As I mentioned, some 'paper architecture' is intended purely for provoking thought. In the 18th century, Etienne-Louis Boullée wrote a long essay on architectural composition illustrated by himself with depictions of gargantuan edifices that would have been economically impossible but which he used for teaching the principles of architecture and which proved immensely influential on 20th century modernism.

Below, his Cenotaph for Isaac Newton. Inspired by the tomb of Augustus and inspiring one of the Frank Lloyd Wright schemes I've shown above, and probably Tatlin's tower with its cosmic associations (and Albert Speer's Grosse Halle...).
 

Attachments

  • N7701015_JPEG_2_2DM.jpg
    N7701015_JPEG_2_2DM.jpg
    236.1 KB · Views: 20
  • N7701015_JPEG_4_4DM.jpg
    N7701015_JPEG_4_4DM.jpg
    180.2 KB · Views: 13
  • N7701015_JPEG_5_5DM.jpg
    N7701015_JPEG_5_5DM.jpg
    214.8 KB · Views: 11
  • N7701015_JPEG_6_6DM.jpg
    N7701015_JPEG_6_6DM.jpg
    219.1 KB · Views: 10
  • n780.jpg
    n780.jpg
    137 KB · Views: 12
Lebbeus Woods was a pure paper architect. In this video, Dami Lee offers a good explanation of the role of paper architecture and its presence in popular culture with a discussion of the manga BLAME! and Woods' work.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ynSG5GLoQ0


Her channel is here, and the videos are enjoyable and accessible:


Interestingly, the older ones are about making a living as a young architect and the more recent ones look at fictional and theoretical architecture.
 
Don't forget Minnesota Experimental City.

1725846033489.png
1725846051404.png 1725846071528.png 1725846092484.png

More to be found here
 
I have a vague memory about seeing concepts on buildings capable of surviving bombing air raids. I guess it was an old science magazine but I can't locate anything about that on internet. It was something similar to a "flakturm" but in a much bigger scale. Any clue?
 
I have a vague memory about seeing concepts on buildings capable of surviving bombing air raids. I guess it was an old science magazine but I can't locate anything about that on internet. It was something similar to a "flakturm" but in a much bigger scale. Any clue?
 
Archigram was one wildest visionary group in Architecture of 1960s
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2jE_otnIpY&t=484s


They went full commercialise housing construction in style of car industry !
One of there concept was Plug-in City
a conceptual city comprising personalised pre-fabricated homes that are inserted into high-rise megastructures.

View: https://youtu.be/v3HPCarhOyg


They went even step further proposing to put those pre-fabricated homes into The Walking City

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYHG_t7SF8E
 
I have a vague memory about seeing concepts on buildings capable of surviving bombing air raids. I guess it was an old science magazine but I can't locate anything about that on internet. It was something similar to a "flakturm" but in a much bigger scale. Any clue?
I seem to remember seeing this too, but can't remember where.
 
More London never-builts:



The Guardian also had an Unbuilt Cities series a few years back with more global coverage:
 
A 1970s proposal for the site upon which Portcullis House was eventually built. This is the building from which Professor Bernard Quatermass gazes down upon HMS Arbalest in the 1979 novel 'Quatermass' by Nigel Kneale.

 
Last edited:
A speculative proposal from 1904 for a massive Victorian Gothic tower and halls to be erected next to Westminster Abby to make the space more appropriate for future Imperial coronations. Apparently the proposal generated quite a lot of opposition at the time it was proposed, and never got off the ground.

 
One of my favourite unbuilt buildings, the Great Model Plan for St Paul's, London, by Christopher Wren, 1673. I once had the pleasure of being shown this specially when on a tour and I asked to see it. It wasn't part of the tour but the guides kindly took me to the room. The lights came on slowly (part of the preservation protocol is to keep light low and not subject it to sudden changes of light, temperature, or humidity), adding to the drama as it appeared first as a dim shape in the gloom and then in full illumination.

The Anglican church rejected this design as being 'Popish' (as someone would say 'woke' today), but more reasonably, it would take decades to finish and could not be used until it was. The design that was actually built, could serve as a church with only the nave completed. Wren did get the last laugh - the design that was finally approved appeared to be begin building, but the foundations seemed rather more massive and then when the walls finally rose, it could be seen that he had persisted with further development, still referring to elements of the Great Model.

Wren lived to be 90 and actually saw the cathedral essentially completed.

There's another story about Wren too: a client for another project insisted that extra columns be used to support a beam and he reluctantly complied. More than three hundred years later when renovations were underway, contractors discovered that the columns were half an inch too short and were not in fact touching, let alone supporting the beam.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YKGkZtN_kB8&t=5s
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2185-1024x768.jpg
    IMG_2185-1024x768.jpg
    62.4 KB · Views: 9
  • Wren282.jpg
    Wren282.jpg
    757.2 KB · Views: 6
  • Wren279.jpg
    Wren279.jpg
    713.4 KB · Views: 5
  • unnamed.jpg
    unnamed.jpg
    322.5 KB · Views: 5
  • TriforumGreatModel03.jpg
    TriforumGreatModel03.jpg
    17.2 KB · Views: 5
  • wren-great-model-of-st-pauls.jpg
    wren-great-model-of-st-pauls.jpg
    915.4 KB · Views: 8
  • P-6-081040a.jpg
    P-6-081040a.jpg
    354.2 KB · Views: 24
  • eudmjqcuv1e4rhzbwarg.jpg
    eudmjqcuv1e4rhzbwarg.jpg
    262.3 KB · Views: 9
Last edited:
Wren's plan for rebuilding London after the Great Fire of 1666. Obviously not followed in the reconstruction - the problem was that while the city may have been just smouldering ashes and rubble, people still owned title to land there, so the reconstruction had to approximately follow the old mediaeval plan after all.
 

Attachments

  • SH803.jpg
    SH803.jpg
    456.6 KB · Views: 13
Another great unbuilt church with a big model. The Liverpool Metropolitan Cathedral by Edwin Lutyens, 1933. The crypt was completed but WWII put a stop to construction and then it was considered too expensive. A different architect completed it in Brutalist style and at a smaller scale.
 

Attachments

  • lutyenssept1943lz5.jpg
    lutyenssept1943lz5.jpg
    364.9 KB · Views: 13
  • livpmod7.jpg
    livpmod7.jpg
    40.8 KB · Views: 11
  • livpmod11.jpg
    livpmod11.jpg
    35.4 KB · Views: 10
  • livpmod2.jpg
    livpmod2.jpg
    34.9 KB · Views: 10
  • Lutyens model 2.jpg
    Lutyens model 2.jpg
    1.2 MB · Views: 11
Last edited:
What finally happened, by Frank Gibberd. You can see the Lutyens-designed crypt in one of the photos and the aerial view shows the footprint of the original design.
 

Attachments

  • HPIM0915.jpg
    HPIM0915.jpg
    64.5 KB · Views: 9
  • Liverpool_Metropolitan_Cathedral_at_dusk_(reduced_grain),_corrected_perspective-1.jpg
    Liverpool_Metropolitan_Cathedral_at_dusk_(reduced_grain),_corrected_perspective-1.jpg
    7.7 MB · Views: 12
  • liverpool_catholic_cathedral_wa271108.jpg
    liverpool_catholic_cathedral_wa271108.jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 29
The 1930s seems to have been a time when newspapers published all kinds of speculative ideas on what should be done with London, for example canalizing the Thames.


As mentioned in the linked article the proposal included the idea of building an airport that straddled the Thames, this seems to have been a popular idea as this second article shows.

 
There's another story about Wren too: a client for another project insisted that extra columns be used to support a beam and he reluctantly complied. More than three hundred years later when renovations were underway, contractors discovered that the columns were half an inch too short and were not in fact touching, let alone supporting the beam.
Those are insane levels of pettiness
 

Please donate to support the forum.

Back
Top Bottom