i always thought that KV-1s and KV-2s were a bit unrealistic and were just a tank project until i learned more. then i saw the proposal for the KV-4 and it was actually pretty cool. sloped armour lower profile and better weight distribution than the previous fridge-headed models. but just thinking about loading a KV-2 and slamming a HEAT round through a tiger II is a very tempting thought.
The KV-220s though....
wasnt there a KV-220 pillbox?
Thing about Pycrete, IIRC, was that it would work. Well, 'kinda, sorta'. Frozen 'paper mache' turned out to be remarkably resilient to gun-fire and, yes, thawing...
Thankfully, 'escort carriers' came along, so semi-kamikase 'HurriCats' were no longer required, and Pycrete's inventor faded from history...
i always thought that KV-1s and KV-2s were a bit unrealistic and were just a tank project until i learned more. then i saw the proposal for the KV-4 and it was actually pretty cool. sloped armour lower profile and better weight distribution than the previous fridge-headed models. but just thinking about loading a KV-2 and slamming a HEAT round through a tiger II is a very tempting thought.
Theoretically it is possible. The M-10 howitzer (used in the KV-2) could fire HEAT with a 250 mm AP, but by the time 152 mm HEAT appeared in the Soviet army, only a few KV-2s had survived. But, getting from KV-2 to Tiger would be very difficult.
By the way, the KV-2 was not the only tank with howitzers. The KV-1S (light version of the KV-1) in the project had options with an 85 mm cannon, 122 mm and 152 mm howitzers, in fact, it turned out to be possible to create a tank with a 152 mm howitzer in a turret the size of a KV-1 turret, however, it would be pretty cramped. It was also a 152mm howitzer with 508 mps. There were several projects of the T-39 heavy tank, which had a 152-mm NG howitzer (German development for the USSR, sFH 18 "sister") with 542 mps, in another version the T-39 should have been armed with a 152-mm cannon 1910/1930 with 660 mps ... In 1942, the project of the IS tank was discussed with a 152 mm ML-20 with 660 mps (imagine a giant T-34 with a turret similar to the SU-152). Even larger was the T-100V project with a 203 mm B-4 with 607 mps, as well as a VL with a 305 mm B-23 with 638 mps. This is probably the largest howitzer the Russians wanted to put in a tank turret. Apart from a few projects similar to the German Waffentrager, for example, the T-34 with a 400 mm howitzer ("mortar" according to Russian classification, the same base made it possible to install a 305 mm howitzer or a 210 mm cannon):
A pillbox with a KV-220 turret supposedly existed, but there are doubts about the reliability of the only photo:
In any case, the KV-220 really existed:
seems to me like they just wanted to build the biggest gun toting tank possible to scare the sheet out of the Germans. 155-200mm would be sufficient enough to battle them. you dont need to go through all the way to 300-400mm howitzers. and besides. can the hull even withstand the recoil of a 350-400mm howitzer shot without structural reinforcements?
Probably the two silliest PAVs I can find. One is the AirspaceX MOBi, here because of unnecessary origami, while the lava lamp in a sombrero is an AirVinci.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.