You can get to the Joe Rogan Elon Musk interview on Spotify here, but you have to sign up for a free account.

 
How many flights did that booster have under its belt? SpaceX seems to generally use its highest mileage boosters for in house launches.
 
Regarding the booster loss on Starlink L19 mission whilst attempting landing.

View: https://twitter.com/djsnm/status/1361720223766700032


Comparison of booster accelerations around time of entry burn - blue is last night's flight, red is from 2 weeks ago.
It's not a full 33% reduction in thrust so it wasn't a complete engine failure.
Afterwards you can see aerodynamic drag rises faster before loss of telemetry

View: https://twitter.com/bexben9/status/1361720718426337283


Decreased drag likely due to control system not aiming for the droneship after a detected anomaly

View: https://twitter.com/djsnm/status/1361721803320696832


It's consistent with it simply being deeper in the atmosphere at a higher speed
 
View: https://mobile.twitter.com/jackiewattles/status/1362888684987539457

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/jackiewattles/status/1362888686216441857

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/jackiewattles/status/1362888687613140999

View: https://mobile.twitter.com/jackiewattles/status/1362888690586980353
 



View: https://twitter.com/TeamTime/status/1359973422831345665
 
Last edited:
View: https://twitter.com/rookisaacman/status/1363237930798632964


Great trip. @SpaceX so impressive.
- "Hope" and I put on spacesuits. Functionally and visually . We announce her in 36 hrs!
- More mission details soon, but will be interesting to look down and maybe @Space_Station or @NASAHubble. Experiments and payload progress too
 
Go for launch: The FAA has granted SpaceX a launch license modification for Starship SN10. So we could see a flight this week as Elon said, pending successful static fire, which could come as early as today.

View: https://twitter.com/wapodavenport/status/1363880631961350145
 
Static fire test

View: https://twitter.com/BocaChicaGal/status/1364352262160572421


View: https://twitter.com/NASASpaceflight/status/1364350540193423363
 
View: https://twitter.com/TODAYshow/status/1363833023419084800

View: https://twitter.com/rookisaacman/status/1363812407274045440
 
changes a Boca Chica

New Launch pad
The Round foundations are so the worker for LOX, LCH4 and Water Tanks
They drilling next the Launch pad deep holes for concrete foundations,
for support Tower/Crane ?
in mean time the support ring for launch pad get completed

View: https://twitter.com/RGVaerialphotos/status/1363188934759485440




Nose cone of SN15 feature strange difference
instead header tank there plate installed

View: https://twitter.com/BocaChicaGal/status/1365020131634671626
 
After a record breaking engine swap, SpaceX static fires Starship SN10 for the second time this week. If the test was successful, SN10 is now ready for flight.

Video from Mary (@BocaChicaGal) and the NSF Robotic Camera Team. Edited by Brady Kenniston (@TheFavoritist)

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CshqxSkzSYg
 
View: https://twitter.com/BocaChicaGal/status/1366189604001488901


View: https://twitter.com/thejackbeyer/status/1366135904277061632
 
The ocean also provides a pretty handy abort mode. Just kick the rocket a couple hundred meters in any direction. I wonder though if the two rigs they bought can be adapted; I'd think there would be issues with center of gravity with a full up booster/starship. It's the weight USN destroyer; I'd think the vehicle could only be staged from the center of the platform. SpaceX would also need a fleet of ships to move boosters, starships, and fuel to the rigs...I can't imagine they could fuel more than one complete mission from locally stored fuel. But it probably is still easier to operate on the water rather than deal with all the issues of local inhabitants that will always be an issue unless you owned hundreds of square miles.
 
Whatever choice they take, the rig approach will induce a lot of, probably yet, unforeseen constraints that will affect their reach for a quick expansion. It's a bad idea.
 
Just a reminder this book is out tomorrow.

View: https://twitter.com/sciguyspace/status/1365406720961429507


I'll be doing a @reddit AMA on Tuesday in r/space to discuss LIFTOFF, SpaceX, and space in general. Anything goes!

 
From late last month:
 
Why the Falcon 9 didn’t land last month. It seems due to sheer re-use, that a particular component failed causing loss of an engine because that component was a life leader in its number of re-uses it had experienced. No Falcon 9 had seen so much re-use of that component. If your pioneering this sort of thing then I guess you can expect things like this.

 
The ocean also provides a pretty handy abort mode. Just kick the rocket a couple hundred meters in any direction. I wonder though if the two rigs they bought can be adapted; I'd think there would be issues with center of gravity with a full up booster/starship. It's the weight USN destroyer; I'd think the vehicle could only be staged from the center of the platform. SpaceX would also need a fleet of ships to move boosters, starships, and fuel to the rigs...I can't imagine they could fuel more than one complete mission from locally stored fuel. But it probably is still easier to operate on the water rather than deal with all the issues of local inhabitants that will always be an issue unless you owned hundreds of square miles.
I guess all these isues with floating platfororm will be solved till engineers sart building of this platform. As you have mentioned this is much better to lauch Starship somewhere from a sea than from the ground frome some specialy prepared area.
 
Third times the charm with SN10 successfully performing a soft landing. SN11 next.
 
looks little bit like the tower of Pisa
but it stay upright and no RUD
 

Attachments

  • SN10 standing.jpeg
    SN10 standing.jpeg
    139.8 KB · Views: 3


Write your reply...

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom