- Joined
- 18 October 2006
- Messages
- 4,094
- Reaction score
- 4,500
Okay there are no doubt "special helicopters" out there for Direct Action missions. I do not think this was one of those occassions warranting their use.
My take is that this misson was execute from long range, out of the way from places in Iraq that no doubt have folks with cell phones waiting to report on when the American airplanes are taking off. MH-60 DAP provided the close in fires that all US SOF like to have on call for these sort of missions because it is air refuelable where as MH-6 are not long range, nor air refuelable. fire Support rotorcraft have rockets, missiles and guns hanging off of them and this sort of defeats the radar stealth signature aspect. To be sure the MH-60 DAP could have variations of rotorblades for better accoustic signature, but I do not think the community would go there if it in anyway compromised the performance of the aircraft. The CV-22 provides twice the speed and range so that if there had been any casualties in the effort they could have recovered them to a medical facility much faster (witness events in Southern Sudan). Also the V-22 is by far the quietest VTOL platform available when it is in airplane mode. I can vouch for this becuse I live in an area where military rotorcraft are plentiful and I have first hand experiance.
Using the "Ubercopter" on a mission that is really less than National survivial and /or prestige just does not make sense to me. I could be wrong, but it does not pass the KISS test to me.
Thats my speculation.
My take is that this misson was execute from long range, out of the way from places in Iraq that no doubt have folks with cell phones waiting to report on when the American airplanes are taking off. MH-60 DAP provided the close in fires that all US SOF like to have on call for these sort of missions because it is air refuelable where as MH-6 are not long range, nor air refuelable. fire Support rotorcraft have rockets, missiles and guns hanging off of them and this sort of defeats the radar stealth signature aspect. To be sure the MH-60 DAP could have variations of rotorblades for better accoustic signature, but I do not think the community would go there if it in anyway compromised the performance of the aircraft. The CV-22 provides twice the speed and range so that if there had been any casualties in the effort they could have recovered them to a medical facility much faster (witness events in Southern Sudan). Also the V-22 is by far the quietest VTOL platform available when it is in airplane mode. I can vouch for this becuse I live in an area where military rotorcraft are plentiful and I have first hand experiance.
Using the "Ubercopter" on a mission that is really less than National survivial and /or prestige just does not make sense to me. I could be wrong, but it does not pass the KISS test to me.
Thats my speculation.