Why? If it can be deployed it can be folded back in the cargo bay.As an added note, the solar panels would make the atmospheric interface maneuvers she is talking about impossible.
Why? If it can be deployed it can be folded back in the cargo bay.As an added note, the solar panels would make the atmospheric interface maneuvers she is talking about impossible.
Why? If it can be deployed it can be folded back in the cargo bay.As an added note, the solar panels would make the atmospheric interface maneuvers she is talking about impossible.
Its not like an accordion where you can take it out and play with it any time you want. If it jams you have some serious aerodynamic fatalities upon re-entry.
#X37B is setting space endurance records for a returnable spacecraft at 741 days and counting – working daily for the @USAirForce. #ASC19 pic.twitter.com/sG6eaxFr3B
— Boeing Space (@BoeingSpace) September 18, 2019
The #X37B Orbital Test Vehicle Mission 5 back home at Kennedy Space Center after 780 days in space.
— Nathan Barker (@NASA_Nerd) October 27, 2019
📸 Credit US Air Force pic.twitter.com/xyFeaCZ5Vv
Couple of questions for you guys.
Is there a follow-on to the x-37? Something larger and more useful? Optionally manned? Or would that become by defacto the Black Horse? Is it possible it could be used as a strike weapon against maritime targets or china's new island bases because it can change its idk what to call it, its flight profile? Could it or a derivative be our first space-bomber? Idk if these are silly questions.
There was a concept for a larger X-37C, see https://www.space.com/13230-secretive-37b-space-plane-future-astronauts.html, but nothing came of it.Couple of questions for you guys.
Is there a follow-on to the x-37? Something larger and more useful? Optionally manned? Or would that become by defacto the Black Horse? Is it possible it could be used as a strike weapon against maritime targets or china's new island bases because it can change its idk what to call it, its flight profile? Could it or a derivative be our first space-bomber? Idk if these are silly questions.
The statement that this @usairforce X-37 flight deployed small satellites is alarming, since the US has not reported those deployments in its UN Registration Convention submissions. This would be the first time that either the USA or Russia has blatantly flouted the Convention. https://t.co/mpLWuvsECV
— Jonathan McDowell (@planet4589) October 27, 2019
I imagine there are a lot of satellites up there that haven't been announced to the world. Also, do they say if they left them in orbit or if the collected them back up and brought them back? But hey, as long as we get to generate a controversy.(Not you, the author.)
Why you put this information in the X-37B thread? It have nothing to see with the X-37b ?
Ok sorry I don't understand thank for the newWhy you put this information in the X-37B thread? It have nothing to see with the X-37b ?
AFSPC-07 is the OTV-6 launch that’s why.
Another #AtlasV launch campaign begins with Launch Vehicle on Stand (LVOS) day! Today at Cape Canaveral, technicians will start assembling the #AtlasV 501 rocket that will launch the United States Space Force-7 (#USSF7) mission. Watch for tweets throughout the day! pic.twitter.com/3fYxOibuiu
— ULA (@ulalaunch) April 23, 2020
The Vertical Integration Facility's overhead crane is working in tandem with a ground handling fixture to guide the 107-foot-long #AtlasV first stage to stand upright. pic.twitter.com/5F4eYe6qDu
— ULA (@ulalaunch) April 23, 2020
This will be ULA's 139th flight since the company was formed. Nearly two-thirds of those missions have delivered critical U.S. national security payloads into space, all successfully. pic.twitter.com/clsucXiafe
— ULA (@ulalaunch) April 23, 2020
The #AtlasV first stage is being secured to the Mobile Launch Platform inside the Vertical Integration Facility to complete LVOS. In the days ahead, the Centaur upper stage will be added and a full testing program conducted to verify the rocket is ready to receive its payload. pic.twitter.com/tu9VxzP94J
— ULA (@ulalaunch) April 23, 2020
These are the first new images of X-37B pre-launch processing we have since OTV-1 10 years ago, I did ask @torybruno so thank you I think ;-) #X37B #OTV6 #USSF7 https://t.co/QrYoZLPUjt pic.twitter.com/yWqmt2pBBY
— DutchSpace (@DutchSpace) May 6, 2020
Right, 3 new X-37B images released so far, so more image research for me, full nerd analysis coming later :) #X37B #OTV6 #USSF7 pic.twitter.com/G6o3BpvGP8
— DutchSpace (@DutchSpace) May 6, 2020
Newer technology. Lower cost. Faster to install
— Tory Bruno (@torybruno) May 6, 2020
Of course I can't help myself and have to look into the new photos, at first glance (TBC) it looks like OTV-6 is vehicle 1, if true, this would make sense, as OTV-4 and OTV-5 were likely both flown by vehicle 2 as vehicle 1 was down for the new aft service module mod. #X37B #OTV6 pic.twitter.com/aPlu5bO0zP
— DutchSpace (@DutchSpace) May 6, 2020
Atlas V 501.Any idea what the launch vehicle is?Looks like ULA.