attachment 753132
The image is too grainy to make an assumption about the surface to alleged plane is standing on.-No ramp/runway? Why is the aircraft parked in the dirt?
The OP at DLR (https://dreamlandresort.com/forum/messages/62748.html) seems to say, that he intentionally reduced the photo quality ("... they’ll release some photos, including this one but in higher quality.")-Why the film grain? Assuming an NGB/LRSB demonstrator flew in the 2010s, what kind of camera in the same time period would have so much film grain?
Sorry. I thought you mean original post with unedited pic. Restored your text.My preceding posting was edited to remove the link to the source of the "smoothed" version of the image shown in this posting, together with my criticism about not acknowledging image sources. The explanation I got from the Mod via PM is "There is actually a link in the original post". So it seems I made a stupid mistake, but TBH I still cannot find the link here to the source of the smoothed-out image. Can someone clear up my confusion? Thanks!
The DLR post was linked in my postWhat "cover"??
Also, I consider it bad style to post an image without acknowledging the source. Here it is:
https://dreamlandresort.com/forum/messages/62781.html
Yes, the original "noisy" one. I referred to the "denoised" version (which is a non-trivial manipulation, introducing further artifacts).The DLR post was linked in my post
OMG Bounce has discovered the X-274!
Why would anyone take these sort of images seriously given how easy it is to fake such stuff these days? It's just not worth the mental effort of trying to analyse these images.
Proof?Hey guys I found this image of a Northrop Grumman 69th gen fighter