They're one of the few real aircraft around. I used to tell the F-16 blow-pipe jockeys that if they really wanted to fly that they should go up to 10,000 and stopCaravellarella said:Stargazer2006 said:Although it's a retractoplane concept, I don't think it is the CARR (CL-945) because it looks different, it's smaller, and the folded-back blades don't seem to be housed within the fuselage here.
It's a helicopter Stéphane; I don't like them and I don't know much about them
If it's not a CARR, then is it a pre-CARR?
Terry (Caravellarella)
hesham said:Hi,
Does anyone have a drawing to Lockheed CL-879 a 80-passenger
compound helicopter project ?.
yasotay said:Again I wonder if modern aero engineering technology as developed by EADS (X3) would scale up satisfactorialy to make these ideas viable now without the need for an anti-torque component at the back of the aircraft. By this I mean use the wing mounted propulsion for anti-torque.
XB-70 said:Great find Skyblazer. I always liked this Lockheed high speed transports. Do you have an exact timeframe the CL-879 was studied?
Arjen said:Images merged with GIMP
From Ailes 1/3/1963.
From Ailes 1/3/1963.
Nice find hesham, it looks a lot like a cross between the C-130 cockpit and the Chinook, is there any more info on it?
I want to add a Lockheed proposal for a crane helicopter. My standard question: Which model number? Further information? The only thing I know is the payload of 20 t mentioned in the caption of the artwork.
SOURCE: "Der Flieger" magazine 12/1965 (page 293)