Western Artists' Concepts of Soviet aircraft during the Cold War

Flateric's pix were originally derived from USAF public briefing documents. They were shown on screens but not handed out.
Shortly thereafter the practice of packing Leica R3 with 180mm/2.8 lens into such events was discouraged ;D.
...
 

Attachments

  • 059.jpg
    059.jpg
    342.4 KB · Views: 114
Found it
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20230911_185055_ReadEra.jpg
    Screenshot_20230911_185055_ReadEra.jpg
    461.2 KB · Views: 107
Well, I found the original mention of "Fearless" in 1971. Perhaps it was a US "design study" of a possible Soviet response to the F-15 program made during the F-15 development?
 

Attachments

  • 80744 No Points For Second Place_vwr.mov_snapshot_17.04_[2023.10.10_02.30.26].jpg
    80744 No Points For Second Place_vwr.mov_snapshot_17.04_[2023.10.10_02.30.26].jpg
    196.2 KB · Views: 89
  • 80744 No Points For Second Place_vwr.mov_snapshot_15.31_[2023.10.10_02.31.26].jpg
    80744 No Points For Second Place_vwr.mov_snapshot_15.31_[2023.10.10_02.31.26].jpg
    180 KB · Views: 96
Last edited:

Attachments

  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021319.951.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021319.951.jpg
    323.5 KB · Views: 103
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021324.578.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021324.578.jpg
    294 KB · Views: 106
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021329.470.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021329.470.jpg
    376.4 KB · Views: 108
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021333.558.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021333.558.jpg
    350.6 KB · Views: 120
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021337.441.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021337.441.jpg
    386.2 KB · Views: 127
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021341.299.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021341.299.jpg
    357.4 KB · Views: 126
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021350.324.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021350.324.jpg
    385.6 KB · Views: 122
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021354.231.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021354.231.jpg
    328.3 KB · Views: 105
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021358.379.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021358.379.jpg
    314 KB · Views: 106
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021402.744.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021402.744.jpg
    355.2 KB · Views: 112
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021406.451.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021406.451.jpg
    391.8 KB · Views: 123
That's very interesting - provides the source for the grainy 'Mi-27 Super Hind' posted earlier in this thread from a 1980s magazine, whichever magazine it was they obviously took the Hughes 'Mi-28 Havoc' artwork and gave it a new name. Probably because it looks like a 'Hind' with different engines! Why Hughes thought that is odd, their 'Hokum' looks like a single-seater Apache!
Refreshing to see reasonably accurate 'Fulcrum' and 'Frogfoot' though.
 
Little Photoshop on some of the pictures. Nice illustrations.
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021354.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021354.jpg
    335.6 KB · Views: 103
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021402.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021402.jpg
    378.1 KB · Views: 105
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021341.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021341.jpg
    369 KB · Views: 101
  • s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021337.jpg
    s-l1600 - 2023-10-29T021337.jpg
    349.7 KB · Views: 99
The last image from Flateric's post#420 it's identified as "Mi-28 Havoc" while clearly it isn't. Early illustrations on Western Press roughly matched the 90's Soviet next gen attack helicopters appearance from the beginning. But that "Mi-28" is something totally different, looking more like an advanced Mi-24 development. I had the very same image in a magazine from the 80's which was lost as a result of moving to a new home. I vaguely recall that it was identified as "Mi-35" but I can't prove it.
 
That's very interesting - provides the source for the grainy 'Mi-27 Super Hind' posted earlier in this thread from a 1980s magazine, whichever magazine it was they obviously took the Hughes 'Mi-28 Havoc' artwork and gave it a new name. Probably because it looks like a 'Hind' with different engines! Why Hughes thought that is odd, their 'Hokum' looks like a single-seater Apache!
Refreshing to see reasonably accurate 'Fulcrum' and 'Frogfoot' though.
I’ve never seen that version of Hokum before.
 
Indeed it was Antonio who posted it earlier in the thread, at that time he identified it as "Mi-27" but no source given sadly: https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/th...aft-during-the-cold-war.275/page-4#post-42001
2008? Thanks. The source of my scanned picture was that old magazine I lost after moving home as I referred here on post#430. I can't remember the magazine's name, probably a helicopter specialised one.

The question is: if the art originated from Hughes, clearly labeled as "Mi-28 Havoc" then why the article in the magazine referred it as "Mi-27 Super Hind"?.

I have started a revision of my old magazine boxes. I haven't lost my hope about this magazine could be still buried into one of them
 
I contacted the seller to see if he could provide more info on the models. He said these were produced in the early early 1980's by Al Parker. Parker worked for Hughes in their model shop and also produced patterns and models to the aircraft industry. He was also involved with a company called Marketing Aids (out of business) that manufactured factory models for the aviation industry. I think there was a book back in the 1980s called Soviet Warplanes. They had some artist concepts of what the next generation of Soviet aircraft would look like. These models seem similar to what was in that book if I recall correctly.
Al Parker's Fulcrum & Flanker(?)
 

Attachments

  • $_3 (51).JPG
    $_3 (51).JPG
    103.6 KB · Views: 46
  • $_3 (50).JPG
    $_3 (50).JPG
    108.9 KB · Views: 47
  • $_3 (47).JPG
    $_3 (47).JPG
    91.9 KB · Views: 41
  • $_3 (48).JPG
    $_3 (48).JPG
    98.9 KB · Views: 40
  • $_3 (49).JPG
    $_3 (49).JPG
    145.7 KB · Views: 38
  • $_3 (46).JPG
    $_3 (46).JPG
    102 KB · Views: 39
  • $_3 (45).JPG
    $_3 (45).JPG
    84.3 KB · Views: 40
  • $_3 (44).JPG
    $_3 (44).JPG
    145.7 KB · Views: 37
  • $_3 (41).JPG
    $_3 (41).JPG
    73 KB · Views: 34
  • $_3 (42).JPG
    $_3 (42).JPG
    80 KB · Views: 34
  • $_3 (43).JPG
    $_3 (43).JPG
    92.1 KB · Views: 33
  • $_3 (40).JPG
    $_3 (40).JPG
    81.3 KB · Views: 31
  • $_3 (39).JPG
    $_3 (39).JPG
    85.6 KB · Views: 33
  • $_3 (37).JPG
    $_3 (37).JPG
    84.3 KB · Views: 36
  • $_3 (38).JPG
    $_3 (38).JPG
    79.1 KB · Views: 33
Last edited:
From Naval Aviation News 1958,

amazing projects (in early two pictures).
 

Attachments

  • 6.png
    6.png
    1,011 KB · Views: 48
  • 5.png
    5.png
    819.8 KB · Views: 49
  • 3.png
    3.png
    401.3 KB · Views: 49
  • 2.png
    2.png
    572.9 KB · Views: 53
  • 1.png
    1.png
    650.6 KB · Views: 52
From Air Pictorial 1951/7,

they talked about Russian Pick-a-Back bombers,so maybe just an idea only,specially
after 1945 ?!,am I right ?.
 

Attachments

  • 70.png
    70.png
    111.1 KB · Views: 37
A few years ago I saw an American propaganda poster from the 40s/early 50s explaining the danger of the new Soviet fighter/rocket copied from the Me 163. Unfortunately, I've never found it again.
The drawing showed an Me-163 with the Red star on tail.
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom