The Epstein files have not yet been released though. I’m sure it’s an honest mistake that will soon be rectified.
Now if he'll just tell us what the drones are.......
This is simply a political stunt to distract from a whole host of very damaging EOs. I strongly doubt there is anything interesting or even currently relevant in those files.
In my country we call that throwing the ball out of the field of play to buy time: it has been no one in this world, they all killed him, but he only died, etc.
I sincerely doubt we will ever see any files with real revelations, since they are likely "securely" stashed in boxes next to Trump's toilet in Mar-a-Lago, and we all know Trump uses toilet bowls like other people use paper shredders.
There’s been claims that a lot of these could be repeats of already released documents.It seems next release could include up to 2400 newly discovered documents:
Respectfully, the data forthcoming from the FBI for the Butler PA attempt is zero to nil regarding Crooks social media, bank accounts, affiliations, gun range companions, phone GPS tracking, etc. - as well as prior surveillance, active FBI involvement in security planning for the Trump rally. Much less the second attempt.Yeeeeah... as if Oliver Stoned (the aptly named) knew better in fiction and 30 years after the facts, than the Warren Commission itself...
Why on earth is it so hard to admit that Oswald was a loner and a loony yet a loony that had USMC training and thus knew how to use a sniper riffle ?
That JFK security at Dealey Plaza that day was a sick joke ?
That over the next twenty years half a dozen high profile murders (or atempts) happened, same loony loners profiles, and yet no such conspiracy B.S ? RFK, MLK, Wallace, Jerry Ford twice in two weeks, and Reagan ? and all the Sirhan, Earl Rey, Bremer, Fromme, Hinckley were all similar to Oswald - lost souls, loony loners ?
Disgruntled men and women with almost free access to lethal weaponry - that was not going to end well...
The average person is unaware that the Freedom of Information Act has exceptions that fall under "national security."
The National Archives said on Tuesday that “all records previously withheld for classification” had been released and were available to access either online or in person.
The archives uploaded about 63,000 pages of documents on its website in two initial tranches, with more files to be posted online as they are digitised.
"The first JFK files release of 2025 is an encouraging start," Jefferson Morley of the Mary Ferrell Foundation, a nonprofit that operates a database of government records on the Kennedy assassination, said on X. "We now have complete versions of approximately a third of the redacted JFK documents held by the National Archives (1,124 of approximately 3,500 documents ). Rampant overclassification of trivial information has been eliminated and there appear to be no redactions, though we have not viewed every document."
With a suggestion?The previously-classified portion of the memo cites the specific number of CIA personnel that had been stationed at the U.S. embassy in Paris, where "CIA has even sought to monopolize contact with certain French political personalities, among them the President of the National Assembly," the memo said.
Cheap...The newly-disclosed portions detail CIA surveillance of Soviet embassies in Mexico City and efforts to recruit double agents from Soviet agency personnel -- and reveal the names and positions of those who were recruited.
The newly-disclosed portions detail CIA surveillance of Soviet embassies in Mexico City and efforts to recruit double agents from Soviet agency personnel -- and reveal the names and positions of those who were recruited. The CIA officials writing these memos tout the efficacy of their efforts, with one trumpeting, "I cannot help but feel that we are buying a great deal for our money in this project."
Spying on other embassies--double agents...par for the course. It would surprise me more if they didn't do that kind of statecraft. The way you spot a KGB man in that era is that he NEVER drinks when dining with an asset--for example.And some flabbergasting non-redacted bits:
Spying on other embassies--double agents...par for the course. It would surprise me more if they didn't do that kind of statecraft. The way you spot a KGB man in that era is that he NEVER drinks when dining with an asset--for example.
Spying on other embassies--double agents...par for the course. It would surprise me more if they didn't do that kind of statecraft. The way you spot a KGB man in that era is that he NEVER drinks when dining with an asset--for example.
Even if the CIA was behind JFK's assassination--that would likely never have been documented--or those papers burned. (I'd like to think the CIA would have done a neater job).
My guess as to what was behind the delay would be that the CIA had lots of (Batista type) Whitey Bulgers of their own--same as FBI. Neither young spooks nor white-bread kids from Quantico knew jack about what goes on in the streets.
Only organized crime (and later, Contras) have that level of granularity in terms of local goings-on.
So, no--I don't believe the CIA had anything to do with JFK--I could have made that shot.
What I do think *was* done by Kissinger's made guys?
I think the CIA sanctioned priests:
"When I fed the poor, they called me a saint. When I asked why they were poor, they called me a communist."
Not that FARQ and other outfits had clean hands either. Everything is still a mess.
The moment this happened, that is, the moment the CIA realized they could no longer influence the President, a plan was put into motion to eliminate him. He had become useless in terms of meeting their goals. Satellite images and overflights confirmed that China was building its first atomic bomb. The CIA needed a forward base of operations in the region. They did not want to see a repeat of the Korean War which had ended 10 years earlier. It was vital to prevent the spread of Communism in the region.
I have no interest in being adversarial or argumentative, but I just want to point out that the idea of the CIA in the 50s and 60s assassinating their own President is insane. The Cold War was brand new. People were patriotic AF. Even in Dallas. The CIA was/is protecting counter-intelligence assets that were tracking Oswald and others. They were opening domestic mail. They were bugging offices. Ways and means; sources and methods are the tools of the trade.
With respect to your insinuations that I am either regarded or talking out of my butt, I have zero problem accepting everything you've written as fact, and maintaining my position. Please, agree to disagree?
"agree to disagree" is like unilateral disarmament, it doesn't work.
Without documentation, all you have is unsupported claims.The CIA was involved. An eyewitness published the facts.
Without documentation, all you have is unsupported claims.
You've read some books which made claims and arguments you found convincing. If this is "documentation", then so is the Bible, and we must regard the Creationist viewpoint proven.
You've read some books which made claims and arguments you found convincing. If this is "documentation", then so is the Bible, and we must regard the Creationist viewpoint proven.