Various Vought VTOL/VSTOL/STOL projects

Stargazer2006 said:
Interesting comparison, but there are notable differences. The trailing edge behind the engine exhausts is diamond-shaped on the RCS model, not on the LOAF-11. Also the fins are much closer at the tips, and the wings are not pointed.
The bottom pic is supposed to be XST but I have never seen any other angles of this pole model.
 
Better quality version of my image:
 

Attachments

  • XST in anechoic chamber.jpg
    XST in anechoic chamber.jpg
    340.6 KB · Views: 215
hesham said:
Great find Thiel and Sublight.
The book I got it from is an absolute goldmine. Aside from the XC-142A, which it covers in extreme detail all the way down to cockpit layout, it also has drawings and pictures of a number of VSTOL and SSTOL aircraft that I've never run across anywhere else.
 
sublight is back said:
You can thank Stargazer, he sniffed them out.

Actually what I did "sniff out" was the set of Rutan designs for SOFTA. And sublight dug them out. So it really was team work. Wish this could happen more often! I'm telling you, if I was over in the U.S., there is a wealth of archives I would gladly go dig into...
 
sublight is back said:
From the 1981 LOAVES study linked above...

Either I'm crazy, or they built an RCS model from the LOAVES study.....

The well circulated Senior Citizen design with the delta wing and the two strips of vertical lift engines, could be a misinterpretation of LOAVES-11. The numbering of the squares kind of struck me as odd though, almost like they were small vertical cells to hold something, say a standing or seated human. Which would dovetail into SOFTA and the SpecOps team insertion mission (minus land vehicle requirement for Senior Citizen), and wouldn't be all that different in terms of human stuffing layout from the SOFTA design that used the plenum (the first one)
 
A fascinating and as-yet unseen here (I think) VTOL project from Vought, found in TsAGI's Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya No.17-18, 1980:
 

Attachments

  • Vought VTOL.gif
    Vought VTOL.gif
    48.5 KB · Views: 1,028
And from the same publication, same issue, a jet VTOL using the same basic configuration:
 

Attachments

  • Vought VTOL jet.gif
    Vought VTOL jet.gif
    51.3 KB · Views: 993
Judging the shape of the engine nacelles, the jet version would have been a four-poster.
The turboprop version would have had tiltable nacelles and lift engines under those
doors in the tail and behind the cockpit ?
 
I found a chronology of Vought V/STOL Concepts from April 1978 that might be of interest to this discussion.

  • ADAM 1958-1970
  • XC-142 1961-1970
  • V/STOL Study {V-459/460/465/470} 1963-1964
  • NASA Study 1966
  • CARA (Air Force) 1966-1967
  • LIT (Air Force) 1967-1968
  • Jet Flap Rotor 1967-1969
  • Lift Jet Navy Fighter {V-517/521} 1971-1972
  • Lightweight VTOL Fighter Study 1971-1972
  • V/STOL Tactical Fighter (Air Force) 1971
  • Cross Flow Fan VTOL's 1972-1976
  • Navy Type A V/STOL (V-530) 1975-Present (1978)
  • Stopped Rotor 1976
  • Navy Type B V/STOL 1976-Present (1978)
 

Attachments

  • V-3.png
    V-3.png
    35.4 KB · Views: 181
  • V-2.png
    V-2.png
    29.6 KB · Views: 166
  • V-1.png
    V-1.png
    34.6 KB · Views: 637
Re: Vought low observables air vehicle engineering study 1981

sublight is back said:
LOAVES....

From same PDF.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    30.8 KB · Views: 226

Attachments

  • 31.png
    31.png
    230.7 KB · Views: 127
  • 36.png
    36.png
    62.3 KB · Views: 116
  • 37.png
    37.png
    73.2 KB · Views: 156
Last edited:
From Naval Air System Command 1975.
 

Attachments

  • 1.png
    1.png
    49.5 KB · Views: 106
  • 2.png
    2.png
    51.7 KB · Views: 103
  • 3.png
    3.png
    50.3 KB · Views: 97
  • 4.png
    4.png
    49.5 KB · Views: 100
  • 5.png
    5.png
    57.7 KB · Views: 108
  • 6.png
    6.png
    45.8 KB · Views: 115
  • 7.png
    7.png
    54.1 KB · Views: 114
Hesham, pics are from

"V/STOL CONCEPT SENSITIVITY STUDY"
D. F. Sattler (LTV AEROSPACE CORPORATION)

in

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP
PREDICTION METHODS for JET V/STOL PROPULSION AERODYNAMICS VOLUME I

Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Institute for Defense Analyses Arlington , VA on July 28-31 , 1975
Editor and Chairman : M. F. Platzer
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, CA

Moved to more suitable topic.
 
Last edited:
The twin canard looks interesting, especially with thrust more proportionate to center of gravity. Glad they kept to Harrier, though, because they all look progressively too complex.
 
Hesham, pics are from

"V/STOL CONCEPT SENSITIVITY STUDY"
D. F. Sattler (LTV AEROSPACE CORPORATION)

in

NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY GROUP
PREDICTION METHODS for JET V/STOL PROPULSION AERODYNAMICS VOLUME I

Proceedings of a Workshop held at the Institute for Defense Analyses Arlington , VA on July 28-31 , 1975
Editor and Chairman : M. F. Platzer
Naval Postgraduate School
Monterey, CA

Moved to more suitable topic.

By the way,that's a part One,if we can get the part Two,I think it has more Projects ?.
 

Attachments

  • 2.png
    2.png
    130.6 KB · Views: 45
  • 3.png
    3.png
    130.4 KB · Views: 36
  • 4.png
    4.png
    96.2 KB · Views: 43
A few more of what I have on the VTOL side of Vought - should have paid attention and place the HSV designs elsewhere.

Enjoy the Day!
Is there any more information for Case #6 in the first image? Or a 3 view of the aircraft in the second?
 

Similar threads

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom