Solicitation Number:
14-039-XR-Terminal_Phase_Experiment Notice Type:
Sources Sought Synopsis:
Added: Feb 12, 2014 6:40 pm
I. Description / Purpose:
I.1. The Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC), Development Planning (XR) Directorate, Los Angeles Air Force Base, California is exploring the feasibility of pursuing advancements in hypersonic technologies through a series of sounding rocket flights. The goal of the flights is to develop, mature, and test next-generation technologies needed for maneuverable, hypersonic flight for a variety of missions. The sounding rocket flights seek technological advances particularly in the areas of next-generation vehicle shapes, precision guidance, navigation, and control (GN&C), maneuverability, and enhanced range and data collection methods. The ultimate goal of the flight program is to address technical challenges and improve understanding of terminal phase performance of hypersonic flight vehicles. The government believes a low-risk, incremental approach using multiple sounding rocket flights can offer a cost effective method for executing this type of technology development.
SMC currently envisions a series flights of the same flight vehicle using differing trajectories and ranges to evaluate various objectives. Together, the series of flights are referred to as the Terminal Phase Flight Experiment (TPFE). Since SMC's primary focus is on vehicle performance after separation from the booster, it is envisioned that industry's participation is primarily dedicated to design, development, manufacturing, and instrumenting of the flight vehicle and GN&C system. To assist in bounding the TPFE and enable collection of data of interest, the government has established a set of broad parameters that respondents will need to demonstrate an ability to meet with their proposed concept and approach
[...].
ISP said:Meanwhile on fbo, the Air Force wants to play with sounding rockets :
Solicitation Number:
14-039-XR-Terminal_Phase_Experiment Notice Type:
Sources Sought Synopsis:
Added: Feb 12, 2014 6:40 pm
I. Description / Purpose:
I.1. The Space and Missile Systems Center (SMC), Development Planning (XR) Directorate, Los Angeles Air Force Base, California is exploring the feasibility of pursuing advancements in hypersonic technologies through a series of sounding rocket flights. The goal of the flights is to develop, mature, and test next-generation technologies needed for maneuverable, hypersonic flight for a variety of missions. The sounding rocket flights seek technological advances particularly in the areas of next-generation vehicle shapes, precision guidance, navigation, and control (GN&C), maneuverability, and enhanced range and data collection methods. The ultimate goal of the flight program is to address technical challenges and improve understanding of terminal phase performance of hypersonic flight vehicles. The government believes a low-risk, incremental approach using multiple sounding rocket flights can offer a cost effective method for executing this type of technology development.
SMC currently envisions a series flights of the same flight vehicle using differing trajectories and ranges to evaluate various objectives. Together, the series of flights are referred to as the Terminal Phase Flight Experiment (TPFE). Since SMC's primary focus is on vehicle performance after separation from the booster, it is envisioned that industry's participation is primarily dedicated to design, development, manufacturing, and instrumenting of the flight vehicle and GN&C system. To assist in bounding the TPFE and enable collection of data of interest, the government has established a set of broad parameters that respondents will need to demonstrate an ability to meet with their proposed concept and approach
[...].
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=a9d162eacc37b78956c85c9762ebb5f1&tab=core&tabmode=list&=
DSE said:DARPA-SN-14-25 Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) Proposers Day
Solicitation Number: DARPA-SN-14-25
Notice Type: Special Notice
Synopsis: Added: Mar 11, 2014 8:43 am
Type: Other (Draft RFPs/RFIs, Responses to Questions, etc..)
Posted Date: March 11, 2014
DARPA-SN-14-25_TBG_Proposers'_Day.pdf (158.95 Kb)
Description: DARPA‐SN‐14‐25 Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) Proposers Day
Contracting Office Address: 675 North Randolph Street
Arlington, Virginia 22203-2114
United States
Place of Performance: 675 North Randolph Street
Arlington, Virginia 22203
United States
Primary Point of Contact.: DARPA-SN-14-25@darpa.mil DARPA-SN-14-25@darpa.mil
bobbymike said:Does this read like a Skybolt type vehicle maybe with an HTV-2 attached or am I missing something?
quellish said:bobbymike said:Does this read like a Skybolt type vehicle maybe with an HTV-2 attached or am I missing something?
It's more like X-51 without the engine, or like one of the related programs from the 80s.
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_07_08_2013_p24-593534.xml
I wonder how they are going to justify this given the existing SPAWAR program.
sferrin said:quellish said:bobbymike said:Does this read like a Skybolt type vehicle maybe with an HTV-2 attached or am I missing something?
It's more like X-51 without the engine, or like one of the related programs from the 80s.
http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/AW_07_08_2013_p24-593534.xml
I wonder how they are going to justify this given the existing SPAWAR program.
Apples and oranges.
bobbymike said:
The news outlet described the WU-14 as the Chinese military's response to hypersonic technologies under development in the United States, including the X-51A WaveRider and the SR-72 aircraft.
bobbymike said:DSE - now our hypothetical weapon systems start arms races
http://breakingdefense.com/2014/03/hypersonic-weapons-face-major-milestone-in-august-test/?utm_source=Breaking+Defense&utm_campaign=d86f1e332f-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4368933672-d86f1e332f-407814345
Just being facetious at the mention of the SR-72DSE said:bobbymike said:DSE - now our hypothetical weapon systems start arms races
http://breakingdefense.com/2014/03/hypersonic-weapons-face-major-milestone-in-august-test/?utm_source=Breaking+Defense&utm_campaign=d86f1e332f-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_4368933672-d86f1e332f-407814345
Not sure what you mean by hypothetical or an arms race. Continuation of the AHW was always in the cards, as was HAWCK. Just needed a real budget for new programs to start. They didn't just pop up in reaction to the Chinese boost glide experiment.
DSE said:Not sure what you mean by hypothetical or an arms race. Continuation of the AHW was always in the cards, as was HAWCK. Just needed a real budget for new programs to start. They didn't just pop up in reaction to the Chinese boost glide experiment.
sferrin said:HAWCK? ???
“The increase in our budget from 2014 to 2015 says a lot about what the Secretary of Defense and White House think about technology, and their desire to invest in the future,” says Steven Walker, Darpa’s deputy director. “Our budget is about 2% of the R&D that is federally funded, but it is unconstrained by formal requirements, people or infrastructure,” he told Aviation Week’s Defense Technology and Requirements conference in Washington March 4.
Introduced with the 2015 budget request are two hypersonics projects to be jointly conducted with the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL)—the Hypersonic Air-Breathing Weapon Concept (HAWC) and Tactical Boost Glide (TBG) programs.
Intended to demonstrate technology for an affordable hypersonic cruise missile, HAWC is a follow-on to the successful AFRL/Darpa-funded Boeing X-51A scramjet engine demonstrator.
TBG follows on from Darpa’s unsuccessful Lockheed Martin HTV-2 unpowered hypersonic cruise vehicle, but is scaled down to a tactical-range weapon that can be air- or ship-launched.
DSE said:HAWC aka HSSW
sferrin said:DSE said:HAWC aka HSSW
What's the difference between the two? As I recall, HSSW was cancelled approximately 3:22 after it was announced. ???
sferrin said:*facepalm*
that means the U.S. wants an unbeatable missile that can smash Iranian and Chinese defenses.
bobbymike said:Yes 'global strike promise' but we need a a submarine based, intermediate range and land based boost glide system now we can't wait for air breathing hypersonics to mature enough to be turned into a weapon system, IMHO.
bobbymike said:
DSE said:bobbymike said:
Test of the NASA/USAF/PW GDE-2 conducted in 2006 for the X-43C program in the NASA LaRC 8-FT High Temperature Tunnel. IIRC, GDE (Ground Demonstraion Engine-2 was a combination of the PW fuel-cooled GDE-1 tested under HyTech for the USAF with a variable geometry inlet. X-43C was envisioned to have three engine modules side-by-side, but after program cuts the test only had one. Hence the extra-wide forebody compared to the inlet.
bobbymike said:Thanks much appreciated - SP greatest community of aerospace experts/enthusiasts on the Interwebs!!
bobbymike said:
bobbymike said:
sublight is back said:Does anybody believe there will be a conflict with them that does not involve nuclear weapons? Even if we're not going to nuke them, it makes more sense to use sub launched missiles for a quick strike if latency is an issue.
sferrin said:sublight is back said:Does anybody believe there will be a conflict with them that does not involve nuclear weapons? Even if we're not going to nuke them, it makes more sense to use sub launched missiles for a quick strike if latency is an issue.
I can see it. Say Russia or China nukes Hawaii as an example and then tells us to stand down or else they'll nuke a bunch of cities in the Continental US? Do you honestly believe the current administration would nuke them right back? You better HOPE they believe we would or else times are gonna get interesting indeed.
sublight is back said:sferrin said:sublight is back said:Does anybody believe there will be a conflict with them that does not involve nuclear weapons? Even if we're not going to nuke them, it makes more sense to use sub launched missiles for a quick strike if latency is an issue.
I can see it. Say Russia or China nukes Hawaii as an example and then tells us to stand down or else they'll nuke a bunch of cities in the Continental US? Do you honestly believe the current administration would nuke them right back? You better HOPE they believe we would or else times are gonna get interesting indeed.
Regardless of the current administrations political leanings, I think in a full holy shit situation, they would step back and give the joint chiefs complete control of the chess field at that point. I think Putin knows what he can get away with and has gamed the conflict accordingly.
But again, I am still back to, what scenario would these be useful against the Russians? If we use them, they are not going to hold back. They are gonna go nuclear.
sferrin said:If we bloodied their nose in Crimea they aren't going to go WWIII on us. They ARE going to push until we force them to stop however. And rhetoric ain't gonna cut it. If you aren't willing to do that, or are afraid to, you may as well hand them the keys to the castle. This is what showing weakness gets you.
sublight is back said:sferrin said:If we bloodied their nose in Crimea they aren't going to go WWIII on us. They ARE going to push until we force them to stop however. And rhetoric ain't gonna cut it. If you aren't willing to do that, or are afraid to, you may as well hand them the keys to the castle. This is what showing weakness gets you.
Yes, and I agreed with you when I said "I think Putin knows what he can get away with and has gamed the conflict accordingly."
Are you saying PGS at Crimean targets is a viable usage scenario? It seems low signature strike weapons would maximize the surprise factor, where PGS would provide more warning.