Maybe it's just the apartment/car keys?The simulation has a less pronounced antenna jutting out the side at least.
Best picture of the stack yet.
turns out 2060 is little far out as Laser Coupled Particle Beams (LCPBs) are a thing in civilian research..
Future Trends and Challenges for PB Weapon Technologies
Despite investments spanning several decades, PB weapons are currently unproven and significant challenges to their adoption remain.
Neutron and photon beam sources in SWAP-constrained packages are insufficient to generate militarily relevant effects.
In order to be militarily relevant by 2060, particle beams must propagate militarily relevant distances.
There was also this:turns out 2060 is little far out as Laser Coupled Particle Beams (LCPBs) are a thing in civilian research..
This has nothing to do with Space ForceHow two SATCOM companies are responding to Starlink’s dominance
OneWeb and Intelsat are positioning themselves to compete with Elon Musk's SpaceX.www.c4isrnet.com
dont know dont care, likely not, but if there were to be be any escalation NATO would have NO CHOICE but to utilize as much Starlink as could be immediately procured.Does the U.S. use Starlink outside of its contract for Ukraine?
Off topic - I can be from time to time (as well as redundant) - but I just don’t understand why there are many many SRB designs that appear to be conversion candidates for the conventional IRBM mission and never seem to be contemplated for that purpose. History is filled with “ballistic missile to booster” examples why not go the other way?
I’m taking about solid rocket boosters like the Castor/GEM family of solid rockets not like a SpaceX Falcon 9.Readiness? Resilience to first strike? Long term storage...
Plenty of good reason.
I’m taking about solid rocket boosters like the Castor/GEM family of solid rockets not like a SpaceX Falcon 9.
SRM is the proper term, SRB refers to specific configurations (Shuttle and Atlas V). The unsuitability is due to too big (long), not made for the elements, not for long term storage, too high of thrust (vs longer duration), not robust for handling. And because they were banned by the INF for most of the last of the 35 years.Off topic - I can be from time to time (as well as redundant) - but I just don’t understand why there are many many SRB designs that appear to be conversion candidates for the conventional IRBM mission and never seem to be contemplated for that purpose. History is filled with “ballistic missile to booster” examples why not go the other way?