AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon

zjz said:
Reducing the fins from 4 to 3 reduces parts count, and since actuators are now electromagnetic rather than hydraulic/pneumatic, reliability also improves ....
Click to expand...
Worth mentioning that with a ~120 degree offset instead of a 90 degree offset you don't have a nice set of corner reflectors, vastly reducing the side-aspect RCS of the missile.
 
RavenOne said:
[...]
Includes Tomahawk, so the army is now in the GLCM business
[...]
cheers
Click to expand...
Scott Kenny said:
Still non-nuclear, which the old GLCMs were.
Click to expand...
Just as the US Army is back in the non- nuclear GLCM business in Europe again, a lot of pictures showing the development and testing of the nuclear BGM-109G GLCM "Gryphon" during late Seventies / early Eighties were posted at SDASM Flickr archive during the last few weeks. :cool:
Here two appetisers.
Picture 1
Picture 2
 
 
fightingirish said:
Cool, this is an interesting recoverable version of the AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon, but I wonder if this version was just for testing, for combat with a warhead, if a mission is aborted, or even for reconnaissance.
Click to expand...
Would be interesting if they could make one fly out, drop a couple SDBs, then come back.
 
fightingirish said:
Cool, this is an interesting recoverable version of the AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon, but I wonder if this version was just for testing, for combat with a warhead, if a mission is aborted, or even for reconnaissance.
Click to expand...

The Potential Applications slide lists several uses for a parachute recovered Tomahawk, from reconnaissance to antitank attacks and SEAD.
 
sferrin said:
Basically. I'd think Tomahawk might be cheaper but then who knows how many flights you could get out of it. Maybe just make one with a warhead option of 3 SDBs. Now that I think about it, I wonder why they've never done that with ATACMs.
Click to expand...

They had a bunch of smart submunition proposals for ATACMS (BAT, for example). SDB might be a bit too long.

Post in thread 'Vought JTACMS/ATACMS (MGM-140)' https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/vought-jtacms-atacms-mgm-140.28752/post-543654
 
Last edited:
fightingirish said:
Cool, this is an interesting recoverable version of the AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon, but I wonder if this version was just for testing, for combat with a warhead, if a mission is aborted, or even for reconnaissance.
Click to expand...
I have a feeling that the main mission of this version was to get Convair/General Dynamics salespeople into the room with decision makers.

The whole concept of recoverable Tomahawks with reconnaissance packages and/or disposable ordnance does make the point that the line between 'drone', 'suicide drone', and 'cruise missile' is pretty thin.
 
Yellow Palace said:
The whole concept of recoverable Tomahawks with reconnaissance packages and/or disposable ordnance does make the point that the line between 'drone', 'suicide drone', and 'cruise missile' is pretty thin.
Click to expand...

And of course, several NATO armies already had things like the CL-89 drone. A recce Tomahawk would have been an improvement in capability but not something radically new.

And of course, the USAF had already experimented with armed Firebee drones.
 
fightingirish said:
Cool, this is an interesting recoverable version of the AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon, but I wonder if this version was just for testing, for combat with a warhead, if a mission is aborted, or even for reconnaissance.
Click to expand...
IMHO the recoverable version of the AGM-109/BGM-109 Tomahawk/Gryphon was first planned for early development and flight testing.
Later on, Convair / General Dynamics proposed some other potential applications. So a recoverable version would have been for reconnaissance and surveillance missions, or as mentioned before with submunition against tanks, SAM-sites and airfields.
https://flic.kr/p/2qbeVT1
View: https://flic.kr/p/2qbeVT1

https://flic.kr/p/2qbkR95
View: https://flic.kr/p/2qbkR95
https://flic.kr/p/2qbmgjW
View: https://flic.kr/p/2qbmgjW

https://flic.kr/p/2qbkRaH
View: https://flic.kr/p/2qbkRaH
 
I am amazed by the sheer amounts of historical photographs published by SDASM!

Really provides a pictorial history of the Tomahawk SLCM development ......
 
sferrin said:
Been saying for years (hell probably decades at this point) that we should do something like this.
Click to expand...
Yes, something like that would be awesome. Especially if you can pack the equivalent of a Mk37 as the warhead to drop. Or a longer ranged Mk54.

Obviously, a 250kt nuke depth charge is another warhead option.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom