I am quite envious of your talent. Thanks for continuing to share with us.
Thank you very much.Brilliant work Sir! I am always amazed at the talent and sheer volume of work you treat us with.
Unfortunately, there is no exact size data, so there is no point in making a ratio table yet. The Airbus model is very different in concept of use, because it should be dropable, then there is no landing gear, which probably compensates for the space occupied by the folding wings and FCAS Remote Carriers are roughly the smallest in size, somewhere in the area of 7.5 m. And the largest so far is the Russian "Grom" - about 14 m long.@AkelaFreedom : Nice one!
Now let us know their respective estimated dimensions. Why not a profiles comparative diagram ?
Notice how Airbus design is the only one with a full set of rudder and elevator as the one with apparently the lowest internal volume available.
Thanks for the kind words. I create all my models in 3DS Max program.I know I have said this before but frankly I look at these and I am amazed. What you and the others show us makes us richer, I thank you Sir. Just in case I have not asked, are you using Blender or what else would do this quality of work.
Refueling Pod for modern fighters like "Rafale".
The full set can be seen here -
View attachment 654236
View attachment 654237
Maybe this is possible, but I am not an engineer I will not argueRefueling Pod for modern fighters like "Rafale".
The full set can be seen here -
View attachment 654236
View attachment 654237
Is it possible to bolt a probe to a drop tank to allow a quick-fit for in-air fuel reception?
Perhaps a modular external tank that simply hangs from an existing "wet' bomb rack?