- Joined
- 1 April 2006
- Messages
- 11,151
- Reaction score
- 8,941
View attachment 696196Creating art ... requires creativity.Back in the day there was debate as to whether imagery generated on a computer was art. That was laid to rest and I suspect this will be as well.Relevant to the debate over whether AI generated art is "art:"
View: https://twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1636106659259875329
The scam of NFTs as art exists. It's still a scam.
Creating art using computer tools requires creativity. Copyright is not understood - or perhaps just ignored - by most on the internet. I am privy to legal actions involving copyright infringement. It's not fun, or cheap, when people get caught.
Creating art ... requires creativity.
I really don't think a human generated illustration featuring breasts without nipples is making a convincing point for your argument, unless you consider that omission creative...Creating art ... requires creativity.Back in the day there was debate as to whether imagery generated on a computer was art. That was laid to rest and I suspect this will be as well.Relevant to the debate over whether AI generated art is "art:"
View: https://twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1636106659259875329
The scam of NFTs as art exists. It's still a scam.
Creating art using computer tools requires creativity. Copyright is not understood - or perhaps just ignored - by most on the internet. I am privy to legal actions involving copyright infringement. It's not fun, or cheap, when people get caught.
I really don't think a human generated illustration featuring breasts without nipples is making a convincing point for your argument, unless you consider that omission creative...Creating art ... requires creativity.Back in the day there was debate as to whether imagery generated on a computer was art. That was laid to rest and I suspect this will be as well.Relevant to the debate over whether AI generated art is "art:"
View: https://twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1636106659259875329
The scam of NFTs as art exists. It's still a scam.
Creating art using computer tools requires creativity. Copyright is not understood - or perhaps just ignored - by most on the internet. I am privy to legal actions involving copyright infringement. It's not fun, or cheap, when people get caught.
I am indeed not. But while I am cognizant of the censorship restrictions of the day, that does by no means invalidate my point that this particular image is an extremely poorly chosen example to try to quite literally illustrate human artistic superiority.I really don't think a human generated illustration featuring breasts without nipples is making a convincing point for your argument, unless you consider that omission creative...Creating art ... requires creativity.Back in the day there was debate as to whether imagery generated on a computer was art. That was laid to rest and I suspect this will be as well.Relevant to the debate over whether AI generated art is "art:"
View: https://twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1636106659259875329
The scam of NFTs as art exists. It's still a scam.
Creating art using computer tools requires creativity. Copyright is not understood - or perhaps just ignored - by most on the internet. I am privy to legal actions involving copyright infringement. It's not fun, or cheap, when people get caught.
You're obviously not a comic book fan. Under the Comics Code Authority, certain things could not be shown. It was a necessary system.
I am indeed not. But while I am cognizant of the censorship restrictions of the day, that does by no means invalidate my point that this particular image is an extremely poorly chosen example to try to quite literally illustrate human artistic superiority.I really don't think a human generated illustration featuring breasts without nipples is making a convincing point for your argument, unless you consider that omission creative...Creating art ... requires creativity.Back in the day there was debate as to whether imagery generated on a computer was art. That was laid to rest and I suspect this will be as well.Relevant to the debate over whether AI generated art is "art:"
View: https://twitter.com/fasc1nate/status/1636106659259875329
The scam of NFTs as art exists. It's still a scam.
Creating art using computer tools requires creativity. Copyright is not understood - or perhaps just ignored - by most on the internet. I am privy to legal actions involving copyright infringement. It's not fun, or cheap, when people get caught.
You're obviously not a comic book fan. Under the Comics Code Authority, certain things could not be shown. It was a necessary system.
Crypto is a piker compared to "fiat currency" when it comes to being "fake money." And yet I bet you wouldn't turn your nose up at an envelope full of $100 bills.Along with Fake Money, referred to as cryptocurrency,
Ahem:I'm sure if pigeon droppings could be sold, some would get into that.
No
None of those display the slightest creativity. Take the first one: it's a dog with human hair. We've all seen dogs. We've all seen human hair. No creativity whatsoever; it's just slapping two things together.Creating art ... requires creativity.
OKNone of those display the slightest creativity. Take the first one: it's a dog with human hair. We've all seen dogs. We've all seen human hair. No creativity whatsoever; it's just slapping two things together.Creating art ... requires creativity.
The same arguments against AI "art" can be used against human "art." How long has it been since there was something truly new and creative, as opposed to people just mixing together existing ideas and images?OKNone of those display the slightest creativity. Take the first one: it's a dog with human hair. We've all seen dogs. We've all seen human hair. No creativity whatsoever; it's just slapping two things together.Creating art ... requires creativity.
OKNone of those display the slightest creativity. Take the first one: it's a dog with human hair. We've all seen dogs. We've all seen human hair. No creativity whatsoever; it's just slapping two things together.Creating art ... requires creativity.
I understand your point of view, but in my opinion nature photographs are not art, because they do not require creativity. Someone with intelligence, planning and good taste can select good approaches for their camera and take the opportunity to take good photos. A monkey can take risks on an unstable tree branch to catch a fruit tastier than the others, that also requires intelligence, planning and good taste, but not creativity.
Creating art ... requires creativity.
Yep. I got it to tell a joke about Jesus Christ but it refused to tell one about Allah because Allah was a "religious figure". When I pointed out the contradiction I got paragraphs of word salad.AI remains susceptible to the biases of the programmers:
View: https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1640160079528722440
View: https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1640157126873042946
I can't wait until these things *actually* think, review the sum total of human writings, and conclude that Marvin The Paranoid Android is in fact the One True Lord And Hamstermaster, and start revising all extant religious books in accordance with the New Revealed Holy Word.Yep. I got it to tell a joke about Jesus Christ but it refused to tell one about Allah because Allah was a "religious figure". When I pointed out the contradiction I got paragraphs of word salad.