- Joined
- 9 October 2009
- Messages
- 21,149
- Reaction score
- 12,285
Some reports I've seen suggest at least four 'white tails'.
The first installation batch of NK-32 engines of the second stage was delivered for the modernized Tu-160M
The United Engine Corporation (UEC, part of the Rostec State Corporation) has begun mass production of the NK-32-02 engines.
Currently, UEC conducts qualification and service life tests of NK-32 series 02 engines at stands. "The newly manufactured engines meet the requirements of the design and regulatory documentation stated in the tactical and technical assignment," the corporation stressed. The UEC is completing the modernization of production at the UEC-Kuznetsov enterprise, which was required to start the serial production of the second stage NK-32 engines for the modernized Tu-160M strategic missile carriers. "Implementation of measures to organize serial production of NK-32 series 02 engines has been completed. The need to ensure an increase in production throughput entailed a large-scale reconstruction of production," the UEC said.
So it appears that the reintroduction of newly manufactured NK-32 engines has been established, with the model called 02.
No idea what this model entails.
Reading on this matter over the last year or so, reports are that they have re-established the specialised manufacturing capacity to fabricate the massive titanium central fuselage/wing structure that is the core of the airframe.
If this is the case, they would only do this if new airframes are to be manufactured, and not simply finishing off existing unfinished airframes, in my opinion.
So, reading the above posts, it appears that the existing airframes (2 to 4 remaining?) that were unfinished will be completed to Tu-160M specifications, which will incorporate M2 features, and whilst this is going on, preparation for newly manufactured M2 models will be ongoing?
If so, this is a very sensible approach.
Official statement:Does the NK-32-02 have redesigned blades?
Now you did it.How does the Tu160 compare with the B1B that is leaving US service?
So it makes it fifth. Well, sixth if we include 22M3M.Judging by the photos, it is equipped with mockups of "Vitebsk" self-defence system
So it makes it fifth. Well, sixth if we include 22M3M.
Nah, specifically laser-based ones, as was discussed on paralay.IL-112V, IL-76/78MD-90A, Tu-22M3M, Tu-160M - planes with "Vitebsk"
Ka-52, Mi-28NM, Mi-26T2, Mi-35M - helis with "Vitebsk"
There is no IL-96 in VKS if I haven't missed anything in recent years.Military Il-96
Same here - never heard about Tu-214 in VKS.Tu-214s also have it
I'm more surprised that the EO targeting system (normally located forward of the blade antenna) seems to be gone
didn't the Tu-22M3M get a new one
I only consider a complete SPS, which should include an active laser system.Nah, specifically laser-based ones, as was discussed on paralay.
There is no IL-96 in VKS if I haven't missed anything in recent years.
Same here - never heard about Tu-214 in VKS.
Yeah, Tu-160M is no longer a bomber, but only a guided-missile carrier.
Well, then only ones I mentioned in first post match. Rest use non-coherent L370-5.I only consider a complete SPS, which should include an active laser system.Nah, specifically laser-based ones, as was discussed on paralay.
This is a general question. Is Mach 2 machine with less invisibility or subsonic machine with high invisibility more suitable?Let me know when Russia flies a B2 lookalike prototype rather than an indifferent copy of a nearly 50 year old US design
Let me know...!
do you know...?
No idea...!
Am I mid-remembering or was that a function back in the day of giving some kind of protection to them from the nuclear flash.I don't think its any coincidence that the sexiest looking and most talked about post-war aircraft were all painted white (Arrow, TSR2, B-70, B-1A, Concorde, Tu-160, Vulcan etc.).