Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)

GTX said:
Given it's very limited reported use I don't think it has made much impact what-so-ever.
Click to expand...
Well, Kiev power station(too well defended for large strategic LACMs) begs to differ.
Unlike the F-35(which, despite several combat situations, has literally nothing to point to as "its" success).

So I would be careful of what-so-ever.
 
Ainen said:
Well, Kiev power station(too well defended for large strategic LACMs) begs to differ.
Unlike the F-35(which, despite several combat situations, has literally nothing to point to as "its" success).

So I would be careful of what-so-ever.
Click to expand...
Can you expand on this? Links?
 
Bruno Anthony said:
To replace the numbers of planned F-35s
Click to expand...
How did this get to be about replacement of F-35s? That is something that won't be an issue for another 20 - 40yrs.

You commented that "...the -35 just seems to get further and further behind and entire alliances are dependent on it. Too much shoved into this one basic airframe in my opinion."

To which I responded that "Consider the fact that some 21 countries have either purchased and are operating or are awaiting their F-35s. I seem to think that all of the air staff making the recommendations might know a thing or two about the capabilities vs other options on the table." - by which I am referring to the fact that despite some in the media/on forums trying to paint the F-35 as a failure/problem aircraft, those who make the decisions to buy aircraft in the Air Forces, and whom have better access to facts than those in the media/forums, are still lining up to buy (21 countries so far) - hardly a failure.

Your response to this that "There aren’t any and there won’t be any." which I take to mean that you are implying that there "aren’t any [other options on the table] and there won’t be any." doesn't make sense when the F-35 has been up against the other options I listed in numerous cases to date.

I still don't get to where the "5,000 of them?" comment comes from.

If you are talking about future F-35 replacements then this is hardly the thread for that...and besides it is something for 20 - 40yrs in the future.
 
Scott Kenny said:
Makes you wonder if it'd be possible to just swap the guts out with the ATP-SE hardware.

Annoying difficulty of LO aircraft, gotta build in any new tech instead of bolting on a pod like 4gen planes do.
Click to expand...

When will the VLO Sniper ATP be made.
 
GTX said:
And which combat situations would those be?
Click to expand...
There are 3 big cases where F-35 did take part in combat operations, as of yet.

First is the Gaza campaign - hard to tell what it did there, but murky Israeli comments together with at least one photo with AMRAAMs(!) don't exactly inspire (decreasing war crime potential isn't an achievement for a combat vehicle).
Second is Red Sea intercepts and strikes in Yemen - no additional value over 4th gens in the latter (even typhoons do it just fine), lower value than them in former (2 sidewinder limit, as it turned out, matters).
Third is the recent Iranian strike intercept - where again, F-35 didn't do anything special. Lack of full integration between main optic (EOTS) and a2a modes for an integrated package until block 4 is quite damning here - how did they even manage not to integrate them?
Yes, EOTS of course can work like any other pod...but while it would be an achievement for a Russian aircraft, everyone else (literally) have them.

One may rightfully say, that none of those situations play to F-35 strengths, which is true.
But it already had where it could potentially shine - but didn't.


You, however, argue that Su-57 didn't have a combat impact whatsoever. As you can see, it already did - literally the moment it entered something similar to normal operations. It did significant harm and raised alarm in Ukraine.

More painful still is that this capability (delayed specialized weapon integration) is the largest complaint about modern F-35.
 
Ainen said:
There are 3 big cases where F-35 did take part in combat operations, as of yet.

First is the Gaza campaign - hard to tell what it did there, but murky Israeli comments together with at least one photo with AMRAAMs(!) don't exactly inspire (decreasing war crime potential isn't an achievement for a combat vehicle).
Second is Red Sea intercepts and strikes in Yemen - no additional value over 4th gens in the latter (even typhoons do it just fine), lower value than them in former (2 sidewinder limit, as it turned out, matters).
Third is the recent Iranian strike intercept - where again, F-35 didn't do anything special. Lack of full integration between main optic (EOTS) and a2a modes for an integrated package until block 4 is quite damning here - how did they even manage not to integrate them?
Yes, EOTS of course can work like any other pod...but while it would be an achievement for a Russian aircraft, everyone else (literally) have them.

One may rightfully say, that none of those situations play to F-35 strengths, which is true.
But it already had where it could potentially shine - but didn't.


You, however, argue that Su-57 didn't have a combat impact whatsoever. As you can see, it already did - literally the moment it entered something similar to normal operations. It did significant harm and raised alarm in Ukraine.

More painful still is that this capability (delayed specialized weapon integration) is the largest complaint about modern F-35.
Click to expand...
Incomplete post. First combat use of the F-35 was in 2018 when Israeli F-35I struck targets in Syria completely unmolested from Syrian S-300 and Russian S-400 SAM systems. USMC used the F-35B in combat for the first time over Afghanistan that same year. First combat use by the USAF was in 2019 when F-35As were used to strike ISIS targets in Iraq.
 
GAO report:

Some highlights:
* If TR-3 is not qualified in April 2024 (I havent heard that it was) then in June 2024 Lockheed Martin will exceed their maximum capacity for parking undelivered F-35's at its various production facilities. The exact number of currently undelivered aircraft is classified. LM claim they can inspect and deliver 20 aircraft a month once the change to TR-3 is approved but the highest previously achieved monthly inspection and delivery rate was 13, even if it achieves its claimed delivery rate it will take over a year to fully clear the parked backlog.
* P&W did not deliver any new engines to the F-35 Assembly lines on time in 2023 with an average of each engine being 2 months late, an increase from 97% late with an average of 1 month delay in 2022. This isnt really affecting production though due to the delays in TR-3 causing a delivery backlog.
* Test fleet consists of four aircraft that are all over 10 years old and experiencing maintenance issues, one has been long term out of service so they are behind on weapons integration work, again due to being unable to test the new TR-3 software this isnt impacting the schedule too severely but a backlog of integration work is building up that will all hit at once once TR-3 is approved. To alleviate this they are building 4 additional test aircraft which are semi-instrumented and will be available from 2026 while a complete fleet renewal of 9 instrumented test aircraft is planned for delivery between 2029 and 2034 in batches of 3 (6 ordered so far) though this will leave a gap in 2028 & 2029 where no fully instrumented test aircraft are in service.
* Engine cooling upgrade is required from 2029 when planned post Block 4 capabilities will start requiring it however its not planned to be in service until 2030 with 2032 a more realistic in service date.
* New problem, the F-35C landing gear drag brace is experiencing more force during landings than it was originally designed for which could lead to a landing gear collapse, after 1300 landings it should be inspected every 200 landings until a permanent fix is developed.
* The issue with cracking of the panels around the F-35A internal gun due to pressure experienced on earlier lots has returned, this isn't due to FOD. The panel should be inspected for cracks everytime the gun has been fired, a replacement more durable panel will be live fire tested during 2024.
* The EOD window panel is experiencing poor durability in sandy environments (I thought this panel was made of factory grown sapphire!!??). Work to qualify a replacement window will take place in 2024.
* Some F-35 canopies across all models have experienced delamination of the external coating. A temporary fix was implemented in 2019 with a canopy vent hole to reduce pressure difference between layers but too small to de-pressurise the cockpit. In 2022 a secondary canopy supplier was qualified for A and C models and they are looking to qualify a secondary supplier for B models during 2024.
 
Last edited:
Ainen said:
I don't remember anything bad about su-57 in Ukraine. There is not enough of it, but it just started its production run - it's simply young.
Also we don't know that much, other than that by 2024 it clearly has its LACM integrated, unlike the F-35 (which waits for block 4, and its internal jsow-er died anyway).
On the other hand - we don't know for sure what else is (or isn't) integrated there. And it's again somewhat unfair to f-35, which is far more exposed.
Click to expand...

The whole not being exposed bit is key, but Russian claims about it are short on proof. We know that it has once, while being escorted by two SU-35's, launched X-69's over friendly territory. This is not particularly impressive. By similar standards, the US could claim that the F-35 can utilize any Block 4 weapon it has live fired at least once.

Ainen said:
Well, Kiev power station(too well defended for large strategic LACMs) begs to differ.
Unlike the F-35(which, despite several combat situations, has literally nothing to point to as "its" success).

So I would be careful of what-so-ever.
Click to expand...

Which is not exactly much to brag about. As per Wikipedia: On 16 April 2024, President Zelenskyy said that “Eleven missiles were launched towards the Trypillya [thermal power] station, upon which the electricity supply in the Kyiv region depends. We managed to intercept the first seven, but the remaining four hit Trypillya. Why? Because we had zero missiles left. We have exhausted all the missiles that were defending Trypillya”. Literal Shaheeds got through.

Finally, I believe that not even the Russians have claimed that the X-69's in question were launched by SU-57's and they are primarily launched from non-stealthy aircraft.

Meanwhile, the F-35's actually do have documented combat success. We have on-board video footage of them shooting down Houthi drones and low-flying cruise missiles using both AMRAAM and AIM-9X. This also demonstrated the link between EOTS and A2A modes, which while not at full Block 4 levels yet, does already exist.

There is also proof of them conducting ground attack with JDAMs and EOTS-designated laser-guided bombs. Finally, we have detailed evidence of testing and large-scale combat exercises. More importantly is operating and piercing S-300 defended areas as mentioned above.
 
NTKV said:
Finally, I believe that not even the Russians have claimed that the X-69's in question were launched by SU-57's and they are primarily launched from non-stealthy aircraft.
Click to expand...

So they launched several AS-22 Kazoos which I understand are the Russian equivalent of the Storm Shadow/Taurus cruise-missiles.

As for those Russian missiles getting through and severely damaging the power-station well hopefully the aid-packages on their way will give the Ukrainians much needed replacement SAMs very soon.
 
red admiral said:
On different aircraft. You might as well add TIALD and Pave Spike to that list.

But don't let get that in the way of your F-35 / LM bad narrative
Click to expand...

The reason why I omitted TIALD and Pave Spike was because they weren't around when F-35 was being delivered to the UK...the other 3 were.

And it wasn't an 'F-35/LM bad narrative'......merely an observation that Advanced EOTS will very much not be 'Advanced' by the time it could enter service if anyone actually ordered it....which based on the news of Advanced EOTS out there appears to not be happening....so LM may need to refresh their approach to gain traction.

If you're going to sell a fighter aircraft and market it as the most advanced out there you're going to need to keep one of the key systems regularly refreshed so that its not obsolescent when purchased...given the pace of change in the world of optics it most definitely will be....and also calls into question its long term supportability.

Every single F-35 having a laser designation pod is in many ways a huge advantage. For normal fighter fleets there is never enough targeting pods to go around, even in the most well resourced air forces. Now you can have a fleet where every aircraft has it baked in. But....if that internal solution is obsolete and cannot generate the imagery necessary to meet tight ROE it goes from being a massive advantage to a huge disadvantage as there is no qualified external pod, and an internal upgrade takes a long, long time....

The DAS sensors on F-35 appear to be truly 'plug and play', replaceable in normal first line maintenance and many operators have already contracted for the upgrade. But none have contracted for Advanced EOTS....
 
WatcherZero said:
* If TR-3 is not qualified in April 2024 (I havent heard that it was) then in June 2024 Lockheed Martin will exceed their maximum capacity for parking undelivered F-35's at its various production facilities. The exact number of currently undelivered aircraft is classified. LM claim they can inspect and deliver 20 aircraft a month once the change to TR-3 is approved but the highest previously achieved monthly inspection and delivery rate was 13, even if it achieves its claimed delivery rate it will take over a year to fully clear the parked backlog.
Click to expand...

I think based on production and the numbers placed in storage last year that by the end of June it will be c140 F-35 parked up...
 
timmymagic said:
AS-22's direct Western equivalent would be more like SLAM
Click to expand...

I was referring to the advanced variant which I suppose would be the AS-22B which if you've seen photographs of does have a resemblance to the Storm Shadow and Taurus cruise-missiles.
 
GTX said:
still don't get to where the "5,000 of them?" comment comes from.
Click to expand...
I thought I was pretty clear I was referring to that there’s no alternative at this point to the f-35 should it be canceled. It’s all the way with the f-35.
 
I suspect all internal designators are going to lag behind their podded equivalents. It’s simply a much more invasive integration that always will be more expensive in time and cost to swap out, and design freeze of changes to the initial aircraft or its upgrade spirals will necessarily freeze any forward advance of the sensor.
 
Bruno Anthony said:
I thought I was pretty clear I was referring to that there’s no alternative at this point to the f-35 should it be canceled. It’s all the way with the f-35.
Click to expand...

Well only the first thousand or so will be built below Blk 4 standards.
 
Bruno Anthony said:
I thought I was pretty clear I was referring to that there’s no alternative at this point to the f-35 should it be canceled. It’s all the way with the f-35.
Click to expand...
It certainly was not clear.

Either way. there is no chance of F-35 being cancelled now.

Countries do have alternatives: Typhoon, Rafale, Gripen, F-15, F/A-18E/F etc etc...they just don't want them since the F-35 is far better. As has been proven in competition after competition.
 
Last edited:
GTX said:
It certainly was not clear.

Either way. there is no chance of F-35 being cancelled now.

Countries do have alternatives: Typhoon, Rafael, Gripen, F-15, F/A-18E/F etc etc...they just don't want them since the F-35 is far better. As has been proven in competition after competition.
Click to expand...
My mistake on lack of clarity I guess.
Post in thread 'Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)'
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...ii-joint-strike-fighter-jsf.17732/post-680067

Competition after competition of static RCS testing the f-35 won hands down. In terms of aeronautical performance, the f-35 lost at engine start up.
 
GTX said:
Countries do have alternatives: Typhoon, Rafael, Gripen, F-15, F/A-18E/F etc etc...they just don't want them since the F-35 is far better. As has been proven in competition after competition.
Click to expand...
Rafale :mad: not Rafael.
Rafale, F-15EX, and, to a lesser degree, Typhoon get orders together with F-35, to be fair.
 
Ainen said:
Rafale :mad: not Rafael.
Rafale, F-15EX, and, to a lesser degree, Typhoon get orders together with F-35, to be fair.
Click to expand...
Sorry - autocorrect and failure to take note. Fixed now.

Orders aren't in same numbers
 
Bruno Anthony said:
Competition after competition of static RCS testing the f-35 won hands down. In terms of aeronautical performance, the f-35 lost at engine start up.
Click to expand...

I heard/saw F-35s for the first time last summer. They make the local F-15s seem positively quiet in comparison. Apparently the local guard unit is upgrading from their 15Cs to F-35.
 
Josh_TN said:
I heard/saw F-35s for the first time last summer. They make the local F-15s seem positively quiet in comparison. Apparently the local guard unit is upgrading from their 15Cs to F-35.
Click to expand...
Yeah, we had an air show at my local Air Guard base with Thunderbirds and the Solo F35 demo September 2023. The F35 has a bass rumble that was more intense (can't say it was louder, didn't have a sound meter) than the quartet of F16s that were more or less doing the same maneuvers in the same place. I could feel the F35 in my chest, but not the F16s.

That bass rumble carries a long way, even if it's not any louder by decibel measurement at the airport fence than a high pitched sound.
 
It would appear that the USMC is about to retire its' last Harrier Its replacing them with F-35Bs:


Final public display of the US Marine Corps AV-8B before switching to the F-35B
Click to expand...
Last weekend, on May 11 and 12, 2024, Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point in North Carolina held an event open to the public. With fine weather, the event attracted many enthusiastic visitors to view various military exhibitions and demonstrations.
Click to expand...
Spectators had the opportunity to witness the final public appearance of the AV-8B Harrier II, presented by Marine Attack Squadron (VMA) 231 Ace of Spades (‘CG-xx’). This demonstration was an emotional historical moment, showing the skill and capabilities of this legendary fighter aircraft.
Click to expand...
According to a USNI News report, more than 80,000 aviation enthusiasts packed the runway on Saturday, the first day of the event.
Click to expand...
VMA-231 was the last frontline unit to fly the AV-8B Harrier II-plus, the most modern version of the Harrier family. This fighter aircraft was originally developed by BAE in England and first introduced in 1969. The Harrier II-plus is equipped with advanced technology and superior maneuverability, making it a mainstay in various military operations for decades.
Click to expand...
The AV-8B Harrier II, manufactured by McDonnell Douglas (now Boeing), first flew in 1981 and entered service in 1985. The aircraft underwent numerous improvements over the original version, including more advanced avionics, increased endurance, and capabilities. improved combat capability, making it one of the most effective tactical attack aircraft in modern military history.
Click to expand...
The U.S. Marine Corps Harrier Squadron completed its final deployment in March 2024 with the Bataan Amphibious Ready Group and the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit. For more than eight months, they operated in the Middle East and the Mediterranean Sea, carrying out a variety of strategic missions that included close air support, reconnaissance and conflict prevention operations. This deployment marks the end of an era for AV-8B Harrier IIs in active missions, highlighting their significant contribution to security and stability in the region.
Click to expand...
According to the Marine Corps Aviation Plan, VMA-231 will begin transitioning to the F-35B Lightning II starting next year. They are expected to achieve safe flight status with the six STOVL jets in the third quarter of Fiscal Year 2026. This transition marks an important step in the modernization of the US Marine Corps, strengthening their air combat capabilities with advanced and versatile aircraft such as the F-35B.
Click to expand...
According to the plan, within 24 months of reaching initial operational capability, VMA-231 is expected to have a total of 16 F-35B stealth jets in their inventory. This transition marks the US Marine Corps' commitment to strengthening their air presence with the latest technology, ensuring that the squadron is ready to meet future challenges with a larger force.
Click to expand...
Thank You.
Click to expand...
#marines #usa #usmilitary #defence #fighterjet #update #airforce #av8b #takeoff
Click to expand...

Now in regards to the loudness of the F-35 I can't comment as I've never seen one in real life however at an international air-show at Auckland International Airport (It was either 1990 or 1992) an RAF Harrier GR Mk 3 appeared (This was not long before they were retired) and did an aerial display and it was LOUD.
 
Scott Kenny said:
Yeah, we had an air show at my local Air Guard base with Thunderbirds and the Solo F35 demo September 2023. The F35 has a bass rumble that was more intense (can't say it was louder, didn't have a sound meter) than the quartet of F16s that were more or less doing the same maneuvers in the same place. I could feel the F35 in my chest, but not the F16s.

That bass rumble carries a long way, even if it's not any louder by decibel measurement at the airport fence than a high pitched sound.
Click to expand...

Yeah, there was a particular back and forth rippling rumble to it that I have not heard before. It was not just loud; it had an unmistakable pitch change to it that was kinda like if sheet lighting was louder and had a higher frequency. It occilates a lot.
 
Can agree with you about the Harrier being loud NMaude, though it also had a characteristic whine to it when the Pegasus engine started.
 

Belgian F-35A completes first flight | Shephard

The Belgian Air Force’s first F-35A Lightning II has taken flight, showcasing the national flag, with the first force’s first four F-35As set to head to Luke AFB for initial training amid software upgrade delays.
www.shephardmedia.com

Contrary to the Royal Netherlands Air Force F-35As, the Belgian Lightning IIs will all be completed in the US, with only the central wings and outer wing boxes constructed at the FACO facility in Cameri, Italy.

The first four F-35As will be delivered to Luke AFB, Arizona, where they will join the 312th Fighter Squadron, part of the 56th Fighter Wing. [...]

The remaining 30 aircraft will be based at Kleine Brogel and Florennes air bases. The latter, however, will not see the first aircraft arriving before April 2025, with Kleine Brogel having to wait until 2027.
Click to expand...
 

Negotiators have been discussing U.S. sales of F-35 fighter jets and other weapons to the Saudis as part of the deal, a U.S. official said.
The potential sale of the F-35s to the Saudis was not guaranteed for a variety of reasons, but its inclusion in the discussions was significant because Riyadh has desired the stealthy fighter jet for years. Any deal must satisfy a longstanding agreement with Israel that U.S. weapons sold in the region must not impair Israel's "qualitative military edge," guaranteeing U.S. weapons furnished to Israel are "superior in capability" to those sold to its neighbors. The U.S. Senate Foreign Relations and House of Representatives Foreign Affairs committees, whose members have criticized the kingdom's role in civilian deaths in Yemen, have the right to review, and block, weapons sales under an informal review process. Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N), opens new tab, which makes the jet, referred a request for comment to the government.
Click to expand...
 
[F-35B] crashes near University and Rio Bravo [off airfield at Albuquerque airport] after takeoff (female pilot ejected, presumed seriously* injured):

1716934524555.png

www.kob.com

Military aircraft crashes near University and Rio Bravo

Crews are responding to a military aircraft crash near University and Rio Bravo Tuesday afternoon. AFR says one person was rescued from the downed aircraft.
www.kob.com www.kob.com
abcnews.go.com

Military aircraft crashes off of airfield near Albuquerque airport

A military aircraft has crashed off of the airfield at the Albuquerque International Sunport, the primary international airport in New Mexico, officials said.
abcnews.go.com abcnews.go.com

*Edit (source):
Lt. Jason Fejer, an Albuquerque Fire Rescue spokesman, said the pilot was able to eject from the cockpit before the crash but suffered “serious injuries.”
Click to expand...

Contractor flight (USMC aircraft was flown back to LM):
 
Last edited:
VFR, bright vis, fair wind. Not the weather at least.

I am amazed that no station has yet stated the obvious, that it is an F-35, one hour after the first video reports! (see screen-print of KOB feed above)

Seems there is a video here:
www.wdbo.com

VIDEO: $80 million F-35 fighter jet crashes on takeoff from Albuquerque airport; pilot injured

A military plane crashed at the Albuquerque Sunport on Tuesday. Officials say only one person was on the aircraft at the time.
www.wdbo.com www.wdbo.com

The Aviationist complete report (minus the above alleged video):

theaviationist.com

F-35 Crashes Near Albuquerque Airport, New Mexico

An F-35 crashed near Albuquerque International. According to the first reports, the pilot successfully ejected. An F-35 Lightning II aircraft has crashed
theaviationist.com theaviationist.com
 
Last edited:
TomcatViP said:
Seems there is a video here:
www.wdbo.com

VIDEO: $80 million F-35 fighter jet crashes on takeoff from Albuquerque airport; pilot injured

A military plane crashed at the Albuquerque Sunport on Tuesday. Officials say only one person was on the aircraft at the time.
www.wdbo.com www.wdbo.com
Click to expand...

I clicked on the link and got this message:

We’re Sorry!​

This website is unavailable in your location.

Error 451​

It appears you are attempting to access this website from a country outside of the United States, therefore access cannot be granted at this time.
Click to expand...
 

Similar threads

Back
Top Bottom