XP67_Moonbat
ACCESS: Top Secret
- Joined
- 16 January 2008
- Messages
- 2,259
- Reaction score
- 461
XP67_Moonbat said:But that's one little mystery solved for me and one more to go.
Michel Van said:XP67_Moonbat said:But that's one little mystery solved for me and one more to go.
can this be a Dynamic Test of SSRB ?
roll them from VAB to Launch pad 39 and there test fire them ? ? ?
Even though the next shuttle launch remains months away, hardware continues to be moved around at the Kennedy Space Center as workers take time to perform tests on the equipment they use, even as they maintain their proficiency.
With that in mind, on Monday workers drove a crawler transporter under a Mobile Launch Platform (MLP) and carried it out a short ways towards the launch pads and then returned back to the Vehicle Assembly Building. Atop the MLP: a pair of 149-foot-tall solid rocket boosters, sans external tank and orbiter.
With the boosters braced at the top to minimize their swaying as the crawler transporter hit a blazing top speed of 1 mph, sensors strung throughout the MLP were taking vibration measurements. Analysis of the results should help with future maintenance plans and a better understanding of the loads placed on the shuttle while it is being moved.
XP67_Moonbat said:Thank you, Scott! Where would we be without you!
XP67_Moonbat said:Now what I have to show you guys is more or less "Shuttle-derived". Not in the sense of NASA's Ares boosters or DIRECT's Jupiter concepts. But since it uses a 2.5 SRB segment as it's first stage, I'd say this falls under the "Shuttle-derived" banner.
Here's the link:
http://www.planetspace.org/lo/osf.htm
Brickmuppet said:Hesham,
I'm pretty sure those engines were a detachable "kit" intended to fly the orbiter between landing, launching and servicing locations (as opposed to the 747 they actually used). If so, they would not have been used on an orbital flight and landing from orbit would still have been dead stick.
Orionblamblam said:Correct. It would arguably have been a superior way to ferry the Shuttle back and forth... all you'd need to get the Shuttle back from, say, the Easter Island landing facility would be a cargo aircraft that could deliver the jet pods and fuel. But if the Shuttle did have to put down somewhere unusual, NASA would have a hell of a time picking it up and putting it on the 747.
Orionblamblam said:But if the Shuttle did have to put down somewhere unusual, NASA would have a hell of a time picking it up and putting it on the 747.
GTX said:A good book on the Space Shuttle, especially the early development and alternative designs is "Space Shuttle: The History of Developing the National Space Transportation System" by Dennis R. Jenkins. Highly recommended.
Regards,
Greg
archipeppe said:GTX said:A good book on the Space Shuttle, especially the early development and alternative designs is "Space Shuttle: The History of Developing the National Space Transportation System" by Dennis R. Jenkins. Highly recommended.
Regards,
Greg
More than a good book this is THE book.
Triton said:Does anyone know anything about this Space Shuttle "Block II" concept?
Triton said:Does anyone know if there were any real plans to deliver nuclear weapons from the Space Shuttle cargo bay?
Orionblamblam said:Triton said:Does anyone know if there were any real plans to deliver nuclear weapons from the Space Shuttle cargo bay?
Not really, no. Undoubtedly the USAF noodled the idea around, but orbiting nukes have never been particularly popular.
When we analyzed the trajectories from Vandenberg we saw that it was possible for any military payload to re-enter from orbit in three and a half minutes to the main centers of the USSR, a much shorter time than (a submarine-launched ballastic missile) could make possible (ten minutes from off the coast.)
The military very sensitive to the variety of possible means of delivering the first strike, suspecting that a first-strike capability might be the Vandenberg Shuttle's objective...
The studies showed that the Space Shuttle could carry out a return maneuver from a half or a single orbit... approach Moscow and Leningrad from the south, and then performing a "dive" drop in this region a nuclear charge, and in combination with other means paralyze the military capability of the Soviet Union.
Triton said:According to Efraim Akin at the Institute of Applied Mathematics (IPM) of the Soviet Academy of Sciences:
hesham said:Thank you my dear Archipeppa,
and here is a Fully-reusable shuttle concept. North American Rockwell c. 1970.
http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/S/Space_Shuttle.html