the one item I'm after is a good 3-view. Does the brochure contain that?
 
What was the point of the small fin on the nose?
To steer it.
It was thought, at the time, that weight savings could be had by having a forward vertical stabilizer, rather an aft-mounted one.
However, shock-on-shock interactions made it less viable (modelling suggested it would burn off)
Which was a problem.
<I used to work on Interim-HOTOL>
 
Last edited:
Images of HOTOL and the Antonov An-225 with HOTOL.
That third picture and the fifth is the Interim Hotol with the Antonov 225 first stage. I remember the day that a large wooden crate arrived at the Atrium of BAe Stevenage - we levered it open and were greeted by half a dozen of those models ensconced in shredded packing paper. I've still got mine and will post some details tonight.
<fifth pic by Mark Hempsall who worked in Future Projects>

Those models are pretty sturdy, and apart from some of the decals peeling, are really well-made. Resin and odd lengths of metal for the struts between the AH-225 and the orbiter. The paint's doing well too. No recollection as to who made 'em and I've seen the odd one on eBay over the years.
 

Attachments

  • DSCN1210.JPG
    DSCN1210.JPG
    506.7 KB · Views: 108
Last edited:
What was the point of the small fin on the nose?
To steer it.
It was thought, at the time, that weight savings could be had by having a forward vertical stabilizer, rather an an aft-mounted one.
<I used to work on Interim-HOTOL>
[/QUOTE]

It was know that with the delta wing there was a significant Cp shift afterwards with increasing Mach number so a bit of leverage was required to counteract it;- hence some feathers upon the nose. However when they did the high speed wind tunnel work it was discovered the original estimates were wrong by, well, a lot. To address this a high lift system was proposed for the wing consisting of both flaps and droops. This put the weight up to such a degree there was no payload, apparently the comment was made that “HOTOL was a means to transport a complex wing high lift system into orbit”.

Ultimately this was the reason for the delta wing/aft engine being dropped and replaced by the Skylon’s short mid wing and tip mounted engines.
 
And for the truly dedicated, some cross-sections of Interim HOTOL (ie, carried aloft by dear old Mria: Antonov's modified AH-225), version 68c.
<yes, for they were legion in their numbering>

The dedicated might want to whizz this up into a modern CAD program.
The less dedicated might still appreciate that this was a 'chonky boi' (as the kids say these days).
 

Attachments

  • HoToL 68c.jpg
    HoToL 68c.jpg
    299.5 KB · Views: 518
Last edited by a moderator:

Attachments

  • s-l1600 (3).jpg
    s-l1600 (3).jpg
    197.6 KB · Views: 65
  • s-l1600 (4).jpg
    s-l1600 (4).jpg
    88.4 KB · Views: 55
  • s-l1600 (5).jpg
    s-l1600 (5).jpg
    114.9 KB · Views: 50
  • s-l1600 (6).jpg
    s-l1600 (6).jpg
    244.2 KB · Views: 123
Earlier contributors to this thread may be interested to know that the final change of geometry, shown in the Flight International magazine with Bob's own painting, was the result of finding an error in the hypersonic drag calculation in the mission optimisation software. I found it when reviewing the software as part of my job as the performance engineer. The tapering shape was important in that calculation; it also shifted the hypersonic centre of lift back. I think I sketched the curve through the segments given by the software.

I have a copy of the painting signed by all the team members as a leaving gift. Somewhere.
 
...
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230819_112703_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230819_112703_ReadEra.jpg
    499.9 KB · Views: 138

Attachments

  • 417892449_10226978301417385_2932923148857879542_n.jpg
    417892449_10226978301417385_2932923148857879542_n.jpg
    756.2 KB · Views: 40
  • 432453341_122098305110250950_659967155191970448_n.jpg
    432453341_122098305110250950_659967155191970448_n.jpg
    229.3 KB · Views: 31
  • 432455853_122098305038250950_4406779967048577950_n.jpg
    432455853_122098305038250950_4406779967048577950_n.jpg
    269.6 KB · Views: 32
  • 430662525_122098305026250950_6477585599082474268_n.jpg
    430662525_122098305026250950_6477585599082474268_n.jpg
    295.6 KB · Views: 32
  • 432462108_122098304942250950_4051798349324208521_n.jpg
    432462108_122098304942250950_4051798349324208521_n.jpg
    263.1 KB · Views: 31
  • 431107445_122098304930250950_4098713903819978091_n.jpg
    431107445_122098304930250950_4098713903819978091_n.jpg
    215.1 KB · Views: 45
Last edited:
I don't know what particular iteration of HOTOL this masterful line drawing (see attached JPEG) shows, from a two-page spread in the 25 March 1989 issue of Flight International. Striking yet informative, it remains the best illustration of the vehicle that I have ever seen: true art. Perhaps a lost art in our computer-generated era. But maybe there will be even better figures inside Dan Sharp's imminently forthcoming book HOTOL: Britain's Spaceplane.
 

Attachments

  • HOTOL cutaway.jpg
    HOTOL cutaway.jpg
    691.3 KB · Views: 39
I don't know what particular iteration of HOTOL this masterful line drawing (see attached JPEG) shows, from a two-page spread in the 25 March 1989 issue of Flight International. Striking yet informative, it remains the best illustration of the vehicle that I have ever seen: true art. Perhaps a lost art in our computer-generated era. But maybe there will be even better figures inside Dan Sharp's imminently forthcoming book HOTOL: Britain's Spaceplane.

I have a gigantic full colour version of that image in my personal collection but sadly it wasn't possible to determine who the copyright holder was (not BAE Systems) and therefore it wasn't ultimately possible to include it in the book. However, I can tell you that it was based on Hotol Configuration J4.5 - see below (extract from Burns' monthly report, dated Feb 28, 1989).

Screenshot 2024-12-21 224518.png
 
I don't know what particular iteration of HOTOL this masterful line drawing (see attached JPEG) shows, from a two-page spread in the 25 March 1989 issue of Flight International. Striking yet informative, it remains the best illustration of the vehicle that I have ever seen: true art. Perhaps a lost art in our computer-generated era. But maybe there will be even better figures inside Dan Sharp's imminently forthcoming book HOTOL: Britain's Spaceplane.

Ok I did a good look at this one and I've got a couple of these on my hard drives but as I was scanning and suddenly came up on #10 and had to take a moment to realize that was NOT the lid of a toilet on-board :)

Randy
 
HOTOL CUTAWAY POSTER SIGNED BY HOTOL TEAM
 
On the face of it, it looks pretty straightforward. Cutaway is by Tim Hall, Technical Artist at Flight International 1977-1999. Copyright ought to reside with the current owners of Flight, DVV Media International Ltd who purchased Reed Business Information Ltd in 2019.

I assume it ISN'T that simple :)
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom