Was the Belgian UFO a Rockwell nuclear powered flying wing design?

[Dilandu]

Yeah, but there were hundreds of observers .. including military and police men ..

All those "reports" came AFTER the incident became known to press - i.e. peoples started to think about it and let their imagination run wild.

 

[novum]

Yeah, and those also:

View attachment 754057

Oh yeah .. finally we found the solution! Where is the milk, and where is the sugar?

 

[Arjen]

An utter waste of electrons.

 

[DWG]

In "Innovative Strategic Aircraft Design Study (ISADS)", June 1978, (https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADC016293) the following nuclear powered aircraft design is being discussed:

View attachment 754026

View attachment 754027

View attachment 754028

Strangely, the same signature was found with the flying triangle that was seen by many witnesses in the belgian ufo case. The red light in the middle of the "UFO" was exacly where the laser in a ball concept was situated in the Rockwell design. A coincidence?

View attachment 754029

Hints are welcome.

Why on earth would a laser show as a red light?
Why would that laser be active?
Why would that laser be operating in the visual light frequency?
Why are you assuming the aircraft is nuclear powered? I've seen aircraft with exactly that planform, powered by a couple of bog-standard hobbyist glowplug engines.

Why haven't you asked yourself these questions. Pretty much everyone here is a sceptic, we want to see evidence that hangs together and is anchored on press releases, physical artifacts or clear imagery.

If it isn't clear, why isn't it?

I'd suggest looking at the New Jersey drone thread for a current example of the questions you should be asking yourself.

 

[Justo Miranda]

I think we are being too negative; I propose a higher line of thought because it is something that comes from the sky.

 

[Arjen]

I think my Yuletide Cheer is running really really low, so, see you tomorrow.

 

[overscan (PaulMM)]

Have you read the forum rules?

Banned. Topic locked.