SSgtC
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 13 July 2020
- Messages
- 1,215
- Reaction score
- 2,798
Even more than usual in this casePure Cold War idiocy, really.
Even more than usual in this casePure Cold War idiocy, really.
So this TL might become a hotter Cold War than OTL.in this case
So this TL might become a hotter Cold War than OTL.
Basically yes. Though much of what the CIA is doing is from OTL, I've started to sour relations between the West and Indonesia earlier so that Sukarno is less willing to overlook things. So it will force the Cold War to go hotter and in turn force Congress and the Navy to mandate a larger carrier force. There are a few other things that need happen as well though to keep the Essex in service past the late 70s. Part of that has already happened with the loss of Independence. There will be more to come in the other changes as well.That's the point indeed, it is needed for the USN to keep more Essex in service after 1975 (AFAIK).
Jumping the gun here but that would mean another upgrade after SCB-125AThat's the point indeed, it is needed for the USN to keep more Essex in service after 1975 (AFAIK).
The C13 cat is probably not possible. If you look at the overhead of Oriskany, the starboard JBD is almost up against the island. Even using the shortest version of the C13 as fitted to Charles De Gualle, I don't know if you can squeeze in an additional 36 feet forward of the island without stretching the hull. And while that's doable, I'm not so sure doing it would be any cheaper than building a new conventionally powered carrier.So tentatively an SCB-125B comes with a steel deck, C-13-X catapult, boiler refresh, automatization, and general habitation improvements all wrapped up with a CV designation? I think that was the conclusion on the Alt-history forum awhile back.
I once read on another forum that Lexington was supposed to receive a steel deck sometime in the 80's to operate Hornets, take it with a grain of salt.
I doubt it. Unless the C13 is lighter than the C11-1. Then there could possibly be a benefit as it reduces top weight and frees up more weight for other improvements.Would there be any benefit of chopping a C-13 down to 225ft in terms of reliability, service life, or cost reduction during a big refit?
No, CVA-62 was assigned to Independence. It won't change. CVA-63&64 are still the two Kitty Hawk class. CVA(N)-65&66 will be the two Enterprise class.Hmmm, a Enterprise twin ? nice to have. Although the 8*reactors scheme was heavy and complex, with perfect hindsight we know it worked well enough that Enterprise lasted until 2013.
Having a twin will certainly help CVN-65, at least it won't be a huge "one-off" (must have cost the OTL USN an arm and a leg, or maybe not since it wasn't retired at the end of Cold War).
Down the line this will probably impact the "in between" Kennedy and America.
So CV-66 will be CVN-66 ?
Also, with Independance a floating bonfire, will its "CV-62" number be given to Kitty Hawk ?
Alternate numbering
CV-61 Ranger
CV-62 Kitty Hawk
CV-63 Constellation
CVN-64 Enterprise
CVN-65 "Enterprise-twin" or "America" (would make sense).
Could one develop the requisite velocity in a shorter length with an internal combustion catapult? It was under consideration for Enterprise, so the timing could work.I doubt it. Unless the C13 is lighter than the C11-1. Then there could possibly be a benefit as it reduces top weight and frees up more weight for other improvements.Would there be any benefit of chopping a C-13 down to 225ft in terms of reliability, service life, or cost reduction during a big refit?
Theoretically, sure. The C14 would have been an ideal fit for the Essex class. It was lighter, it was stronger and it didn't require steam, which meant the ship could give you a continuous 31 knots of wind over the deck while conducting high tempo flight operations. That's something that not even a Nimitz can do. And the final benefit? It was backfitable to any existing steam catapult system.Could one develop the requisite velocity in a shorter length with an internal combustion catapult? It was under consideration for Enterprise, so the timing could work.I doubt it. Unless the C13 is lighter than the C11-1. Then there could possibly be a benefit as it reduces top weight and frees up more weight for other improvements.Would there be any benefit of chopping a C-13 down to 225ft in terms of reliability, service life, or cost reduction during a big refit?
an internal combustion catapult?
There's an article about it on the global security website. Apparently it got pretty advanced. To the point that the system was formally designated C14 and Enterprise was actually fitted with some of the hardware needed to operate it before it was determined to be unsuitable for carrier operations and the C13 catapult was installed instead.an internal combustion catapult?
Never heard about that. How does that work ?
would the second Enterprise-class not be CVN-66 as Enterprise was CVN-65 ore am I wrong.Hmmm, a Enterprise twin ? nice to have. Although the 8*reactors scheme was heavy and complex, with perfect hindsight we know it worked well enough that Enterprise lasted until 2013.
Having a twin will certainly help CVN-65, at least it won't be a huge "one-off" (must have cost the OTL USN an arm and a leg, or maybe not since it wasn't retired at the end of Cold War).
Down the line this will probably impact the "in between" Kennedy and America.
So CV-66 will be CVN-66 ?
Also, with Independance a floating bonfire, will its "CV-62" number be given to Kitty Hawk ?
Alternate numbering
CV-61 Ranger
CV-62 Kitty Hawk
CV-63 Constellation
CVN-64 Enterprise
CVN-65 "Enterprise-twin" or "America" (would make sense).
It would be. CVA-62 was ordered as a Forestallclass carrier and is in the process of being scraped. So that number is unavailable. The next carrier after Enterprise will be CVA(N)-66.would the second Enterprise-class not be CVN-66 as Enterprise was CVN-65 ore am I wrong.Hmmm, a Enterprise twin ? nice to have. Although the 8*reactors scheme was heavy and complex, with perfect hindsight we know it worked well enough that Enterprise lasted until 2013.
Having a twin will certainly help CVN-65, at least it won't be a huge "one-off" (must have cost the OTL USN an arm and a leg, or maybe not since it wasn't retired at the end of Cold War).
Down the line this will probably impact the "in between" Kennedy and America.
So CV-66 will be CVN-66 ?
Also, with Independance a floating bonfire, will its "CV-62" number be given to Kitty Hawk ?
Alternate numbering
CV-61 Ranger
CV-62 Kitty Hawk
CV-63 Constellation
CVN-64 Enterprise
CVN-65 "Enterprise-twin" or "America" (would make sense).
If purchased, the MiG-19 would become the first supersonic fighter in service with any country in the Southwest Pacific.
Maybe? It didn't in OTL when Indonesia was flying MiG-21s by 1962 (Australia didn't induct the Mirage III until 1965). They may start inquiring about new fighters earlier in TTL just because Indonesia is getting them slightly earlier. Also in OTL, Indonesia bought the MiG-19S, a gun armed variant. Here, they're being offered the -19PM, a missile armed version. Not sure how that will effect the RAAF.If purchased, the MiG-19 would become the first supersonic fighter in service with any country in the Southwest Pacific.
Hmmm...would such a development drive Australia to accelerate plans to replace the CAC Sabre?
Probably not much at all as the RAAF seemed to suffer the same cultural cringe as the government of the day, i.e. Australia was a predominantly agrarian society (wrong we had always been more urban than country) and was incapable of effectively operating advanced combat aircraft. It wasn't until it became an election issue that the government committed to replacing the Canberra, irrespective of what was happening in the region.Maybe? It didn't in OTL when Indonesia was flying MiG-21s by 1962 (Australia didn't induct the Mirage III until 1965). They may start inquiring about new fighters earlier in TTL just because Indonesia is getting them slightly earlier. Also in OTL, Indonesia bought the MiG-19S, a gun armed variant. Here, they're being offered the -19PM, a missile armed version. Not sure how that will effect the RAAF.If purchased, the MiG-19 would become the first supersonic fighter in service with any country in the Southwest Pacific.
Hmmm...would such a development drive Australia to accelerate plans to replace the CAC Sabre?
All I'll say, is that events in the TL will be snapping Australia out of that mindset much more rapidly than in OTL. For one, Indonesia and the Netherlands are much more antagonistic towards each other than they were at this point in OTL.Probably not much at all as the RAAF seemed to suffer the same cultural cringe as the government of the day, i.e. Australia was a predominantly agrarian society (wrong we had always been more urban than country) and was incapable of effectively operating advanced combat aircraft. It wasn't until it became an election issue that the government committed to replacing the Canberra, irrespective of what was happening in the region.
Once they finally woke up to the fact Indonesia and the Netherlands were potentially about to have a war on our doorstep the answer was conscription to increase the number of infantry and finally investigate obtaining a GPMG and an APC, cancel the conversion of Melbourne into an ASW Helo carrier and investigate modernising its airgroup. Once Suharto took over removing the northern communist threat, the conscripted infantry were committed to Vietnam in an attempt to bribe the US into being our security blanket, even though Indonesia was strategically much more important to them. The RAAF remained very much an ineffective, late 40s / early 50s force until the Mirage arrived in significant numbers in the late 60s.
There has always been a cultural cringe in Australia, i.e. we are too small, poor, whatever to go it alone so therefore need a protector. From this the concept of providing component capabilities to an allies efforts is derived, i.e. infantry and mounted infantry in WWI and naval forces totally integrated with the Rn then USN in WWI then WWII. The myth of the citizen soldier didn't help either, i.e. Australians are natural soldiers meaning an army can be created from scratch, when and as required.All I'll say, is that events in the TL will be snapping Australia out of that mindset much more rapidly than in OTL. For one, Indonesia and the Netherlands are much more antagonistic towards each other than they were at this point in OTL.Probably not much at all as the RAAF seemed to suffer the same cultural cringe as the government of the day, i.e. Australia was a predominantly agrarian society (wrong we had always been more urban than country) and was incapable of effectively operating advanced combat aircraft. It wasn't until it became an election issue that the government committed to replacing the Canberra, irrespective of what was happening in the region.
Once they finally woke up to the fact Indonesia and the Netherlands were potentially about to have a war on our doorstep the answer was conscription to increase the number of infantry and finally investigate obtaining a GPMG and an APC, cancel the conversion of Melbourne into an ASW Helo carrier and investigate modernising its airgroup. Once Suharto took over removing the northern communist threat, the conscripted infantry were committed to Vietnam in an attempt to bribe the US into being our security blanket, even though Indonesia was strategically much more important to them. The RAAF remained very much an ineffective, late 40s / early 50s force until the Mirage arrived in significant numbers in the late 60s.
Though I do find it odd that Australia took such a relaxed approach to modernising their military post WWII. I mean, Indonesia was flying MiG-21s while the RAAF was still flying Sabres.
As the Dutch have no carrier in the region, the most likely target would be the US carriers.Bulganin... sounds like a medecine lol. "I took bulganin for three weeks and it cured all my ailments !" ROTFL
More seriously: here come the Tu-16s. Outch: this gonna hurt later on.
Indonesia is determined to make themselves strong enough that they can't be ordered around. It's backfired a little bit, since Sukarno has been forced to cozy up to the Soviets instead of charting a truly neutral course, but he has more pressing concerns at the moment.Bulganin... sounds like a medecine lol. "I took bulganin for three weeks and it cured all my ailments !" ROTFL
More seriously: here come the Tu-16s. Outch: this gonna hurt later on.