- Joined
- 25 June 2009
- Messages
- 14,107
- Reaction score
- 4,239
The recent discussion on another SD-112 competition made me realize that there is more to this SD- system than we thought.
SD-112 must have been a basic U.S. Navy specification for a twin-engined carrier-borne fighter, possibly issued in the mid- or late 1920s.
SD-112-14 (1938) produced designs from Brewster, Lockheed, Seversky and others, and led to the Grumman G-34 being procured as the XF5F-1.
Unfortunately, this aircraft proved unsatisfactory.
As hesham pointed out earlier today, the Grumman F7F won the SD-112-18 competition circa 1942, as clearly written on the Bell Model 22 plan.
And so there is a strong possibility here that the suffixes -14 and -18 may have indicated the number of times that the basic specification was modified. Thus the fact that SD-112-14 and -18 were not in sequential order with other SD- specifications of the same time (e.g. SD-220 for the Dauntless).
Any clues or valuable comments/additions to this hypothesis?
SD-112 must have been a basic U.S. Navy specification for a twin-engined carrier-borne fighter, possibly issued in the mid- or late 1920s.
SD-112-14 (1938) produced designs from Brewster, Lockheed, Seversky and others, and led to the Grumman G-34 being procured as the XF5F-1.
Unfortunately, this aircraft proved unsatisfactory.
As hesham pointed out earlier today, the Grumman F7F won the SD-112-18 competition circa 1942, as clearly written on the Bell Model 22 plan.
And so there is a strong possibility here that the suffixes -14 and -18 may have indicated the number of times that the basic specification was modified. Thus the fact that SD-112-14 and -18 were not in sequential order with other SD- specifications of the same time (e.g. SD-220 for the Dauntless).
Any clues or valuable comments/additions to this hypothesis?