Cheranovsky (Cheranovskii) Aircraft and Designs

Vladimir said:

Thanks Vladimir. As a rule I do not share Motocar's modified plans because, as he himself indicates, they are "free interpretations" of existing material, therefore speculative and not fit for this section, in my opinion. That's why he has a dedicated topic for his work in the "User artwork" section.
 
Soon he begins to model the Cheranowski Bich-17, although there is one in the market, this will be in different materials
 
From Авиация и космонавтика 5/2016 & 4/2016,

here is a drawings and pictures to BICh aircraft,also a small info about BICh-15
and BICh-19.
 

Attachments

  • 5.png
    5.png
    230.3 KB · Views: 288
  • 19.png
    19.png
    219.6 KB · Views: 169
  • 16.png
    16.png
    279.9 KB · Views: 151
  • 15.png
    15.png
    59.7 KB · Views: 143
  • 14.png
    14.png
    287.9 KB · Views: 171
  • 10.png
    10.png
    455 KB · Views: 155
  • 9.png
    9.png
    360.7 KB · Views: 169
Also amazing sketches for him with a Model.
 

Attachments

  • 1-8.png
    1-8.png
    286.5 KB · Views: 135
  • 1-7.png
    1-7.png
    466.6 KB · Views: 131
  • 1-6.png
    1-6.png
    221.3 KB · Views: 131
  • 1-5.png
    1-5.png
    166.1 KB · Views: 139
  • 1-4.png
    1-4.png
    233.3 KB · Views: 143
  • 1-3.png
    1-3.png
    293.7 KB · Views: 136
  • 1-2.png
    1-2.png
    226.4 KB · Views: 142
  • 1-1.png
    1-1.png
    240.7 KB · Views: 151
The first drawing in the first of Hesham's recent posts is of the passenger variant of the BICh-5. Never seen this image before, thanks for posting!

In 1925 Cheranovsky proposed several flying wing aircraft designs. Some of these were tested in the TsAGI wind tunnel during 1927-1928. One of these was a large, aerodynamically clean aircraft with a BMW VI engine designated the BICh-5. It was intended as a bomber with retractable undercarriage but was never completed.

I have literally just received my copy of the April A+K so I am looking forward to reading it.

Source for notes:

The History of the Construction of Aircraft in the USSR to 1938 by V.B.Shavrov
Bulletin of the Russian Aviation Research Group
 
Can you translate please the text under the picture 1-6, they speak about BITSch No.3 and 4...
 
Thank you my dear Cy-27,

and for BICh-5 V,its new for me too.
 
Last edited:
Can you translate please the text under the picture 1-6

"Monoplane which was first signed [designated] as the BICh No 3 and BICh No 4".

Probably not the same as the parabolic wing BICh-3 and BICh-4 designs (different engine and tail).
 
From Авиация и Космонавтика 2016-06,

here is a two Projects for Cheranovskii,one from 1941,maybe a glider,and the second
was from 1942 ?.
 

Attachments

  • 3.png
    3.png
    474.5 KB · Views: 184
  • 2.png
    2.png
    622.4 KB · Views: 185
  • 1.png
    1.png
    172.9 KB · Views: 171
Seems that both are gliders, one is ornithopter glider and the second one is flying wing intended for airborne operations.
 
Hi,

a strange design to Cheranovsky,with twin tail fin,mounted at the middle of the wings ?.

http://www.avia-it.com/act/biblioteca/periodici/PDF%20Riviste/Ala%20d'Italia/L'ALA%20D'ITALIA%201928%2004.pdf
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    513.4 KB · Views: 468
The accompanying article to the Hesham's drawing from L'Ala d'Italia states:

This design is due to Mr. B.I. Cheranovski.

The model of that device was from the experimental aerodynamic central institute in Moscow [TsAGI]; it has the original provision that appears in the picture.

The very wide wing surface has the special shape seems that the conditions of static and dynamic stability are favourable, even in respect to the moments around the three axes, the vertical axis, longitudinal and transverse. The experimental [parabola wing] system was already use in the development of glider aircraft models.

The parabolic wing was equipped with two engines (75 hp each) with symmetrical propellers. The wing was extended 12 metres, its maximum depth of 4.5 metres; wing area 25 sq m. Total weight including the engines was 1,200 kg with a maximum speed of 120 km/h.

No designation was noted in the article. I thought at first it might be a preliminary design for the BICh-10 but the 1933 date did not fit in with the magazines 1928 date. It could be an initial design that eventually led to the BICh-5 design, but I think its possibly an evaluation design for models to be tested in the TsAGI wind tunnel.
 
Sorry my dear Cy-27,

I didn't see your respond,just seen,and here is a drawings to Cheranovsky RP-1 & RP-2
Rocketplanes.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    223.7 KB · Views: 320
hesham said:
From Авиация и Космонавтика 2016-06,

The Che-23.
 

Attachments

  • a.png
    a.png
    189.5 KB · Views: 249
  • b.png
    b.png
    653.1 KB · Views: 235
From Aviation magazine 1956,

all Info about BICh-15 ;

The next aircraft was again a glider, the BICh-15 from 1934, a single-seater without tail trapezoidal wing (trailing edge right, leading edge in arrow), at monotrace train and daggerboards of wings. Very little is known about this experimental prototype the following figures:
Characteristics: span:
14.25 m. (46 ft 9 in): empty weight:
100 kg. (221 1b.).
 

Attachments

  • BICh-15.png
    BICh-15.png
    174.2 KB · Views: 124
Last edited:
hesham said:
Thank you dear borovik,

About the BICh aircraft and do you know the BICh-22 ?
I think it was a light aircraft.
BICh-22 or the more known as Che-22. 1948. Developments OKB-MAI
Span:7,5 m
Lenght: 4,2 m
From Flying 1950-6,

a clearer view to it.

 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    177.4 KB · Views: 144
In the book (The Osprey Encyclopedia of Russian Aircraft),I found under the title L.B. Kurchyevskii on pages 160 and 161 that :

he was the designer of APK series of large-calibre cannon and he
worked in USP for NKTP and he invited the aircraft constructors
to make a fighters to armed them with these guns , such as IL
and CHERANOVSKII BICh-17 fighters,after he was arrested there
were other two projects one from BICh design and the anther
from P.D.Gurshin at MAI.

From the source,still Mystery ?.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    197.1 KB · Views: 105
From this book,

That's what I imagined
Cheranovsky in 1940
plane of the future
 

Attachments

  • 20.png
    20.png
    97.9 KB · Views: 59
  • 0.png
    0.png
    771 KB · Views: 91
A new one for me... a tank-carrier called the BiCH-004 by Fairchild's inhouse magazine back in 1951.
Was that a genuine Cheranovsky project? (or even a genuine Soviet project for that matter?)
 

Attachments

  • 1708558528401.png
    1708558528401.png
    346.8 KB · Views: 80
  • 1708558573274.png
    1708558573274.png
    627.8 KB · Views: 88
A new one for me... a tank-carrier called the BiCH-004 by Fairchild's inhouse magazine back in 1951.
Was that a genuine Cheranovsky project? (or even a genuine Soviet project for that matter?)
This one is a fake, it's in the "Western Artists' Concepts of Soviet aircraft during the Cold War" thread.
 
From, Lotnictwo_2013-04
 

Attachments

  • 7.png
    7.png
    1.2 MB · Views: 51
  • 8.png
    8.png
    1 MB · Views: 49
  • 9.png
    9.png
    1.1 MB · Views: 47
  • 10.png
    10.png
    940.2 KB · Views: 45
  • 11.png
    11.png
    535.2 KB · Views: 52
In the interwar period independent Russian designers proved to be remarkably busy researching flying wings. Between 1924 and 1937 Boris Tcheranovski, I. Kostschenko, A. Putilov, Alexandra Lazaref, A. Krol, Serguei Kirov, Pavel Grokhovski, Alexandre Moskalyev, Constantin Kalinine, V. Beliaev and Vladimir Tchizevski designed and built 32 flying wings and tailless airplanes.

This activity was tolerated and even encouraged by the Soviets through the Ossoaviakhim (Society for the promotion of aviation) as the exhibition of unusual prototypes would support its propaganda services.

But in 1938, the defeat of the Polikarpov fighters in Spain revealed the Soviet technological inferiority. Constantin Kalinine was purged, its design team disbanded, and the unorthodox designs officially disapproved.

In 1948 Boris Tcheranovski could build the BITch-22 prototype, a tailless glider with 7.5 m wingspan, to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Konsomol. The plane only flew twice in September 1948 and July 1949 at Tushino.

On June 4, 1948, the leadership of the Soviet aviation industry decided to stop the development of the Chetverikov LK-1, a 950 kph flying wing bomber with 3,000 km range powered by two Rolls-Royce Nene turbojets. By the end of 1948, the OKB-458 design bureau was disbanded and Igor Chetverikov accepted a teaching post in Leningrad.

In July 1948, the Antonov Project M, a flying wing jet fighter (Fake Yak-21) inspired in the German Arado Ar. I was also unexpectedly cancelled.

Between 1949 and 1952 the Tcheranovski design bureau produced four projects of tailless jet fighters (Nº 24, 25, 26 and 110) without any official support.

All subsequent Soviet developments of strategic bombers were of conventional design and when the Cold War was over, Northrop started to manufacture flying wing bombers anew.

In 1984 was designed the Myasishchev M-67 LK, a Soviet version of the Northrop B-2A flying wing bomber, but their development ended with the economic collapse of the Soviet Union.
 
In 1948 Boris Tcheranovski could build the BITch-22 prototype, a tailless glider with 7.5 m wingspan, to commemorate the 30th anniversary of the founding of the Konsomol. The plane only flew twice in September 1948 and July 1949 at Tushino.
(...)
In 1984 was designed the Myasishchev M-67 LK, a Soviet version of the Northrop B-2A flying wing bomber, but their development ended with the economic collapse of the Soviet Union.
Very interesting, but "Postwar" !!!
 
@Justo Miranda This is a thread in Secret Early Aircraft Projects.
I admit Cheranovskii's career stretches into post WW2.
 
Last edited:
A new one for me... a tank-carrier called the BiCH-004 by Fairchild's inhouse magazine back in 1951.
Was that a genuine Cheranovsky project? (or even a genuine Soviet project for that matter?)
It reminds me of this very Gaulois project from Renault for an AMR-35 light tank ... Subject that had to be discussed here once if I am not mistaken. This said, the Cheranovsky seems to be the most ambitious of all these aircraft or tank-planes because they were only intended for light tanks, since the T-34 if it is categorized as a medium tank, it weighs 28 to 32 metric tons ...

 
Motocar's Cutaway drawings speculative image of BICh-21
Cutaway Cheranowsky BICh 21.
The small racing aircraft designed by Cheranowsky, using his specialty "Flying Wing" but changing its characteristic parabolic leading edge wing for a simpler one with the center section with straight leading edge in a slight inverted gull wing (seen on the failed BIHc-17 fighter) and outer sections in trapezoidal plan, equipped with an MB-6A inverted cylinder engine, a Renault produced under license, this produced only 220 hp instead of the 240 hp of those officially offered, however managed to reach a speed of 417 km / h only 7 km below the performance offered in the original design, it was a small aircraft of only 6.5 meters of wingspan and a length of 4.70 meters and a weight of 417 kgs loaded, its fuselage of tubular construction and wings with wooden spars covered with plywood and fabric, retractable classic landing gear, speculative drawing to recreate this unique and original aircraft, Motocar

 

Attachments

  • Cutaway BICh-21 en progreso.jpg
    Cutaway BICh-21 en progreso.jpg
    580.4 KB · Views: 32
On June 4, 1948, the leadership of the Soviet aviation industry decided to stop the development of the Chetverikov LK-1, a 950 kph flying wing bomber with 3,000 km range powered by two Rolls-Royce Nene turbojets.
Dear Justo,
Do you have more detail on this LK-1 project?
Is it linked with the TLK model here-under?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards
 

Attachments

  • Cheranovski TLK.jpg
    Cheranovski TLK.jpg
    170.6 KB · Views: 50
Dear Justo,
Do you have more detail on this LK-1 project?
Is it linked with the TLK model here-under?
Thanks in advance!
Best regards
I'm sorry I can't help you with this, the information I used to write this part of my book comes from some photocopies that Antonio sent me, but I don't remember the title of the original book.

Maybe Antonio can help.
 
It reminds me of this very Gaulois project from Renault for an AMR-35 light tank ... Subject that had to be discussed here once if I am not mistaken. This said, the Cheranovsky seems to be the most ambitious of all these aircraft or tank-planes because they were only intended for light tanks, since the T-34 if it is categorized as a medium tank, it weighs 28 to 32 metric tons ...

This project?
 

Attachments

  • img206.jpg
    img206.jpg
    569.5 KB · Views: 45
Aside from the well-documented BICh- series, there is a handful of undesignated designs also related to Cheranovsky. Here are the ones that I know of (if any of these is not Cheranovsky's and I've made a mistake, please let me know!):
Fake Delta Night Fighter​

On April 16, 1947, the NCAP ordered to the OKB-153 (Antonov) the design of a flying wing fighter powered by two RD-10 turbojets under the codename “Project M”.

The RD-10 only had 900 kg static thrust and the designers understood that with that power it would be difficult to compete with the latest Western designs Northrop XP-79B and de Havilland DH-108.

To achieve high speeds, it was necessary to use a delta wing with 55-degree swept (at leading edge).

This aerodynamic solution was considered something very extreme at that time and it was feared that the aircraft had a dangerous behavior during landing, to improve its stability at low speeds it was decided to install two wingtip extensions with 17-degree forward swept.

When the first Soviet copies of the British centrifugal turbojet Nene became available, in late 1947, Antonov was instructed to modify the "Project M" replacing the two RD-10 turbojets with an indigenous RD-45, with 2,230 kg thrust. This allowed to reduce the wing swept up to 53-degree and eliminate the wing tips.

The final design of 1948, named Masha, had triangular air intakes mounted in the wing roots and semicircular tailfins very similar to those of the night fighter project proposed by Siegfried Günter that same year.

To test the concept, the glider E-153 was built, which made its first flight in July 1948, but the Masha was unexpectedly cancelled due to the urgent need of Nene engines for the manufacture of the MiG-15 fighters.

Antonov Project M (1947) technical data

Wingspan: 35.4 ft. (10.8 m), length: 34.8 ft. (10.6 m), height: 10.9 ft. (3.3 m), power plant: two RD-10 axial-flow turbojets rated at 900 kg static thrust each, proposed armament: 2x23 mm and 2x37 mm cannon.

Antonov Project M (1948) technical data

Wingspan: 30.5 ft. (9.3 m), length: 35 ft. (10.64 m), height: 12.3 ft. (3.75 m), power plant: one RD-45 centrifugal-flow turbojet rated at 2,230 kg static thrust, estimated climb rate: 3,280 ft/min, estimated ceiling: 32,810 ft. (10,000 m), estimated range: 385 miles (620 km), proposed armament: 2x23 mm and 2x37 mm cannon.

The possibility that the Soviets had developed a supersonic fighter in 1949 was of great concern to the Western intelligence services, which ignored the anti-flying wings policy developed by the Soviet government since 1938.

The “Project M” was highly classified, but some information is filtered to the Western press.

In February 1954 the Flying magazine published the cutaway of a Russian all-weather delta fighter similar to the German project Arado E 583 (January 27, 1945) but fitted with triangular air intakes at the wing roots. A structural solution that had already been used a year earlier by the British in the Avro 707A prototype.

On June 6, 1955, LIFE published a drawing based on the Flying cutaway with the text: “Flying Wing Night Fighter has been seen on the ground and zooming over Moscow. Twin jet engines fed by curved air intakes drive tailless plane at close to the speed of sound and permit rapid climbing for interception of bombers. Unlike planes with standard tail and wings, horizontal control surfaces are in trailing edge of flying wing. Vertical stabilizers are mounted near wing tips. Design has been credited to Cheranovski, one Russia’s best aviation engineers”.

Other similar illustrations were published in Popular Mechanics (July 1955) with the text: “MiG-18, a Soviet twin-engine supersonic interceptor, armed with three 20 mm guns, developed as a basis of captured German technology” and Ali Nuove (February 1956).

In 1998 Schiffer published the book "Secret Aircraft Designs of the Third Reich", according to author David Myhra the cutaway published in Flying, was a night fighter project designed by Dr. Ing. Siegfried Günter in 1948. It was probably a perfected version of the Heinkel P-1079B project also designed by Günter in 1945.
 

Attachments

  • a.jpg
    a.jpg
    357 KB · Views: 40
  • b.jpg
    b.jpg
    339.3 KB · Views: 30
  • c.jpg
    c.jpg
    377.1 KB · Views: 28
Aside from the well-documented BICh- series, there is a handful of undesignated designs also related to Cheranovsky. Here are the ones that I know of (if any of these is not Cheranovsky's and I've made a mistake, please let me know!):
- Fake Tcheranovsky BICh-19​



By the mid 30’s, the German chemical companies Rohm und Haas AG and Dynamit Nobel AG-Troisdorf were interested in perfecting the plastic sheeting for aircraft use, with the cooperation of the Horten Brothers who, at that time, dedicated themselves to the construction of flying wing sailplanes.


Early in 1937 the Hortens’ started the construction of the Parabel flying wing, a high-altitude research sailplane with 12 m span parabolic sweptback wing and semi-prone pilot. Theoretically, the continuous curve of a parabola might resolve some of the classic aerodynamic problems of swept wings configuration with the minimum induced drag.

The entire wing structure was made of Dynal Z5 composite, the new material consisting of two layers of cardboard reinforced by phenolic resin with a Tronal (phenol resin-impregnated corrugated cardboard) core. Wing coating was made of Polystal K-10 smooth skin of pressed alternate sheets of Dynal and Tronal that reduced considerably the drag.

The prototype was damaged in transit for flight testing in 1938 and burned unflown early 1939, because it was too costly to repair.

Due to its strange shape the Parabel concept has been used by numerous illustrators to present various types of flying saucers, the most famous being the one sighted by Kenneth Arnold on June 24, 1947.

On October 27, 2015, the website https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/cheranovsky-cheranovskii-aircraft-and-designs.467/page-2 published a fake design taken from the web https://www.deviantart.com/russc1 that represented an imaginary soviet version of the Parabel named Tcheranovsky BICh-19.
 

Attachments

  • e.jpg
    e.jpg
    369.3 KB · Views: 25
  • f.jpg
    f.jpg
    351.7 KB · Views: 26

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom