Operational test of Jetpacks has resurfaced fuelled by Startups with no real market and a full trail of blazing innovation.
I think it's time we have a thread to discuss gently and keep each other updated on the subject.
Here is an illustration of a discutable experiment:
View: https://twitter.com/i/status/1317172531573424135
Years ago, I had to touch this particular subject and it came to me that a jetpack with air turbine above water is probably the worst mean of propulsion you could choose to propel an individual in that situation. Using a denser medium for propulsion would in theory also offers protective non-lethal means of defense (passive or active) as a lower fuel consumption and much greater range.
What would you think?
I think it's time we have a thread to discuss gently and keep each other updated on the subject.
Here is an illustration of a discutable experiment:
#FunFactFriday - The Royal Navy has been testing Jet Suit assault teams to determine if the Iron Man-like suits could be used to rapidly swarm and board ships. U.S. Special Operations Command is also evaluating a jetpack that can reach speeds of more than 200 mph. pic.twitter.com/mo5FoGWkDu
— U.S. Naval Institute (@NavalInstitute) October 16, 2020
Years ago, I had to touch this particular subject and it came to me that a jetpack with air turbine above water is probably the worst mean of propulsion you could choose to propel an individual in that situation. Using a denser medium for propulsion would in theory also offers protective non-lethal means of defense (passive or active) as a lower fuel consumption and much greater range.
What would you think?
Last edited: