archipeppe said:
Interesting, it really looks like the Piaggio P 50-I Bomber (except that the Piaggio has push-pull configuration).
For me is Piaggio P 50-I ! :D
 
Meanwhile, following the suggestion that was made to me in PM, here's what a pusher B-15 could have looked like.
According to Hesham's images on post#42, the pusher version model shows in-line engines. It was the V-1710 the engine originally intended for the tractor version.

BTW the link to the document doesn't works.
 
According to Hesham's images on post#42, the pusher version model shows in-line engines. It was the V-1710 the engine originally intended for the tractor version.

BTW the link to the document doesn't works.

Unfortunately I can't find it in my files my dear Antonio !.
 
Many thanks Apophenia

The XB-15 tractor version drawings from April 1938 NACA report are V-1710 powered. Nice finding!
 
B-17 might have had better firing arcs with alternating nacelles and a thicker wing?
Outboard tractor—end of nacelle turret and vice versa…thinner waist,
 
I feel the pictures are not clear,so I repeat sending them in a good appearance.

From Aero Digest 1937,

so weird,they called it a transport aircraft (not bomber) ?
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    412.8 KB · Views: 40
  • 2.png
    2.png
    1.4 MB · Views: 37
  • 4.png
    4.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 31
Loading and unloading that configuratiopn would be a trifle hazardous. Similar denomination to saying a Land Ship is an oil tank?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom